Amy T Fulton, Arpita Maniar, Alicia Provenzano, Tariq A Firosvi, Julianne Rogers, Bridget Archambault, Beiyu Liu, Shein-Chung Chow, Daniel B Landi, Miguel A Materin, Erik F Hauck
{"title":"视网膜母细胞瘤儿童动脉内化疗(IAC)单药与多药治疗的比较。","authors":"Amy T Fulton, Arpita Maniar, Alicia Provenzano, Tariq A Firosvi, Julianne Rogers, Bridget Archambault, Beiyu Liu, Shein-Chung Chow, Daniel B Landi, Miguel A Materin, Erik F Hauck","doi":"10.1177/15910199251324028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveIntra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) is a well-established treatment for retinoblastoma (RB). However, there are no standardized recommendations regarding the choice of drugs. This study compares the outcomes of single- versus multi-drug therapy.MethodsClinical data was reviewed for RB children treated with IAC at our institution between 2018 and 2023. Patients were divided into single- and multi-drug treatment groups. Clinical parameters included total number of IAC treatments, treatment-related adverse events, duration of additional post-IAC treatments, residual disease, recurrence, and the need for enucleation.ObservationsA total of 101 IAC treatments were included. Multi-drug therapy showed improved outcomes as compared to single-drug therapy, particularly in RB group B and C patients. After multi-drug IAC, less secondary treatment time was required compared to single-drug treatment (2.1 months versus 4.6 months; p = 0.019). Group B and C patients required a median of 8.5 fewer months of secondary treatment after multi- vs. single-drug IAC. Patients treated with multi-drug IAC had an overall lower rate of residual disease or recurrence compared to single-drug IAC patients (26.3% vs. 35.7% recurrence; 52.6% vs. 71.4% residual). In group B and C patients, the difference was more pronounced (12.5% vs. 40% recurrence; 37.5% vs. 60% residual). The overall success rate in preventing enucleation was 90.9%.ConclusionsIAC treatment for RB is safe and effective. IAC prevented enucleation in >90% of our patients. Multi-drug IAC patients required less secondary treatment post-IAC, particularly group B and C patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251324028"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948239/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of single- versus multi-drug treatment for intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) in children with retinoblastoma.\",\"authors\":\"Amy T Fulton, Arpita Maniar, Alicia Provenzano, Tariq A Firosvi, Julianne Rogers, Bridget Archambault, Beiyu Liu, Shein-Chung Chow, Daniel B Landi, Miguel A Materin, Erik F Hauck\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15910199251324028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveIntra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) is a well-established treatment for retinoblastoma (RB). However, there are no standardized recommendations regarding the choice of drugs. This study compares the outcomes of single- versus multi-drug therapy.MethodsClinical data was reviewed for RB children treated with IAC at our institution between 2018 and 2023. Patients were divided into single- and multi-drug treatment groups. Clinical parameters included total number of IAC treatments, treatment-related adverse events, duration of additional post-IAC treatments, residual disease, recurrence, and the need for enucleation.ObservationsA total of 101 IAC treatments were included. Multi-drug therapy showed improved outcomes as compared to single-drug therapy, particularly in RB group B and C patients. After multi-drug IAC, less secondary treatment time was required compared to single-drug treatment (2.1 months versus 4.6 months; p = 0.019). Group B and C patients required a median of 8.5 fewer months of secondary treatment after multi- vs. single-drug IAC. Patients treated with multi-drug IAC had an overall lower rate of residual disease or recurrence compared to single-drug IAC patients (26.3% vs. 35.7% recurrence; 52.6% vs. 71.4% residual). In group B and C patients, the difference was more pronounced (12.5% vs. 40% recurrence; 37.5% vs. 60% residual). The overall success rate in preventing enucleation was 90.9%.ConclusionsIAC treatment for RB is safe and effective. IAC prevented enucleation in >90% of our patients. Multi-drug IAC patients required less secondary treatment post-IAC, particularly group B and C patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15910199251324028\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948239/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251324028\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251324028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的动脉内化疗(IAC)是治疗视网膜母细胞瘤(RB)的有效方法。然而,对于药物的选择并没有标准化的建议。本研究比较了单药治疗和多药治疗的结果。方法回顾2018年至2023年我院合并IAC的RB患儿的临床资料。将患者分为单药组和多药组。临床参数包括IAC治疗的总次数、治疗相关不良事件、IAC后额外治疗的持续时间、残留疾病、复发和是否需要去核。观察共纳入101例IAC治疗。与单药治疗相比,多药治疗显示出更好的结果,特别是RB组B和C患者。与单药治疗相比,多药IAC治疗所需的二次治疗时间更短(2.1个月对4.6个月;p = 0.019)。B组和C组患者在多药与单药IAC后需要的二次治疗中位数少8.5个月。与单药IAC患者相比,多药IAC患者的总体残留病或复发率较低(26.3% vs 35.7%复发率;52.6% vs.残差71.4%)。在B组和C组患者中,差异更为明显(12.5% vs 40%复发率;37.5% vs.剩余60%)。预防眼球摘除术总成功率为90.9%。结论siac治疗RB安全有效。在我们90%的患者中,IAC阻止了眼球摘除术。多药IAC患者,尤其是B组和C组患者,在IAC后需要的二次治疗较少。
Comparison of single- versus multi-drug treatment for intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) in children with retinoblastoma.
ObjectiveIntra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) is a well-established treatment for retinoblastoma (RB). However, there are no standardized recommendations regarding the choice of drugs. This study compares the outcomes of single- versus multi-drug therapy.MethodsClinical data was reviewed for RB children treated with IAC at our institution between 2018 and 2023. Patients were divided into single- and multi-drug treatment groups. Clinical parameters included total number of IAC treatments, treatment-related adverse events, duration of additional post-IAC treatments, residual disease, recurrence, and the need for enucleation.ObservationsA total of 101 IAC treatments were included. Multi-drug therapy showed improved outcomes as compared to single-drug therapy, particularly in RB group B and C patients. After multi-drug IAC, less secondary treatment time was required compared to single-drug treatment (2.1 months versus 4.6 months; p = 0.019). Group B and C patients required a median of 8.5 fewer months of secondary treatment after multi- vs. single-drug IAC. Patients treated with multi-drug IAC had an overall lower rate of residual disease or recurrence compared to single-drug IAC patients (26.3% vs. 35.7% recurrence; 52.6% vs. 71.4% residual). In group B and C patients, the difference was more pronounced (12.5% vs. 40% recurrence; 37.5% vs. 60% residual). The overall success rate in preventing enucleation was 90.9%.ConclusionsIAC treatment for RB is safe and effective. IAC prevented enucleation in >90% of our patients. Multi-drug IAC patients required less secondary treatment post-IAC, particularly group B and C patients.
期刊介绍:
Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...