使用基于微信的认知负荷训练平台减少护士报告不良事件的障碍:一项开放标签、随机对照试验

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-03-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S482233
Xiaoying Zhao, Lihua Zhao, Guangyao Li, Wenfeng Yang, Huili Wang, Yanmeng Yang
{"title":"使用基于微信的认知负荷训练平台减少护士报告不良事件的障碍:一项开放标签、随机对照试验","authors":"Xiaoying Zhao, Lihua Zhao, Guangyao Li, Wenfeng Yang, Huili Wang, Yanmeng Yang","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S482233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effects of a cognitive load theory (CLT)-based WeChat training platform on reducing the barriers to reporting adverse events among clinical nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 400 clinical nurses from a tertiary general hospital were randomized into experimental and control groups (200 each). The experimental group used the CLT-based WeChat training platform, whereas the control group received conventional training for nursing adverse events. Both interventions lasted 12 weeks. Barriers to reporting, reporting awareness, intention, and habit scores were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the dropouts, 197 experimental and 196 control participants completed the study. In the experimental group, the total scores for barriers to reporting adverse events and in the dimensions of punitive culture, reporting process, and reporting significance scores were 93.87 ± 6.85, 48.88 ± 4.68, 21.53 ± 4.15, and 23.40 ± 2.11, respectively, whereas the control group corresponding scores were 72.07 ± 6.67, 34.20 ± 6.02, 20.06 ± 3.25, and 17.36 ± 2.92, respectively. The experimental group demonstrated significantly higher scores and reporting significance (P all < 0.01). Additionally, the experimental group had significantly higher scores for safety event reporting awareness, intention, and habits than those in the control group (P < 0.01). When responding to nursing adverse events of various severity, the only exception to statistically significant differences between the groups was in \"reporting to the head nurse\" for medium-severity incidents (P = 0.302). However, the experimental group demonstrated significantly higher rates of \"submitting an adverse event report\", \"reporting to the head nurse\", and \"discussing with colleagues\" than those in the control group regardless of the severity of the adverse event (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirmed that the CLT-based WeChat training platform model can effectively reduce the level of barriers to adverse event reporting by nurses, enhance nurses' adverse event reporting awareness, intention, and promote improvement in nurses' adverse event reporting behaviors, thereby improving the quality of nursing care and patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"947-961"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11934873/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reducing Nurses' Barriers to Reporting Adverse Events Using a WeChat-Based Cognitive Load Training Platform: An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoying Zhao, Lihua Zhao, Guangyao Li, Wenfeng Yang, Huili Wang, Yanmeng Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RMHP.S482233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effects of a cognitive load theory (CLT)-based WeChat training platform on reducing the barriers to reporting adverse events among clinical nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 400 clinical nurses from a tertiary general hospital were randomized into experimental and control groups (200 each). The experimental group used the CLT-based WeChat training platform, whereas the control group received conventional training for nursing adverse events. Both interventions lasted 12 weeks. Barriers to reporting, reporting awareness, intention, and habit scores were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the dropouts, 197 experimental and 196 control participants completed the study. In the experimental group, the total scores for barriers to reporting adverse events and in the dimensions of punitive culture, reporting process, and reporting significance scores were 93.87 ± 6.85, 48.88 ± 4.68, 21.53 ± 4.15, and 23.40 ± 2.11, respectively, whereas the control group corresponding scores were 72.07 ± 6.67, 34.20 ± 6.02, 20.06 ± 3.25, and 17.36 ± 2.92, respectively. The experimental group demonstrated significantly higher scores and reporting significance (P all < 0.01). Additionally, the experimental group had significantly higher scores for safety event reporting awareness, intention, and habits than those in the control group (P < 0.01). When responding to nursing adverse events of various severity, the only exception to statistically significant differences between the groups was in \\\"reporting to the head nurse\\\" for medium-severity incidents (P = 0.302). However, the experimental group demonstrated significantly higher rates of \\\"submitting an adverse event report\\\", \\\"reporting to the head nurse\\\", and \\\"discussing with colleagues\\\" than those in the control group regardless of the severity of the adverse event (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirmed that the CLT-based WeChat training platform model can effectively reduce the level of barriers to adverse event reporting by nurses, enhance nurses' adverse event reporting awareness, intention, and promote improvement in nurses' adverse event reporting behaviors, thereby improving the quality of nursing care and patient safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"947-961\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11934873/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S482233\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S482233","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨基于认知负荷理论(CLT)的微信培训平台对降低临床护士不良事件报告障碍的效果。方法:选取某三级综合医院临床护士400名,随机分为实验组和对照组各200名。实验组采用基于clt的微信培训平台,对照组采用常规护理不良事件培训。两种干预均持续12周。报告障碍、报告意识、意图和习惯得分在两组之间进行比较。结果:退出后,197名实验参与者和196名对照参与者完成了研究。实验组不良事件报告障碍和惩罚性培养、报告过程、报告显著性维度的总分分别为93.87±6.85、48.88±4.68、21.53±4.15、23.40±2.11,对照组分别为72.07±6.67、34.20±6.02、20.06±3.25、17.36±2.92。试验组得分显著高于对照组(P均< 0.01)。此外,实验组的安全事件报告意识、意图和习惯得分显著高于对照组(P < 0.01)。在应对不同严重程度的护理不良事件时,组间唯一有统计学显著差异的例外是“向护士长报告”中度严重事件(P = 0.302)。但无论不良事件的严重程度如何,实验组“提交不良事件报告”、“向护士长报告”、“与同事讨论”的比例均显著高于对照组(P < 0.01)。结论:本研究证实基于clt的微信培训平台模式可以有效降低护士不良事件报告的障碍水平,增强护士不良事件报告的意识和意愿,促进护士不良事件报告行为的改善,从而提高护理质量和患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reducing Nurses' Barriers to Reporting Adverse Events Using a WeChat-Based Cognitive Load Training Platform: An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective: To investigate the effects of a cognitive load theory (CLT)-based WeChat training platform on reducing the barriers to reporting adverse events among clinical nurses.

Methods: In total, 400 clinical nurses from a tertiary general hospital were randomized into experimental and control groups (200 each). The experimental group used the CLT-based WeChat training platform, whereas the control group received conventional training for nursing adverse events. Both interventions lasted 12 weeks. Barriers to reporting, reporting awareness, intention, and habit scores were compared between the groups.

Results: After the dropouts, 197 experimental and 196 control participants completed the study. In the experimental group, the total scores for barriers to reporting adverse events and in the dimensions of punitive culture, reporting process, and reporting significance scores were 93.87 ± 6.85, 48.88 ± 4.68, 21.53 ± 4.15, and 23.40 ± 2.11, respectively, whereas the control group corresponding scores were 72.07 ± 6.67, 34.20 ± 6.02, 20.06 ± 3.25, and 17.36 ± 2.92, respectively. The experimental group demonstrated significantly higher scores and reporting significance (P all < 0.01). Additionally, the experimental group had significantly higher scores for safety event reporting awareness, intention, and habits than those in the control group (P < 0.01). When responding to nursing adverse events of various severity, the only exception to statistically significant differences between the groups was in "reporting to the head nurse" for medium-severity incidents (P = 0.302). However, the experimental group demonstrated significantly higher rates of "submitting an adverse event report", "reporting to the head nurse", and "discussing with colleagues" than those in the control group regardless of the severity of the adverse event (P < 0.01).

Conclusion: This study confirmed that the CLT-based WeChat training platform model can effectively reduce the level of barriers to adverse event reporting by nurses, enhance nurses' adverse event reporting awareness, intention, and promote improvement in nurses' adverse event reporting behaviors, thereby improving the quality of nursing care and patient safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信