头孢唑林与安慰剂对低风险剖宫产手术抗生素预防:可行性盲法随机对照试验。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Victoria A Eley, Severine Navarro, Elizabeth Martin, Akwasi Amoako, Gunter Hartel, Christine Woods, Yan Lu, Jeffrey Lipman, Jason Roberts, Mimi Tang, Leonie Callaway
{"title":"头孢唑林与安慰剂对低风险剖宫产手术抗生素预防:可行性盲法随机对照试验。","authors":"Victoria A Eley, Severine Navarro, Elizabeth Martin, Akwasi Amoako, Gunter Hartel, Christine Woods, Yan Lu, Jeffrey Lipman, Jason Roberts, Mimi Tang, Leonie Callaway","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07484-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pre-incisional antibiotics are recommended for all patients having cesarean delivery, despite emerging concerns regarding effects on the infant. In this feasibility blinded randomized controlled trial we aimed to test research processes in low-risk women receiving cefazolin or placebo prior to elective cesarean delivery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The trial was prospectively registered (ACTRN12619001705178). Eligible women were aged ≥ 18 and < 40 years, ≥ 37 weeks gestation, at low risk of surgical site infection (SSI) and recruited from a single tertiary centre. We reported proportions of women eligible and consenting; adherence to perioperative infection prevention; blinding adequacy of staff using Bang's blinding index; SSI surveillance and diagnosis according to the Centre for Disease Control definitions and patient reported outcome measures using validated questionnaires up to 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We screened 1651 women, with 1245 (75%) ineligible based on body mass index or presence of diabetes. Of 287 eligible women, 30 were randomized (11%) with 15 in each group. Reasons for non-participation included \"wanting antibiotics\" (68, 27%), \"no reason\" (62, 25%) and lack of research staff (33, 13%). Compliance with perioperative infection prevention occurred in 5 of 7 steps. Spontaneous placental separation occurred in 25 (83%) and Comfeel dressing in 29 (97%). Blinding was adequate for all staff groups. SSI surveillance occurred in 156 of 210 (74%) timepoints. SSI occurred in two patients who received pre-incisional cefazolin and were successfully treated as outpatients. Patient reported outcome questionnaires were completed at 136 of 180 (76%) timepoints. There was no difference in maternal health-related quality of life between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Feasibility was impacted by the high-risk population and patient desire for antibiotics. Adherence to perioperative infection prevention practices were high but incomplete. These study processes could be effectively applied in a larger population, targeting low risk maternity patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Prospectively registered 4/12/2019 with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12619001705178).</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"353"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938549/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cefazolin versus placebo for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in low-risk cesarean delivery: a feasibility blinded randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Victoria A Eley, Severine Navarro, Elizabeth Martin, Akwasi Amoako, Gunter Hartel, Christine Woods, Yan Lu, Jeffrey Lipman, Jason Roberts, Mimi Tang, Leonie Callaway\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12884-025-07484-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pre-incisional antibiotics are recommended for all patients having cesarean delivery, despite emerging concerns regarding effects on the infant. In this feasibility blinded randomized controlled trial we aimed to test research processes in low-risk women receiving cefazolin or placebo prior to elective cesarean delivery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The trial was prospectively registered (ACTRN12619001705178). Eligible women were aged ≥ 18 and < 40 years, ≥ 37 weeks gestation, at low risk of surgical site infection (SSI) and recruited from a single tertiary centre. We reported proportions of women eligible and consenting; adherence to perioperative infection prevention; blinding adequacy of staff using Bang's blinding index; SSI surveillance and diagnosis according to the Centre for Disease Control definitions and patient reported outcome measures using validated questionnaires up to 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We screened 1651 women, with 1245 (75%) ineligible based on body mass index or presence of diabetes. Of 287 eligible women, 30 were randomized (11%) with 15 in each group. Reasons for non-participation included \\\"wanting antibiotics\\\" (68, 27%), \\\"no reason\\\" (62, 25%) and lack of research staff (33, 13%). Compliance with perioperative infection prevention occurred in 5 of 7 steps. Spontaneous placental separation occurred in 25 (83%) and Comfeel dressing in 29 (97%). Blinding was adequate for all staff groups. SSI surveillance occurred in 156 of 210 (74%) timepoints. SSI occurred in two patients who received pre-incisional cefazolin and were successfully treated as outpatients. Patient reported outcome questionnaires were completed at 136 of 180 (76%) timepoints. There was no difference in maternal health-related quality of life between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Feasibility was impacted by the high-risk population and patient desire for antibiotics. Adherence to perioperative infection prevention practices were high but incomplete. These study processes could be effectively applied in a larger population, targeting low risk maternity patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Prospectively registered 4/12/2019 with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12619001705178).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"353\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938549/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07484-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07484-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:所有剖宫产患者都推荐使用切口前抗生素,尽管对婴儿的影响有新的担忧。在这项可行性盲法随机对照试验中,我们旨在测试在选择性剖宫产前接受头孢唑林或安慰剂的低风险妇女的研究过程。方法:前瞻性注册(ACTRN12619001705178)。符合条件的女性年龄≥18岁。结果:我们筛选了1651名女性,其中1245名(75%)因体重指数或存在糖尿病而不符合条件。在287名符合条件的女性中,30名随机(11%),每组15名。不参与的原因包括“需要抗生素”(68.27%)、“没有理由”(62.25%)和缺乏研究人员(33.13%)。围手术期7个步骤中有5个步骤符合预防感染的要求。自发性胎盘分离25例(83%),Comfeel敷料29例(97%)。对所有工作人员组采用盲法是足够的。210个时间点中有156个(74%)发生了SSI监测。2例接受切前头孢唑林治疗的患者发生SSI,并作为门诊患者成功治疗。患者报告的结果问卷在180个时间点中的136个(76%)完成。两组之间孕产妇健康相关生活质量没有差异。结论:高危人群和患者对抗生素的需求影响了可行性。围手术期感染预防措施的依从性很高,但不完整。这些研究过程可以有效地应用于更大的人群,针对低风险产妇患者。试验注册:2019年4月12日在澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12619001705178)前瞻性注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cefazolin versus placebo for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in low-risk cesarean delivery: a feasibility blinded randomized controlled trial.

Background: Pre-incisional antibiotics are recommended for all patients having cesarean delivery, despite emerging concerns regarding effects on the infant. In this feasibility blinded randomized controlled trial we aimed to test research processes in low-risk women receiving cefazolin or placebo prior to elective cesarean delivery.

Methods: The trial was prospectively registered (ACTRN12619001705178). Eligible women were aged ≥ 18 and < 40 years, ≥ 37 weeks gestation, at low risk of surgical site infection (SSI) and recruited from a single tertiary centre. We reported proportions of women eligible and consenting; adherence to perioperative infection prevention; blinding adequacy of staff using Bang's blinding index; SSI surveillance and diagnosis according to the Centre for Disease Control definitions and patient reported outcome measures using validated questionnaires up to 90 days.

Results: We screened 1651 women, with 1245 (75%) ineligible based on body mass index or presence of diabetes. Of 287 eligible women, 30 were randomized (11%) with 15 in each group. Reasons for non-participation included "wanting antibiotics" (68, 27%), "no reason" (62, 25%) and lack of research staff (33, 13%). Compliance with perioperative infection prevention occurred in 5 of 7 steps. Spontaneous placental separation occurred in 25 (83%) and Comfeel dressing in 29 (97%). Blinding was adequate for all staff groups. SSI surveillance occurred in 156 of 210 (74%) timepoints. SSI occurred in two patients who received pre-incisional cefazolin and were successfully treated as outpatients. Patient reported outcome questionnaires were completed at 136 of 180 (76%) timepoints. There was no difference in maternal health-related quality of life between the groups.

Conclusions: Feasibility was impacted by the high-risk population and patient desire for antibiotics. Adherence to perioperative infection prevention practices were high but incomplete. These study processes could be effectively applied in a larger population, targeting low risk maternity patients.

Trial registration: Prospectively registered 4/12/2019 with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12619001705178).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信