Melina Forooraghi, Annemarie Hultberg, Ingibjörg H Jonsdottir, Maral Babapour Chafi
{"title":"探索基于活动的灵活办公室中设计原则和工作单位需求之间的一致性:案例研究。","authors":"Melina Forooraghi, Annemarie Hultberg, Ingibjörg H Jonsdottir, Maral Babapour Chafi","doi":"10.1080/00140139.2025.2475350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Activity-based flexible offices (AFOs) offer employees a variety of workspaces based on their activities and needs. This study examines employees' perceptions of the workplace design across five work units in a public service organisation in Sweden, before and after relocation to AFOs. Data collection involved pre- and post-occupancy surveys (T1 = 345, T2 = 388) and interviews (T2 = 75). Explorative and descriptive data analysis was applied. The findings reveal a negative trend in perceptions of workplace design. The uniform application of design principles posed challenges. First, predominantly open zones did not support units with high concentration or confidential tasks. Second, limitations for personalisation did not fit units with creative tasks. Third, clean-desk policy introduced challenges in maintaining team cohesion and colocation did not improve within or between unit cooperations. The study suggests a balanced approach, combining customised and uniform principles to better align office design with diverse needs of different units within organisations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50503,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring alignments between design principles and work unit needs in activity-based flexible offices: a case study.\",\"authors\":\"Melina Forooraghi, Annemarie Hultberg, Ingibjörg H Jonsdottir, Maral Babapour Chafi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00140139.2025.2475350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Activity-based flexible offices (AFOs) offer employees a variety of workspaces based on their activities and needs. This study examines employees' perceptions of the workplace design across five work units in a public service organisation in Sweden, before and after relocation to AFOs. Data collection involved pre- and post-occupancy surveys (T1 = 345, T2 = 388) and interviews (T2 = 75). Explorative and descriptive data analysis was applied. The findings reveal a negative trend in perceptions of workplace design. The uniform application of design principles posed challenges. First, predominantly open zones did not support units with high concentration or confidential tasks. Second, limitations for personalisation did not fit units with creative tasks. Third, clean-desk policy introduced challenges in maintaining team cohesion and colocation did not improve within or between unit cooperations. The study suggests a balanced approach, combining customised and uniform principles to better align office design with diverse needs of different units within organisations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2475350\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2475350","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring alignments between design principles and work unit needs in activity-based flexible offices: a case study.
Activity-based flexible offices (AFOs) offer employees a variety of workspaces based on their activities and needs. This study examines employees' perceptions of the workplace design across five work units in a public service organisation in Sweden, before and after relocation to AFOs. Data collection involved pre- and post-occupancy surveys (T1 = 345, T2 = 388) and interviews (T2 = 75). Explorative and descriptive data analysis was applied. The findings reveal a negative trend in perceptions of workplace design. The uniform application of design principles posed challenges. First, predominantly open zones did not support units with high concentration or confidential tasks. Second, limitations for personalisation did not fit units with creative tasks. Third, clean-desk policy introduced challenges in maintaining team cohesion and colocation did not improve within or between unit cooperations. The study suggests a balanced approach, combining customised and uniform principles to better align office design with diverse needs of different units within organisations.
期刊介绍:
Ergonomics, also known as human factors, is the scientific discipline that seeks to understand and improve human interactions with products, equipment, environments and systems. Drawing upon human biology, psychology, engineering and design, Ergonomics aims to develop and apply knowledge and techniques to optimise system performance, whilst protecting the health, safety and well-being of individuals involved. The attention of ergonomics extends across work, leisure and other aspects of our daily lives.
The journal Ergonomics is an international refereed publication, with a 60 year tradition of disseminating high quality research. Original submissions, both theoretical and applied, are invited from across the subject, including physical, cognitive, organisational and environmental ergonomics. Papers reporting the findings of research from cognate disciplines are also welcome, where these contribute to understanding equipment, tasks, jobs, systems and environments and the corresponding needs, abilities and limitations of people.
All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees.