推进土壤质地和有机碳空间变异性评估:通过数据融合整合近端γ射线能谱和电磁感应进行非站点分析

IF 5.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Angelica De Ros , Ilaria Piccoli , Luigi Sartori , Beatrice Portelli , Giuseppe Serra , Nicola Dal Ferro , Francesco Morari
{"title":"推进土壤质地和有机碳空间变异性评估:通过数据融合整合近端γ射线能谱和电磁感应进行非站点分析","authors":"Angelica De Ros ,&nbsp;Ilaria Piccoli ,&nbsp;Luigi Sartori ,&nbsp;Beatrice Portelli ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Serra ,&nbsp;Nicola Dal Ferro ,&nbsp;Francesco Morari","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2025.108980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study we tested the combination of two proximal sensors –an electromagnetic conductivity meter (EMI) and a gamma(γ)-ray detector– to estimate the variability of some soil properties. The hypothesis was that the employment of data fusion techniques would provide a more comprehensive description of soil texture and soil organic carbon (SOC) content compared to using single sensors alone. This approach aimed to capture a spectrum of characteristics across various mineral and organic alluvial soils. Field surveys covering more than 60 ha were conducted in 2019 on five agricultural experimental sites, whose texture ranged from silty-clay to silty- and sandy-loam and SOC from 0.5 % to 21.9 %. A total of 354 undisturbed soil samples (0–30 cm) was collected and soil properties such as granulometry, bulk density and SOC concentration and stock determined. The fusion of proximal sensing data of apparent electrical conductivity (EC<sub>a</sub>) and γ-ray radionuclides (total counts –TC–, <sup>238</sup>U, <sup>232</sup>Th, <sup>40</sup>K) combined with multivariate analysis was applied to describe soil spatial variability. Partial leas square regression (PLSR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models were trained and tested to predict the variability in soil properties within and between sites. Results showed that data fusion captured the soil spatial variability within and between fields, with a predictive ability (test set) to explain up to 88 % of clay and 74 % of SOC stock variability when all mineral soils were embedded in the ANN model. The combination of TC and EC<sub>a</sub> was particularly effective in explaining texture and SOC heterogeneity within and across fields. In contrast, different responses were observed for single radionuclides, either <sup>238</sup>U, <sup>232</sup>Th, <sup>40</sup>K, or their ratios, within each field, that likely identified site-specific radioisotope enrichment and/or depletion processes. In conclusion, data fusion of EMI and γ-ray detectors accurately predicted soil texture and SOC across soils from alluvial origin.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 108980"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing soil texture and organic carbon spatial variability assessment: Integrating proximal γ-ray spectroscopy and electromagnetic induction via data fusion for site-independent analysis\",\"authors\":\"Angelica De Ros ,&nbsp;Ilaria Piccoli ,&nbsp;Luigi Sartori ,&nbsp;Beatrice Portelli ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Serra ,&nbsp;Nicola Dal Ferro ,&nbsp;Francesco Morari\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.catena.2025.108980\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In this study we tested the combination of two proximal sensors –an electromagnetic conductivity meter (EMI) and a gamma(γ)-ray detector– to estimate the variability of some soil properties. The hypothesis was that the employment of data fusion techniques would provide a more comprehensive description of soil texture and soil organic carbon (SOC) content compared to using single sensors alone. This approach aimed to capture a spectrum of characteristics across various mineral and organic alluvial soils. Field surveys covering more than 60 ha were conducted in 2019 on five agricultural experimental sites, whose texture ranged from silty-clay to silty- and sandy-loam and SOC from 0.5 % to 21.9 %. A total of 354 undisturbed soil samples (0–30 cm) was collected and soil properties such as granulometry, bulk density and SOC concentration and stock determined. The fusion of proximal sensing data of apparent electrical conductivity (EC<sub>a</sub>) and γ-ray radionuclides (total counts –TC–, <sup>238</sup>U, <sup>232</sup>Th, <sup>40</sup>K) combined with multivariate analysis was applied to describe soil spatial variability. Partial leas square regression (PLSR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models were trained and tested to predict the variability in soil properties within and between sites. Results showed that data fusion captured the soil spatial variability within and between fields, with a predictive ability (test set) to explain up to 88 % of clay and 74 % of SOC stock variability when all mineral soils were embedded in the ANN model. The combination of TC and EC<sub>a</sub> was particularly effective in explaining texture and SOC heterogeneity within and across fields. In contrast, different responses were observed for single radionuclides, either <sup>238</sup>U, <sup>232</sup>Th, <sup>40</sup>K, or their ratios, within each field, that likely identified site-specific radioisotope enrichment and/or depletion processes. In conclusion, data fusion of EMI and γ-ray detectors accurately predicted soil texture and SOC across soils from alluvial origin.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catena\",\"volume\":\"254 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108980\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catena\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816225002826\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816225002826","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,我们测试了两个近端传感器的组合——电磁电导率仪(EMI)和伽马(γ)射线探测器——来估计一些土壤特性的可变性。其假设是,与单独使用单个传感器相比,采用数据融合技术可以提供更全面的土壤质地和土壤有机碳(SOC)含量描述。这种方法旨在捕捉各种矿物和有机冲积土壤的一系列特征。2019年,在五个农业试验点进行了超过60公顷的实地调查,其质地从粉质粘土到粉质和砂质壤土,有机碳含量从0.5%到21.9%不等。收集原状土壤354份(0 ~ 30 cm)样品,测定土壤粒度、容重、有机碳浓度和储量等特性。采用视电导率(ECa)近端遥感数据与γ射线核素(总计数- tc -、238U、232Th、40K)数据融合,结合多变量分析对土壤空间变异性进行了描述。利用偏最小二乘回归(PLSR)和人工神经网络(ANN)模型进行了训练和测试,以预测站点内和站点间土壤性质的变化。结果表明,当所有矿质土壤都嵌入到人工神经网络模型中时,数据融合捕获了农田内部和农田之间的土壤空间变异性,具有预测能力(测试集),可以解释高达88%的粘土和74%的有机碳储量变异性。TC和ECa的结合特别有效地解释了田内和跨田的质地和SOC异质性。相比之下,对单个放射性核素(238U、232Th、40K或它们的比值)在每个场中观察到不同的反应,这可能确定了特定地点的放射性同位素富集和/或耗尽过程。综上所述,电磁干扰和γ射线探测器的数据融合能够准确预测冲积源土壤的土壤质地和有机碳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advancing soil texture and organic carbon spatial variability assessment: Integrating proximal γ-ray spectroscopy and electromagnetic induction via data fusion for site-independent analysis
In this study we tested the combination of two proximal sensors –an electromagnetic conductivity meter (EMI) and a gamma(γ)-ray detector– to estimate the variability of some soil properties. The hypothesis was that the employment of data fusion techniques would provide a more comprehensive description of soil texture and soil organic carbon (SOC) content compared to using single sensors alone. This approach aimed to capture a spectrum of characteristics across various mineral and organic alluvial soils. Field surveys covering more than 60 ha were conducted in 2019 on five agricultural experimental sites, whose texture ranged from silty-clay to silty- and sandy-loam and SOC from 0.5 % to 21.9 %. A total of 354 undisturbed soil samples (0–30 cm) was collected and soil properties such as granulometry, bulk density and SOC concentration and stock determined. The fusion of proximal sensing data of apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) and γ-ray radionuclides (total counts –TC–, 238U, 232Th, 40K) combined with multivariate analysis was applied to describe soil spatial variability. Partial leas square regression (PLSR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models were trained and tested to predict the variability in soil properties within and between sites. Results showed that data fusion captured the soil spatial variability within and between fields, with a predictive ability (test set) to explain up to 88 % of clay and 74 % of SOC stock variability when all mineral soils were embedded in the ANN model. The combination of TC and ECa was particularly effective in explaining texture and SOC heterogeneity within and across fields. In contrast, different responses were observed for single radionuclides, either 238U, 232Th, 40K, or their ratios, within each field, that likely identified site-specific radioisotope enrichment and/or depletion processes. In conclusion, data fusion of EMI and γ-ray detectors accurately predicted soil texture and SOC across soils from alluvial origin.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Catena
Catena 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
816
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment. Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信