安慰剂的正义:临床试验和日常实践中的安慰剂效应。

Nebojsa Nick Knezevic, Aleksandar Sic, Samantha Worobey, Emilija Knezevic
{"title":"安慰剂的正义:临床试验和日常实践中的安慰剂效应。","authors":"Nebojsa Nick Knezevic, Aleksandar Sic, Samantha Worobey, Emilija Knezevic","doi":"10.3390/medicines12010005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The placebo effect has been widely documented across various medical conditions, demonstrating its ability to influence both subjective and objective outcomes. Placebo responses can significantly improve symptoms in these different conditions, such as pain, Parkinson's disease, depression, anxiety, and addiction. Psychological mechanisms, particularly the power of patient expectations, appear to play a central role, with neurobiological evidence supporting the activation of dopamine, endogenous opioids, and endocannabinoids in response to placebo interventions. Studies have demonstrated that placebo injections and more complex procedures, including sham surgeries, can produce therapeutic effects comparable to real treatments, particularly in pain management and neurological disorders. Moreover, placebo responses could be amplified when patients are aware of receiving treatment, as shown by research on open-label placebos and open versus hidden medical treatments. The effectiveness of 0.9% sodium chloride solution as a placebo in clinical trials is debated, with some studies indicating its potential to induce clinical improvements, though it may not be an ideal control in inflammatory pain conditions. Advances in neuroimaging have revealed that placebo treatments trigger tangible biological processes in the brain and body and are supported by psychological and physiological mechanisms that interact, suggesting real biological processes are involved in the observed effects. Overall, the growing understanding of placebo mechanisms suggests that incorporating placebo-based strategies, with patient awareness and appropriate ethical considerations, may offer significant potential for improving patient outcomes, particularly in chronic pain, mental health, and neurological conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":74162,"journal":{"name":"Medicines (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11944128/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Justice for Placebo: Placebo Effect in Clinical Trials and Everyday Practice.\",\"authors\":\"Nebojsa Nick Knezevic, Aleksandar Sic, Samantha Worobey, Emilija Knezevic\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/medicines12010005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The placebo effect has been widely documented across various medical conditions, demonstrating its ability to influence both subjective and objective outcomes. Placebo responses can significantly improve symptoms in these different conditions, such as pain, Parkinson's disease, depression, anxiety, and addiction. Psychological mechanisms, particularly the power of patient expectations, appear to play a central role, with neurobiological evidence supporting the activation of dopamine, endogenous opioids, and endocannabinoids in response to placebo interventions. Studies have demonstrated that placebo injections and more complex procedures, including sham surgeries, can produce therapeutic effects comparable to real treatments, particularly in pain management and neurological disorders. Moreover, placebo responses could be amplified when patients are aware of receiving treatment, as shown by research on open-label placebos and open versus hidden medical treatments. The effectiveness of 0.9% sodium chloride solution as a placebo in clinical trials is debated, with some studies indicating its potential to induce clinical improvements, though it may not be an ideal control in inflammatory pain conditions. Advances in neuroimaging have revealed that placebo treatments trigger tangible biological processes in the brain and body and are supported by psychological and physiological mechanisms that interact, suggesting real biological processes are involved in the observed effects. Overall, the growing understanding of placebo mechanisms suggests that incorporating placebo-based strategies, with patient awareness and appropriate ethical considerations, may offer significant potential for improving patient outcomes, particularly in chronic pain, mental health, and neurological conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicines (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11944128/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicines (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines12010005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicines (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines12010005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

安慰剂效应在各种医疗条件下都有广泛的记录,证明了它影响主观和客观结果的能力。安慰剂反应可以显著改善这些不同疾病的症状,如疼痛、帕金森病、抑郁、焦虑和成瘾。心理机制,特别是患者期望的力量,似乎起着核心作用,神经生物学证据支持多巴胺、内源性阿片类药物和内源性大麻素在安慰剂干预下的激活。研究表明,注射安慰剂和更复杂的程序,包括假手术,可以产生与真正的治疗相当的治疗效果,特别是在疼痛管理和神经疾病方面。此外,当患者意识到自己正在接受治疗时,安慰剂的反应可能会被放大,就像对开放标签安慰剂和公开与隐蔽医学治疗的研究所显示的那样。在临床试验中,0.9%氯化钠溶液作为安慰剂的有效性存在争议,一些研究表明它有可能引起临床改善,尽管它可能不是炎症性疼痛条件下的理想控制。神经影像学的进展表明,安慰剂治疗触发了大脑和身体中有形的生物过程,并得到相互作用的心理和生理机制的支持,表明观察到的效果涉及真正的生物过程。总的来说,对安慰剂机制的日益了解表明,将基于安慰剂的策略与患者的意识和适当的伦理考虑结合起来,可能会为改善患者的预后提供巨大的潜力,特别是在慢性疼痛、心理健康和神经系统疾病方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Justice for Placebo: Placebo Effect in Clinical Trials and Everyday Practice.

The placebo effect has been widely documented across various medical conditions, demonstrating its ability to influence both subjective and objective outcomes. Placebo responses can significantly improve symptoms in these different conditions, such as pain, Parkinson's disease, depression, anxiety, and addiction. Psychological mechanisms, particularly the power of patient expectations, appear to play a central role, with neurobiological evidence supporting the activation of dopamine, endogenous opioids, and endocannabinoids in response to placebo interventions. Studies have demonstrated that placebo injections and more complex procedures, including sham surgeries, can produce therapeutic effects comparable to real treatments, particularly in pain management and neurological disorders. Moreover, placebo responses could be amplified when patients are aware of receiving treatment, as shown by research on open-label placebos and open versus hidden medical treatments. The effectiveness of 0.9% sodium chloride solution as a placebo in clinical trials is debated, with some studies indicating its potential to induce clinical improvements, though it may not be an ideal control in inflammatory pain conditions. Advances in neuroimaging have revealed that placebo treatments trigger tangible biological processes in the brain and body and are supported by psychological and physiological mechanisms that interact, suggesting real biological processes are involved in the observed effects. Overall, the growing understanding of placebo mechanisms suggests that incorporating placebo-based strategies, with patient awareness and appropriate ethical considerations, may offer significant potential for improving patient outcomes, particularly in chronic pain, mental health, and neurological conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信