诊断准确性在瑞典国家患者登记:审查包括诊断在门诊登记

IF 5.9 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Åsa H. Everhov, Thomas Frisell, Mehdi Osooli, Hannah L. Brooke, Hanne K. Carlsen, Karin Modig, Karl Mårild, Jonathan Lindström, Karin Sköldin, Mona Heurgren, Jonas F. Ludvigsson, Ola Olén
{"title":"诊断准确性在瑞典国家患者登记:审查包括诊断在门诊登记","authors":"Åsa H. Everhov, Thomas Frisell, Mehdi Osooli, Hannah L. Brooke, Hanne K. Carlsen, Karin Modig, Karl Mårild, Jonathan Lindström, Karin Sköldin, Mona Heurgren, Jonas F. Ludvigsson, Ola Olén","doi":"10.1007/s10654-025-01221-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>The Swedish National Patient Register (NPR) is an important source of data for epidemiological research. A review in 2010 described the validity of recorded diagnoses for inpatient care, but did not include specialised outpatient care.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Method</h3><p>Using systematic searches of medical literature databases (Embase, Medline), and reports from members of the Swedish Epidemiological Association, we aimed to identify all studies validating diagnoses and procedure codes in inpatient care since 2010 and all studies validating specialised outpatient care. In addition, we summarize findings from register validation work performed by the National Board of Health and Welfare.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The literature search and personal reports generated 3990 non-duplicate original studies, of which 89 were deemed relevant. Compared to data in patient charts (reference), the median positive predictive value (PPV) for diagnostic codes in the NPR was 84% (interquartile range 72–93%), but with clear differences between types of diagnoses. The median PPV for surgical procedures was 97% (86–99%). The median sensitivity of diagnoses and procedures compared to other registers and cohorts was 73% (45–80%). The completeness of the register has improved over time. Missingness originates mainly from underreporting of procedures performed by private healthcare providers, and for certain variables, e.g. medication codes.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>The NPR has good diagnostic accuracy for most diagnoses and very good for surgical procedures. The sensitivity is lower. Longitudinal comparisons of incidence or prevalence are affected by changes in completeness. Missingness is low, although it is higher among private healthcare providers and for specific variables such as drug administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":11907,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Epidemiology","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic accuracy in the Swedish national patient register: a review including diagnoses in the outpatient register\",\"authors\":\"Åsa H. Everhov, Thomas Frisell, Mehdi Osooli, Hannah L. Brooke, Hanne K. Carlsen, Karin Modig, Karl Mårild, Jonathan Lindström, Karin Sköldin, Mona Heurgren, Jonas F. Ludvigsson, Ola Olén\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10654-025-01221-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background</h3><p>The Swedish National Patient Register (NPR) is an important source of data for epidemiological research. A review in 2010 described the validity of recorded diagnoses for inpatient care, but did not include specialised outpatient care.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Method</h3><p>Using systematic searches of medical literature databases (Embase, Medline), and reports from members of the Swedish Epidemiological Association, we aimed to identify all studies validating diagnoses and procedure codes in inpatient care since 2010 and all studies validating specialised outpatient care. In addition, we summarize findings from register validation work performed by the National Board of Health and Welfare.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>The literature search and personal reports generated 3990 non-duplicate original studies, of which 89 were deemed relevant. Compared to data in patient charts (reference), the median positive predictive value (PPV) for diagnostic codes in the NPR was 84% (interquartile range 72–93%), but with clear differences between types of diagnoses. The median PPV for surgical procedures was 97% (86–99%). The median sensitivity of diagnoses and procedures compared to other registers and cohorts was 73% (45–80%). The completeness of the register has improved over time. Missingness originates mainly from underreporting of procedures performed by private healthcare providers, and for certain variables, e.g. medication codes.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>The NPR has good diagnostic accuracy for most diagnoses and very good for surgical procedures. The sensitivity is lower. Longitudinal comparisons of incidence or prevalence are affected by changes in completeness. Missingness is low, although it is higher among private healthcare providers and for specific variables such as drug administration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-025-01221-0\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-025-01221-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

瑞典国家患者登记(NPR)是流行病学研究的重要数据来源。2010年的一项综述描述了住院治疗记录诊断的有效性,但不包括专门的门诊治疗。方法通过系统检索医学文献数据库(Embase、Medline)和瑞典流行病学协会成员的报告,我们旨在确定自2010年以来所有验证住院治疗诊断和程序代码的研究,以及所有验证专科门诊治疗的研究。此外,我们总结了由国家卫生和福利委员会执行的登记验证工作的发现。结果文献检索和个人报告共产生3990项非重复的原始研究,其中89项被认为是相关的。与患者图表数据(参考)相比,NPR诊断代码的中位阳性预测值(PPV)为84%(四分位数间距为72-93%),但诊断类型之间存在明显差异。手术的中位PPV为97%(86-99%)。与其他登记和队列相比,诊断和手术的中位敏感性为73%(45-80%)。随着时间的推移,寄存器的完整性得到了改善。缺失主要源于少报私人医疗保健提供者执行的程序,以及对某些变量(例如药物代码)的少报。结论NPR对大多数诊断具有良好的准确性,对外科手术有很好的指导作用。灵敏度较低。发生率或患病率的纵向比较受完整性变化的影响。失踪率较低,尽管在私人医疗保健提供者和药物管理等特定变量中失踪率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic accuracy in the Swedish national patient register: a review including diagnoses in the outpatient register

Background

The Swedish National Patient Register (NPR) is an important source of data for epidemiological research. A review in 2010 described the validity of recorded diagnoses for inpatient care, but did not include specialised outpatient care.

Method

Using systematic searches of medical literature databases (Embase, Medline), and reports from members of the Swedish Epidemiological Association, we aimed to identify all studies validating diagnoses and procedure codes in inpatient care since 2010 and all studies validating specialised outpatient care. In addition, we summarize findings from register validation work performed by the National Board of Health and Welfare.

Results

The literature search and personal reports generated 3990 non-duplicate original studies, of which 89 were deemed relevant. Compared to data in patient charts (reference), the median positive predictive value (PPV) for diagnostic codes in the NPR was 84% (interquartile range 72–93%), but with clear differences between types of diagnoses. The median PPV for surgical procedures was 97% (86–99%). The median sensitivity of diagnoses and procedures compared to other registers and cohorts was 73% (45–80%). The completeness of the register has improved over time. Missingness originates mainly from underreporting of procedures performed by private healthcare providers, and for certain variables, e.g. medication codes.

Conclusion

The NPR has good diagnostic accuracy for most diagnoses and very good for surgical procedures. The sensitivity is lower. Longitudinal comparisons of incidence or prevalence are affected by changes in completeness. Missingness is low, although it is higher among private healthcare providers and for specific variables such as drug administration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Epidemiology
European Journal of Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
1.50%
发文量
109
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Epidemiology, established in 1985, is a peer-reviewed publication that provides a platform for discussions on epidemiology in its broadest sense. It covers various aspects of epidemiologic research and statistical methods. The journal facilitates communication between researchers, educators, and practitioners in epidemiology, including those in clinical and community medicine. Contributions from diverse fields such as public health, preventive medicine, clinical medicine, health economics, and computational biology and data science, in relation to health and disease, are encouraged. While accepting submissions from all over the world, the journal particularly emphasizes European topics relevant to epidemiology. The published articles consist of empirical research findings, developments in methodology, and opinion pieces.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信