需求不确定性和风险规避下的北海地区电力系统规划

IF 7.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Lars Skjelbred Nygaard, Emil Dimanchev, Magnus Korpås
{"title":"需求不确定性和风险规避下的北海地区电力系统规划","authors":"Lars Skjelbred Nygaard,&nbsp;Emil Dimanchev,&nbsp;Magnus Korpås","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2025.101664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Electricity demand is increasingly difficult to predict due the uncertain timing and scale of future electrification, data center consumption, and electrolytic hydrogen adoption. This poses a new source of risk for power system planning. Though planners are often risk-averse, energy system modeling commonly takes a risk-neutral perspective. Here, we consider the implications of risk aversion concerning demand uncertainty for the optimal planning of power systems surrounding the North Sea. This region is both facing considerable demand uncertainty and expected to see substantial new investment in electricity generation capacity. In our exploratory experiments, optimal risk-averse planning under demand uncertainty features a higher share of renewable and storage investment by 2040, our planning horizon, compared to risk-neutral planning. As a result, risk-averse planning also leads to lower expected CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> emissions in our case study. Overall, our results suggest that renewables and storage can provide a hedge against demand uncertainty.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 101664"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Power system planning in the North Sea area under demand uncertainty and risk aversion\",\"authors\":\"Lars Skjelbred Nygaard,&nbsp;Emil Dimanchev,&nbsp;Magnus Korpås\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esr.2025.101664\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Electricity demand is increasingly difficult to predict due the uncertain timing and scale of future electrification, data center consumption, and electrolytic hydrogen adoption. This poses a new source of risk for power system planning. Though planners are often risk-averse, energy system modeling commonly takes a risk-neutral perspective. Here, we consider the implications of risk aversion concerning demand uncertainty for the optimal planning of power systems surrounding the North Sea. This region is both facing considerable demand uncertainty and expected to see substantial new investment in electricity generation capacity. In our exploratory experiments, optimal risk-averse planning under demand uncertainty features a higher share of renewable and storage investment by 2040, our planning horizon, compared to risk-neutral planning. As a result, risk-averse planning also leads to lower expected CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> emissions in our case study. Overall, our results suggest that renewables and storage can provide a hedge against demand uncertainty.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Strategy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"59 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101664\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Strategy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X25000276\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X25000276","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于未来电气化、数据中心消费和电解氢采用的不确定时间和规模,电力需求越来越难以预测。这给电力系统规划带来了新的风险来源。尽管规划者往往厌恶风险,但能源系统建模通常采取风险中性的观点。在这里,我们考虑了风险规避对北海周围电力系统最优规划的影响。该地区既面临着相当大的需求不确定性,又有望在发电能力方面看到大量的新投资。在我们的探索性实验中,与风险中性规划相比,需求不确定性下的最优风险厌恶规划在2040年(我们的规划范围)具有更高的可再生能源和储能投资份额。因此,在我们的案例研究中,规避风险的规划也导致了较低的预期二氧化碳排放量。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,可再生能源和储能可以对冲需求的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Power system planning in the North Sea area under demand uncertainty and risk aversion
Electricity demand is increasingly difficult to predict due the uncertain timing and scale of future electrification, data center consumption, and electrolytic hydrogen adoption. This poses a new source of risk for power system planning. Though planners are often risk-averse, energy system modeling commonly takes a risk-neutral perspective. Here, we consider the implications of risk aversion concerning demand uncertainty for the optimal planning of power systems surrounding the North Sea. This region is both facing considerable demand uncertainty and expected to see substantial new investment in electricity generation capacity. In our exploratory experiments, optimal risk-averse planning under demand uncertainty features a higher share of renewable and storage investment by 2040, our planning horizon, compared to risk-neutral planning. As a result, risk-averse planning also leads to lower expected CO2 emissions in our case study. Overall, our results suggest that renewables and storage can provide a hedge against demand uncertainty.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信