Åsa H. Everhov, Thomas Frisell, Mehdi Osooli, Hannah L. Brooke, Hanne K. Carlsen, Karin Modig, Karl Mårild, Jonathan Lindström, Karin Sköldin, Mona Heurgren, Jonas F. Ludvigsson, Ola Olén
{"title":"诊断准确性在瑞典国家患者登记:审查包括诊断在门诊登记","authors":"Åsa H. Everhov, Thomas Frisell, Mehdi Osooli, Hannah L. Brooke, Hanne K. Carlsen, Karin Modig, Karl Mårild, Jonathan Lindström, Karin Sköldin, Mona Heurgren, Jonas F. Ludvigsson, Ola Olén","doi":"10.1007/s10654-025-01221-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>The Swedish National Patient Register (NPR) is an important source of data for epidemiological research. A review in 2010 described the validity of recorded diagnoses for inpatient care, but did not include specialised outpatient care.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Method</h3><p>Using systematic searches of medical literature databases (Embase, Medline), and reports from members of the Swedish Epidemiological Association, we aimed to identify all studies validating diagnoses and procedure codes in inpatient care since 2010 and all studies validating specialised outpatient care. In addition, we summarize findings from register validation work performed by the National Board of Health and Welfare.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The literature search and personal reports generated 3990 non-duplicate original studies, of which 89 were deemed relevant. Compared to data in patient charts (reference), the median positive predictive value (PPV) for diagnostic codes in the NPR was 84% (interquartile range 72–93%), but with clear differences between types of diagnoses. The median PPV for surgical procedures was 97% (86–99%). The median sensitivity of diagnoses and procedures compared to other registers and cohorts was 73% (45–80%). The completeness of the register has improved over time. Missingness originates mainly from underreporting of procedures performed by private healthcare providers, and for certain variables, e.g. medication codes.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>The NPR has good diagnostic accuracy for most diagnoses and very good for surgical procedures. The sensitivity is lower. Longitudinal comparisons of incidence or prevalence are affected by changes in completeness. Missingness is low, although it is higher among private healthcare providers and for specific variables such as drug administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":11907,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Epidemiology","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic accuracy in the Swedish national patient register: a review including diagnoses in the outpatient register\",\"authors\":\"Åsa H. Everhov, Thomas Frisell, Mehdi Osooli, Hannah L. Brooke, Hanne K. Carlsen, Karin Modig, Karl Mårild, Jonathan Lindström, Karin Sköldin, Mona Heurgren, Jonas F. Ludvigsson, Ola Olén\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10654-025-01221-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background</h3><p>The Swedish National Patient Register (NPR) is an important source of data for epidemiological research. A review in 2010 described the validity of recorded diagnoses for inpatient care, but did not include specialised outpatient care.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Method</h3><p>Using systematic searches of medical literature databases (Embase, Medline), and reports from members of the Swedish Epidemiological Association, we aimed to identify all studies validating diagnoses and procedure codes in inpatient care since 2010 and all studies validating specialised outpatient care. In addition, we summarize findings from register validation work performed by the National Board of Health and Welfare.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>The literature search and personal reports generated 3990 non-duplicate original studies, of which 89 were deemed relevant. Compared to data in patient charts (reference), the median positive predictive value (PPV) for diagnostic codes in the NPR was 84% (interquartile range 72–93%), but with clear differences between types of diagnoses. The median PPV for surgical procedures was 97% (86–99%). The median sensitivity of diagnoses and procedures compared to other registers and cohorts was 73% (45–80%). The completeness of the register has improved over time. Missingness originates mainly from underreporting of procedures performed by private healthcare providers, and for certain variables, e.g. medication codes.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>The NPR has good diagnostic accuracy for most diagnoses and very good for surgical procedures. The sensitivity is lower. Longitudinal comparisons of incidence or prevalence are affected by changes in completeness. Missingness is low, although it is higher among private healthcare providers and for specific variables such as drug administration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-025-01221-0\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-025-01221-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnostic accuracy in the Swedish national patient register: a review including diagnoses in the outpatient register
Background
The Swedish National Patient Register (NPR) is an important source of data for epidemiological research. A review in 2010 described the validity of recorded diagnoses for inpatient care, but did not include specialised outpatient care.
Method
Using systematic searches of medical literature databases (Embase, Medline), and reports from members of the Swedish Epidemiological Association, we aimed to identify all studies validating diagnoses and procedure codes in inpatient care since 2010 and all studies validating specialised outpatient care. In addition, we summarize findings from register validation work performed by the National Board of Health and Welfare.
Results
The literature search and personal reports generated 3990 non-duplicate original studies, of which 89 were deemed relevant. Compared to data in patient charts (reference), the median positive predictive value (PPV) for diagnostic codes in the NPR was 84% (interquartile range 72–93%), but with clear differences between types of diagnoses. The median PPV for surgical procedures was 97% (86–99%). The median sensitivity of diagnoses and procedures compared to other registers and cohorts was 73% (45–80%). The completeness of the register has improved over time. Missingness originates mainly from underreporting of procedures performed by private healthcare providers, and for certain variables, e.g. medication codes.
Conclusion
The NPR has good diagnostic accuracy for most diagnoses and very good for surgical procedures. The sensitivity is lower. Longitudinal comparisons of incidence or prevalence are affected by changes in completeness. Missingness is low, although it is higher among private healthcare providers and for specific variables such as drug administration.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Epidemiology, established in 1985, is a peer-reviewed publication that provides a platform for discussions on epidemiology in its broadest sense. It covers various aspects of epidemiologic research and statistical methods. The journal facilitates communication between researchers, educators, and practitioners in epidemiology, including those in clinical and community medicine. Contributions from diverse fields such as public health, preventive medicine, clinical medicine, health economics, and computational biology and data science, in relation to health and disease, are encouraged. While accepting submissions from all over the world, the journal particularly emphasizes European topics relevant to epidemiology. The published articles consist of empirical research findings, developments in methodology, and opinion pieces.