在线英语和西班牙语骨科手术麻醉患者教育材料的可读性

Mariana Restrepo , Brocha Z. Stern , Garrett W. Burnett , Chang Park , Jashvant Poeran
{"title":"在线英语和西班牙语骨科手术麻醉患者教育材料的可读性","authors":"Mariana Restrepo ,&nbsp;Brocha Z. Stern ,&nbsp;Garrett W. Burnett ,&nbsp;Chang Park ,&nbsp;Jashvant Poeran","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>With the increasing utilisation of regional anaesthesia for orthopaedic procedures, it is imperative that related online patient education materials (PEMs) be easily retrievable, comprehensive, and readable by the general population, irrespective of the language they are written in. Therefore, we compared the readability levels of online PEMs available in English and Spanish for anaesthesia related to total hip, knee, and shoulder joint replacements.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Six pairs (English and Spanish) of search terms were entered into Google and used to identify relevant online PEMs. Results for English search terms were analysed for readability using the Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Fry Graph (FG), Simple Measures of Gobbledygook (SMOG) Index, and Gunning Fog Index scores, and for Spanish search terms using the Fernandez-Huerta Reading Ease (FHRE), the Gilliam-Peña-Mountain Grade Level (GPMGL), the Spanish SMOG (SOL), and Indice de Legibilidad de Flesch-Szigriszt (INFLESZ) scores. Scores were compared between languages if the Spanish-language calculator was a validated adaptation of the English one (FRE <em>vs</em> FHRE; FG <em>vs</em> GPMGL; SMOG <em>vs</em> SOL).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 180 and 146 relevant websites were retrieved across all six English language and Spanish-language search terms, respectively. Generally, the FRE and FG scores for the English search results corresponded to college-level material and the SMOG score reflected a 10th grade reading level. In contrast, the FHRE, GPMGL, and SOL scores for Spanish search results corresponded to 10th–12th grade reading levels, and the INFLESZ to ‘Difficult’/‘Normal’ levels.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings reinforce past literature describing English and Spanish-language orthopaedic anaesthesia PEMs being written at far higher reading levels than the recommended 5th to 8th grade reading level. Interestingly, English PEMs were less readable than their Spanish counterparts, yet, they were more available than related Spanish PEMs overall.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100388"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The readability of online English and Spanish patient education materials on anaesthesia for orthopaedic surgery\",\"authors\":\"Mariana Restrepo ,&nbsp;Brocha Z. Stern ,&nbsp;Garrett W. Burnett ,&nbsp;Chang Park ,&nbsp;Jashvant Poeran\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>With the increasing utilisation of regional anaesthesia for orthopaedic procedures, it is imperative that related online patient education materials (PEMs) be easily retrievable, comprehensive, and readable by the general population, irrespective of the language they are written in. Therefore, we compared the readability levels of online PEMs available in English and Spanish for anaesthesia related to total hip, knee, and shoulder joint replacements.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Six pairs (English and Spanish) of search terms were entered into Google and used to identify relevant online PEMs. Results for English search terms were analysed for readability using the Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Fry Graph (FG), Simple Measures of Gobbledygook (SMOG) Index, and Gunning Fog Index scores, and for Spanish search terms using the Fernandez-Huerta Reading Ease (FHRE), the Gilliam-Peña-Mountain Grade Level (GPMGL), the Spanish SMOG (SOL), and Indice de Legibilidad de Flesch-Szigriszt (INFLESZ) scores. Scores were compared between languages if the Spanish-language calculator was a validated adaptation of the English one (FRE <em>vs</em> FHRE; FG <em>vs</em> GPMGL; SMOG <em>vs</em> SOL).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 180 and 146 relevant websites were retrieved across all six English language and Spanish-language search terms, respectively. Generally, the FRE and FG scores for the English search results corresponded to college-level material and the SMOG score reflected a 10th grade reading level. In contrast, the FHRE, GPMGL, and SOL scores for Spanish search results corresponded to 10th–12th grade reading levels, and the INFLESZ to ‘Difficult’/‘Normal’ levels.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings reinforce past literature describing English and Spanish-language orthopaedic anaesthesia PEMs being written at far higher reading levels than the recommended 5th to 8th grade reading level. Interestingly, English PEMs were less readable than their Spanish counterparts, yet, they were more available than related Spanish PEMs overall.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJA open\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100388\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJA open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609625000127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJA open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609625000127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着骨科手术中区域麻醉的使用越来越多,无论使用何种语言,相关的在线患者教育材料(PEMs)都必须易于检索,全面且可被普通人群阅读。因此,我们比较了与全髋关节、膝关节和肩关节置换术相关的英语和西班牙语在线PEMs的可读性水平。方法在谷歌中输入6对(英语和西班牙语)检索词,用于识别相关的在线词条。使用Flesch Reading Ease (FRE)、Fry Graph (FG)、Simple Measures of Gobbledygook (SMOG) Index和Gunning Fog Index分数分析英文搜索词的可读性,使用Fernandez-Huerta Reading Ease (FHRE)、Gilliam-Peña-Mountain Grade Level (GPMGL)、西班牙语SMOG (SOL)和Index de Legibilidad de Flesch- szigriszt (INFLESZ)分数分析西班牙语搜索词的可读性。如果西班牙语计算器是经过验证的英语计算器的改编版,则比较语言之间的分数(FRE vs FHRE;FG vs GPMGL;烟雾vs SOL)。结果总体而言,在所有六种英语和西班牙语搜索条件下,分别检索到180个和146个相关网站。一般来说,英语搜索结果的FRE和FG分数对应于大学水平的材料,而SMOG分数反映了10年级的阅读水平。相比之下,西班牙语搜索结果的FHRE, GPMGL和SOL分数对应于10 - 12年级的阅读水平,而INFLESZ则对应于“困难”/“正常”水平。这些发现强化了以往文献中描述的英语和西班牙语骨科麻醉医师的阅读水平远高于推荐的5至8年级阅读水平。有趣的是,与西班牙语相比,英语的PEMs可读性较差,但总体而言,它们比相关的西班牙语PEMs更容易获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The readability of online English and Spanish patient education materials on anaesthesia for orthopaedic surgery

Background

With the increasing utilisation of regional anaesthesia for orthopaedic procedures, it is imperative that related online patient education materials (PEMs) be easily retrievable, comprehensive, and readable by the general population, irrespective of the language they are written in. Therefore, we compared the readability levels of online PEMs available in English and Spanish for anaesthesia related to total hip, knee, and shoulder joint replacements.

Methods

Six pairs (English and Spanish) of search terms were entered into Google and used to identify relevant online PEMs. Results for English search terms were analysed for readability using the Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Fry Graph (FG), Simple Measures of Gobbledygook (SMOG) Index, and Gunning Fog Index scores, and for Spanish search terms using the Fernandez-Huerta Reading Ease (FHRE), the Gilliam-Peña-Mountain Grade Level (GPMGL), the Spanish SMOG (SOL), and Indice de Legibilidad de Flesch-Szigriszt (INFLESZ) scores. Scores were compared between languages if the Spanish-language calculator was a validated adaptation of the English one (FRE vs FHRE; FG vs GPMGL; SMOG vs SOL).

Results

Overall, 180 and 146 relevant websites were retrieved across all six English language and Spanish-language search terms, respectively. Generally, the FRE and FG scores for the English search results corresponded to college-level material and the SMOG score reflected a 10th grade reading level. In contrast, the FHRE, GPMGL, and SOL scores for Spanish search results corresponded to 10th–12th grade reading levels, and the INFLESZ to ‘Difficult’/‘Normal’ levels.

Conclusions

These findings reinforce past literature describing English and Spanish-language orthopaedic anaesthesia PEMs being written at far higher reading levels than the recommended 5th to 8th grade reading level. Interestingly, English PEMs were less readable than their Spanish counterparts, yet, they were more available than related Spanish PEMs overall.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJA open
BJA open Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
83 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信