从腹腔镜到机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术过渡期间的尿失禁结果:一位外科医生在澳大利亚区域中心的经验

Basil Razi , Dane Cole-Clark , Duncan Self , Mark Louie-Johnsun
{"title":"从腹腔镜到机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术过渡期间的尿失禁结果:一位外科医生在澳大利亚区域中心的经验","authors":"Basil Razi ,&nbsp;Dane Cole-Clark ,&nbsp;Duncan Self ,&nbsp;Mark Louie-Johnsun","doi":"10.1016/j.contre.2025.100079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction &amp; Objectives:</h3><div>Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) is becoming standard of care for prostate cancer patients requiring surgical intervention. Postoperative continence significantly impacts patients’ quality of life, making functional outcomes a critical focus in the evolution of surgical techniques. Alternative methods, including open and laparoscopic techniques, have been superseded with increased availability of robotic units within Australia. This study aims to review an experienced laparoscopic surgeon’s transition to robotic prostatectomy and the impact on continence.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>Prospective data collection included patient demographics, surgical method, and pad usage at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. The final 100 laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) cases (May 2019–August 2021) were compared with the first 100 RARP cases (August 2021–February 2023), all performed by the same surgeon. Continence rates were assessed using patient-reported pad usage.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>The mean age was similar between LRP (65.3 years) and RARP (65.4 years) groups. Continence rates at 3 and 12 months were 67.0% and 90.4% for LRP patients versus 78% and 94% for RARP patients. Odds ratio analysis indicated LRP patients were 1.75 and 1.66 times more likely to be incontinent at 3 and 12 months, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>RARP demonstrated higher continence rates without evidence of a learning curve during the transition from LRP. These findings underscore the potential for improved patient outcomes with wider adoption of robotic systems in Australia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100330,"journal":{"name":"Continence Reports","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100079"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urinary continence outcomes during the transition from laparoscopic to robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: A single surgeon’s Australian regional centre experience\",\"authors\":\"Basil Razi ,&nbsp;Dane Cole-Clark ,&nbsp;Duncan Self ,&nbsp;Mark Louie-Johnsun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.contre.2025.100079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction &amp; Objectives:</h3><div>Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) is becoming standard of care for prostate cancer patients requiring surgical intervention. Postoperative continence significantly impacts patients’ quality of life, making functional outcomes a critical focus in the evolution of surgical techniques. Alternative methods, including open and laparoscopic techniques, have been superseded with increased availability of robotic units within Australia. This study aims to review an experienced laparoscopic surgeon’s transition to robotic prostatectomy and the impact on continence.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>Prospective data collection included patient demographics, surgical method, and pad usage at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. The final 100 laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) cases (May 2019–August 2021) were compared with the first 100 RARP cases (August 2021–February 2023), all performed by the same surgeon. Continence rates were assessed using patient-reported pad usage.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>The mean age was similar between LRP (65.3 years) and RARP (65.4 years) groups. Continence rates at 3 and 12 months were 67.0% and 90.4% for LRP patients versus 78% and 94% for RARP patients. Odds ratio analysis indicated LRP patients were 1.75 and 1.66 times more likely to be incontinent at 3 and 12 months, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>RARP demonstrated higher continence rates without evidence of a learning curve during the transition from LRP. These findings underscore the potential for improved patient outcomes with wider adoption of robotic systems in Australia.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Continence Reports\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100079\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Continence Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277297452500002X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Continence Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277297452500002X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍,目的:机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)正在成为需要手术干预的前列腺癌患者的标准治疗方法。术后尿失禁显著影响患者的生活质量,使功能结局成为外科技术发展的关键焦点。替代方法,包括开放和腹腔镜技术,已经取代了越来越多的机器人单位在澳大利亚。本研究旨在回顾一位经验丰富的腹腔镜外科医生向机器人前列腺切除术的过渡及其对尿失禁的影响。方法:前瞻性数据收集包括术后3个月和12个月的患者人口统计学、手术方法和尿垫使用情况。最后100例腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(LRP)病例(2019年5月- 2021年8月)与前100例RARP病例(2021年8月- 2023年2月)进行比较,所有病例均由同一外科医生进行。根据患者报告的尿垫使用情况评估尿失禁率。结果:LRP组与RARP组患者平均年龄相近(65.3岁)。LRP患者3个月和12个月的尿失禁率分别为67.0%和90.4%,而RARP患者为78%和94%。优势比分析显示,LRP患者在3个月和12个月时发生尿失禁的可能性分别是1.75倍和1.66倍。结论:在从LRP过渡到rrp的过程中,RARP显示出更高的控制率,没有证据表明有学习曲线。这些发现强调了在澳大利亚广泛采用机器人系统可以改善患者预后的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Urinary continence outcomes during the transition from laparoscopic to robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: A single surgeon’s Australian regional centre experience

Introduction & Objectives:

Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) is becoming standard of care for prostate cancer patients requiring surgical intervention. Postoperative continence significantly impacts patients’ quality of life, making functional outcomes a critical focus in the evolution of surgical techniques. Alternative methods, including open and laparoscopic techniques, have been superseded with increased availability of robotic units within Australia. This study aims to review an experienced laparoscopic surgeon’s transition to robotic prostatectomy and the impact on continence.

Methods:

Prospective data collection included patient demographics, surgical method, and pad usage at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. The final 100 laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) cases (May 2019–August 2021) were compared with the first 100 RARP cases (August 2021–February 2023), all performed by the same surgeon. Continence rates were assessed using patient-reported pad usage.

Results:

The mean age was similar between LRP (65.3 years) and RARP (65.4 years) groups. Continence rates at 3 and 12 months were 67.0% and 90.4% for LRP patients versus 78% and 94% for RARP patients. Odds ratio analysis indicated LRP patients were 1.75 and 1.66 times more likely to be incontinent at 3 and 12 months, respectively.

Conclusion:

RARP demonstrated higher continence rates without evidence of a learning curve during the transition from LRP. These findings underscore the potential for improved patient outcomes with wider adoption of robotic systems in Australia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信