欧洲联盟材料回收和能源效率的环境和经济层面

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Gizem Uzuner , Andrew Adewale Alola , Sinan Erdogan
{"title":"欧洲联盟材料回收和能源效率的环境和经济层面","authors":"Gizem Uzuner ,&nbsp;Andrew Adewale Alola ,&nbsp;Sinan Erdogan","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The current use rate of recycled material in the European Union (EU), at 11.5 percent in 2022, arguably undermines the bloc's 2030 target of reaching twice the recycled material use rate between 2020 and 2030. Given the current scenario, this investigation attempts to corroborate whether material circularity improve environmental quality without compromising economic performance. Due to its ability to provide robust inferences, a two-step dynamic system generalized method of moments (GMM) was employed for the dataset spanning 2010 to 2022. Other indicators were also incorporated into the analysis through two distinct models. Foremost, the finding shows that material circularity and primary energy consumption mitigate per capita carbon emission while income level and energy efficiency show detrimental effect on environmental quality. For economic dimension, both material circularity and energy efficiency hamper income level but income level improves with increase in total primary energy consumption and urbanization. Importantly, although the use rate of recycled material improves environmental quality and hampers income level, the elasticities are small in magnitude. However, this observation provides important insight on the need to drive the economic dividend of material circularity as much as its environmental benefits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"503 ","pages":"Article 145381"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental and economic dimensions of material recycling and energy efficiency in the European Union\",\"authors\":\"Gizem Uzuner ,&nbsp;Andrew Adewale Alola ,&nbsp;Sinan Erdogan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The current use rate of recycled material in the European Union (EU), at 11.5 percent in 2022, arguably undermines the bloc's 2030 target of reaching twice the recycled material use rate between 2020 and 2030. Given the current scenario, this investigation attempts to corroborate whether material circularity improve environmental quality without compromising economic performance. Due to its ability to provide robust inferences, a two-step dynamic system generalized method of moments (GMM) was employed for the dataset spanning 2010 to 2022. Other indicators were also incorporated into the analysis through two distinct models. Foremost, the finding shows that material circularity and primary energy consumption mitigate per capita carbon emission while income level and energy efficiency show detrimental effect on environmental quality. For economic dimension, both material circularity and energy efficiency hamper income level but income level improves with increase in total primary energy consumption and urbanization. Importantly, although the use rate of recycled material improves environmental quality and hampers income level, the elasticities are small in magnitude. However, this observation provides important insight on the need to drive the economic dividend of material circularity as much as its environmental benefits.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"volume\":\"503 \",\"pages\":\"Article 145381\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652625007310\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652625007310","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧盟目前的再生材料使用率在2022年为11.5%,可以说破坏了欧盟2030年的目标,即在2020年至2030年之间将再生材料使用率提高一倍。鉴于目前的情况,本调查试图证实材料循环是否在不影响经济绩效的情况下改善环境质量。由于其提供鲁棒推断的能力,对2010年至2022年的数据集采用了两步动态系统广义矩量方法(GMM)。其他指标也通过两个不同的模型纳入分析。首先,研究结果表明,材料循环度和一次能源消耗降低了人均碳排放,而收入水平和能源效率则对环境质量产生不利影响。在经济维度上,材料循环度和能源效率都影响收入水平,但收入水平随着一次能源消费总量和城市化的增加而提高。重要的是,尽管回收材料的使用率提高了环境质量并阻碍了收入水平,但弹性的幅度很小。然而,这一观察结果为推动材料循环的经济红利和环境效益的必要性提供了重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Environmental and economic dimensions of material recycling and energy efficiency in the European Union
The current use rate of recycled material in the European Union (EU), at 11.5 percent in 2022, arguably undermines the bloc's 2030 target of reaching twice the recycled material use rate between 2020 and 2030. Given the current scenario, this investigation attempts to corroborate whether material circularity improve environmental quality without compromising economic performance. Due to its ability to provide robust inferences, a two-step dynamic system generalized method of moments (GMM) was employed for the dataset spanning 2010 to 2022. Other indicators were also incorporated into the analysis through two distinct models. Foremost, the finding shows that material circularity and primary energy consumption mitigate per capita carbon emission while income level and energy efficiency show detrimental effect on environmental quality. For economic dimension, both material circularity and energy efficiency hamper income level but income level improves with increase in total primary energy consumption and urbanization. Importantly, although the use rate of recycled material improves environmental quality and hampers income level, the elasticities are small in magnitude. However, this observation provides important insight on the need to drive the economic dividend of material circularity as much as its environmental benefits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信