Beata Jacuś, Anna Milewska, Paweł Miękus, Marcin Konarzewski, Ludmiła Daniłowicz-Szymanowicz, Andrzej Lubiński, Grzegorz Grześk
{"title":"急性心肌梗死患者心房颤动的危险因素评估,特别关注超声心动图参数","authors":"Beata Jacuś, Anna Milewska, Paweł Miękus, Marcin Konarzewski, Ludmiła Daniłowicz-Szymanowicz, Andrzej Lubiński, Grzegorz Grześk","doi":"10.1002/clc.70114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia worldwide, affecting between 2% and 4% of population. The projected further progression is a reason to consider AF as a global epidemic problem. The efficiency in diagnosing new cases is still unsatisfactory.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The prospective study included 74 patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction. Echocardiography with advanced assessment of the left atrium was performed on all patients. R Statistical Software was used for statistical and graphical processing.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Atrial fibrillation was first diagnosed in 13.5% of patients with acute myocardial infarction, and in 5.4% of the patients the diagnosis was made during the long-term follow-up period. Analysis of the data collected showed that patients with arrythmia were older (71.79 vs 63.5 years; <i>p</i> = 0.047), had a higher BMI (30.15 vs 26.76 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; <i>p</i> = 0.039) and had a higher CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub> VASc score (4.14 vs 3.02 points). Among the echocardiographic parameters, those that significantly differentiated patients with arrythmia included larger LA area (21.62 vs 18.84 cm<sup>2</sup>; <i>p</i> = 0.027), lower LAEF 4CH (43.46 vs 55.93%; <i>p</i> = 0.029), lower LAEF mean (44.08 vs 55.63%; <i>p</i> = 0.014), lower EI (1.03 vs 1.49; <i>p</i> = 0.032), lower LASr 4CH (19.08 vs 26.72%; <i>p</i> = 0.020), lower LASr mean (18.62 vs 26.73%; <i>p</i> = 0.009), higher E/e’ (12.62 vs 9.58; <i>p</i> = 0.01), higher LASI (0.95 vs 0.45; <i>p</i> = 0.016).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Among the echocardiographic parameters, those that may indicate an increased risk of atrial fibrillation and could be implemented in clinical practice are LASr and LASI. Determining them in risk profiling and the implementation of individualized arrhythmia detection methods could increase diagnostic efficiency.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"48 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clc.70114","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Risk Factors for Atrial Fibrillation With a Particular Focus on Echocardiographic Parameters, in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction\",\"authors\":\"Beata Jacuś, Anna Milewska, Paweł Miękus, Marcin Konarzewski, Ludmiła Daniłowicz-Szymanowicz, Andrzej Lubiński, Grzegorz Grześk\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/clc.70114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia worldwide, affecting between 2% and 4% of population. The projected further progression is a reason to consider AF as a global epidemic problem. The efficiency in diagnosing new cases is still unsatisfactory.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The prospective study included 74 patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction. Echocardiography with advanced assessment of the left atrium was performed on all patients. R Statistical Software was used for statistical and graphical processing.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Atrial fibrillation was first diagnosed in 13.5% of patients with acute myocardial infarction, and in 5.4% of the patients the diagnosis was made during the long-term follow-up period. Analysis of the data collected showed that patients with arrythmia were older (71.79 vs 63.5 years; <i>p</i> = 0.047), had a higher BMI (30.15 vs 26.76 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; <i>p</i> = 0.039) and had a higher CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub> VASc score (4.14 vs 3.02 points). Among the echocardiographic parameters, those that significantly differentiated patients with arrythmia included larger LA area (21.62 vs 18.84 cm<sup>2</sup>; <i>p</i> = 0.027), lower LAEF 4CH (43.46 vs 55.93%; <i>p</i> = 0.029), lower LAEF mean (44.08 vs 55.63%; <i>p</i> = 0.014), lower EI (1.03 vs 1.49; <i>p</i> = 0.032), lower LASr 4CH (19.08 vs 26.72%; <i>p</i> = 0.020), lower LASr mean (18.62 vs 26.73%; <i>p</i> = 0.009), higher E/e’ (12.62 vs 9.58; <i>p</i> = 0.01), higher LASI (0.95 vs 0.45; <i>p</i> = 0.016).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Among the echocardiographic parameters, those that may indicate an increased risk of atrial fibrillation and could be implemented in clinical practice are LASr and LASI. Determining them in risk profiling and the implementation of individualized arrhythmia detection methods could increase diagnostic efficiency.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"48 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clc.70114\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.70114\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.70114","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
房颤是世界范围内最常见的心律失常,影响2%至4%的人口。预计的进一步进展是将房颤视为全球流行病问题的理由。诊断新病例的效率仍不令人满意。方法对74例急性心肌梗死住院患者进行前瞻性研究。对所有患者进行超声心动图和左心房的高级评估。使用R统计软件进行统计和图形处理。结果13.5%的急性心肌梗死患者首次确诊房颤,5.4%的患者在长期随访期间确诊房颤。数据分析显示,心律失常患者年龄较大(71.79 vs 63.5岁;p = 0.047), BMI较高(30.15 vs 26.76 kg/m2;p = 0.039), CHA2DS2 VASc评分较高(4.14分对3.02分)。超声心动图参数中,LA面积较大(21.62 vs 18.84 cm2;p = 0.027), LAEF 4CH较低(43.46 vs 55.93%;p = 0.029), LAEF平均值较低(44.08 vs 55.63%;p = 0.014),较低的EI (1.03 vs 1.49;p = 0.032),较低的LASr 4CH (19.08 vs 26.72%;p = 0.020),较低的LASr平均值(18.62 vs 26.73%;p = 0.009),较高的E/ E′(12.62 vs 9.58;p = 0.01), LASI较高(0.95 vs 0.45;p = 0.016)。结论超声心动图参数中,LASr和LASI可能提示心房颤动风险增加,可应用于临床。在风险分析中确定这些因素并实施个体化心律失常检测方法可以提高诊断效率。
Assessment of Risk Factors for Atrial Fibrillation With a Particular Focus on Echocardiographic Parameters, in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
Background
Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia worldwide, affecting between 2% and 4% of population. The projected further progression is a reason to consider AF as a global epidemic problem. The efficiency in diagnosing new cases is still unsatisfactory.
Methods
The prospective study included 74 patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction. Echocardiography with advanced assessment of the left atrium was performed on all patients. R Statistical Software was used for statistical and graphical processing.
Results
Atrial fibrillation was first diagnosed in 13.5% of patients with acute myocardial infarction, and in 5.4% of the patients the diagnosis was made during the long-term follow-up period. Analysis of the data collected showed that patients with arrythmia were older (71.79 vs 63.5 years; p = 0.047), had a higher BMI (30.15 vs 26.76 kg/m2; p = 0.039) and had a higher CHA2DS2 VASc score (4.14 vs 3.02 points). Among the echocardiographic parameters, those that significantly differentiated patients with arrythmia included larger LA area (21.62 vs 18.84 cm2; p = 0.027), lower LAEF 4CH (43.46 vs 55.93%; p = 0.029), lower LAEF mean (44.08 vs 55.63%; p = 0.014), lower EI (1.03 vs 1.49; p = 0.032), lower LASr 4CH (19.08 vs 26.72%; p = 0.020), lower LASr mean (18.62 vs 26.73%; p = 0.009), higher E/e’ (12.62 vs 9.58; p = 0.01), higher LASI (0.95 vs 0.45; p = 0.016).
Conclusions
Among the echocardiographic parameters, those that may indicate an increased risk of atrial fibrillation and could be implemented in clinical practice are LASr and LASI. Determining them in risk profiling and the implementation of individualized arrhythmia detection methods could increase diagnostic efficiency.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Cardiology provides a fully Gold Open Access forum for the publication of original clinical research, as well as brief reviews of diagnostic and therapeutic issues in cardiovascular medicine and cardiovascular surgery.
The journal includes Clinical Investigations, Reviews, free standing editorials and commentaries, and bonus online-only content.
The journal also publishes supplements, Expert Panel Discussions, sponsored clinical Reviews, Trial Designs, and Quality and Outcomes.