重新组织门诊脊柱服务提高了效率和患者满意度

IF 1.9 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Arkan Sam Sayed-Noor , Thomas Torstensson , Björn Knutsson
{"title":"重新组织门诊脊柱服务提高了效率和患者满意度","authors":"Arkan Sam Sayed-Noor ,&nbsp;Thomas Torstensson ,&nbsp;Björn Knutsson","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2025.104245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The workload in orthopedic outpatient departments is increasing while the available medical resources are often limited.</div></div><div><h3>Research questions</h3><div>Can reorganizing the outpatient work routines for referred patients with spinal disorders improve cost-effectiveness and patient's experience of care (PEC) without negatively affecting the waiting time required for the healthcare guarantee?</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>We compared our standard routine (control group) to a new routine (study group) for evaluating referrals of patients with spinal complaints. In the control group, the referral was first evaluated by a spinal surgeon, and when deemed indicated, a visit to a spinal surgeon was booked. In the study group, a spinal surgeon first evaluated all referral notes and either assigned a spinal surgeon or a physiotherapist to meet the patient, depending on certain criteria. If considered eligible for surgical intervention, the patient is appointed for a follow-up visit to the spinal surgeon. For both groups, calculations were made for the number of waiting days and visits, as well as the cost. Also, we compared the PEC between the two groups through telephone interviews.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The number of waiting days and visits, as well as the cost, were significantly reduced (p &lt; 0.01) in the study group. Also, the study group showed slightly higher mean values for the PEC components, with significant differences related to the waiting time, treatment with respect, and taking account of patient knowledge.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusions</h3><div>Reorganizing outpatient work routines could eliminate the need for locum doctors while maintaining patient satisfaction and reducing costs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 104245"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reorganizing outpatient spine services increased efficiency and patient satisfaction\",\"authors\":\"Arkan Sam Sayed-Noor ,&nbsp;Thomas Torstensson ,&nbsp;Björn Knutsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bas.2025.104245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The workload in orthopedic outpatient departments is increasing while the available medical resources are often limited.</div></div><div><h3>Research questions</h3><div>Can reorganizing the outpatient work routines for referred patients with spinal disorders improve cost-effectiveness and patient's experience of care (PEC) without negatively affecting the waiting time required for the healthcare guarantee?</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>We compared our standard routine (control group) to a new routine (study group) for evaluating referrals of patients with spinal complaints. In the control group, the referral was first evaluated by a spinal surgeon, and when deemed indicated, a visit to a spinal surgeon was booked. In the study group, a spinal surgeon first evaluated all referral notes and either assigned a spinal surgeon or a physiotherapist to meet the patient, depending on certain criteria. If considered eligible for surgical intervention, the patient is appointed for a follow-up visit to the spinal surgeon. For both groups, calculations were made for the number of waiting days and visits, as well as the cost. Also, we compared the PEC between the two groups through telephone interviews.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The number of waiting days and visits, as well as the cost, were significantly reduced (p &lt; 0.01) in the study group. Also, the study group showed slightly higher mean values for the PEC components, with significant differences related to the waiting time, treatment with respect, and taking account of patient knowledge.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusions</h3><div>Reorganizing outpatient work routines could eliminate the need for locum doctors while maintaining patient satisfaction and reducing costs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain & spine\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104245\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain & spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529425000645\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529425000645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读骨科门诊的工作量不断增加,而可用的医疗资源往往有限。研究问题:重新组织转诊脊柱疾病患者的门诊工作程序是否可以提高成本效益和患者护理体验(PEC),而不会对医疗保障所需的等待时间产生负面影响?材料和方法我们比较标准常规(对照组)和新常规(研究组)来评估脊柱疾病患者的转诊情况。在对照组中,转诊首先由脊柱外科医生进行评估,当认为有必要时,就预约脊柱外科医生。在研究组中,脊柱外科医生首先评估所有转诊记录,并根据某些标准指定脊柱外科医生或物理治疗师来满足患者。如果认为符合手术干预的条件,则指定患者对脊柱外科医生进行随访。对于这两组患者,都计算了等待的天数和就诊次数,以及费用。同时,我们通过电话访谈比较了两组之间的PEC。结果患者的候诊天数、就诊次数及费用均显著降低(p <;0.01)。此外,研究组显示PEC成分的平均值略高,与等待时间、尊重治疗和考虑患者知识相关的显着差异。讨论与结论重组门诊工作流程可以在保持患者满意度和降低成本的同时减少对门诊医生的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reorganizing outpatient spine services increased efficiency and patient satisfaction

Introduction

The workload in orthopedic outpatient departments is increasing while the available medical resources are often limited.

Research questions

Can reorganizing the outpatient work routines for referred patients with spinal disorders improve cost-effectiveness and patient's experience of care (PEC) without negatively affecting the waiting time required for the healthcare guarantee?

Material and methods

We compared our standard routine (control group) to a new routine (study group) for evaluating referrals of patients with spinal complaints. In the control group, the referral was first evaluated by a spinal surgeon, and when deemed indicated, a visit to a spinal surgeon was booked. In the study group, a spinal surgeon first evaluated all referral notes and either assigned a spinal surgeon or a physiotherapist to meet the patient, depending on certain criteria. If considered eligible for surgical intervention, the patient is appointed for a follow-up visit to the spinal surgeon. For both groups, calculations were made for the number of waiting days and visits, as well as the cost. Also, we compared the PEC between the two groups through telephone interviews.

Results

The number of waiting days and visits, as well as the cost, were significantly reduced (p < 0.01) in the study group. Also, the study group showed slightly higher mean values for the PEC components, with significant differences related to the waiting time, treatment with respect, and taking account of patient knowledge.

Discussion and conclusions

Reorganizing outpatient work routines could eliminate the need for locum doctors while maintaining patient satisfaction and reducing costs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain & spine
Brain & spine Surgery
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信