视网膜母细胞瘤儿童动脉内化疗(IAC)单药与多药治疗的比较。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Amy T Fulton, Arpita Maniar, Alicia Provenzano, Tariq A Firosvi, Julianne Rogers, Bridget Archambault, Beiyu Liu, Shein-Chung Chow, Daniel B Landi, Miguel A Materin, Erik F Hauck
{"title":"视网膜母细胞瘤儿童动脉内化疗(IAC)单药与多药治疗的比较。","authors":"Amy T Fulton, Arpita Maniar, Alicia Provenzano, Tariq A Firosvi, Julianne Rogers, Bridget Archambault, Beiyu Liu, Shein-Chung Chow, Daniel B Landi, Miguel A Materin, Erik F Hauck","doi":"10.1177/15910199251324028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveIntra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) is a well-established treatment for retinoblastoma (RB). However, there are no standardized recommendations regarding the choice of drugs. This study compares the outcomes of single- versus multi-drug therapy.MethodsClinical data was reviewed for RB children treated with IAC at our institution between 2018 and 2023. Patients were divided into single- and multi-drug treatment groups. Clinical parameters included total number of IAC treatments, treatment-related adverse events, duration of additional post-IAC treatments, residual disease, recurrence, and the need for enucleation.ObservationsA total of 101 IAC treatments were included. Multi-drug therapy showed improved outcomes as compared to single-drug therapy, particularly in RB group B and C patients. After multi-drug IAC, less secondary treatment time was required compared to single-drug treatment (2.1 months versus 4.6 months; p = 0.019). Group B and C patients required a median of 8.5 fewer months of secondary treatment after multi- vs. single-drug IAC. Patients treated with multi-drug IAC had an overall lower rate of residual disease or recurrence compared to single-drug IAC patients (26.3% vs. 35.7% recurrence; 52.6% vs. 71.4% residual). In group B and C patients, the difference was more pronounced (12.5% vs. 40% recurrence; 37.5% vs. 60% residual). The overall success rate in preventing enucleation was 90.9%.ConclusionsIAC treatment for RB is safe and effective. IAC prevented enucleation in >90% of our patients. Multi-drug IAC patients required less secondary treatment post-IAC, particularly group B and C patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251324028"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948239/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of single- versus multi-drug treatment for intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) in children with retinoblastoma.\",\"authors\":\"Amy T Fulton, Arpita Maniar, Alicia Provenzano, Tariq A Firosvi, Julianne Rogers, Bridget Archambault, Beiyu Liu, Shein-Chung Chow, Daniel B Landi, Miguel A Materin, Erik F Hauck\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15910199251324028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveIntra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) is a well-established treatment for retinoblastoma (RB). However, there are no standardized recommendations regarding the choice of drugs. This study compares the outcomes of single- versus multi-drug therapy.MethodsClinical data was reviewed for RB children treated with IAC at our institution between 2018 and 2023. Patients were divided into single- and multi-drug treatment groups. Clinical parameters included total number of IAC treatments, treatment-related adverse events, duration of additional post-IAC treatments, residual disease, recurrence, and the need for enucleation.ObservationsA total of 101 IAC treatments were included. Multi-drug therapy showed improved outcomes as compared to single-drug therapy, particularly in RB group B and C patients. After multi-drug IAC, less secondary treatment time was required compared to single-drug treatment (2.1 months versus 4.6 months; p = 0.019). Group B and C patients required a median of 8.5 fewer months of secondary treatment after multi- vs. single-drug IAC. Patients treated with multi-drug IAC had an overall lower rate of residual disease or recurrence compared to single-drug IAC patients (26.3% vs. 35.7% recurrence; 52.6% vs. 71.4% residual). In group B and C patients, the difference was more pronounced (12.5% vs. 40% recurrence; 37.5% vs. 60% residual). The overall success rate in preventing enucleation was 90.9%.ConclusionsIAC treatment for RB is safe and effective. IAC prevented enucleation in >90% of our patients. Multi-drug IAC patients required less secondary treatment post-IAC, particularly group B and C patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15910199251324028\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948239/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251324028\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251324028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的动脉内化疗(IAC)是治疗视网膜母细胞瘤(RB)的有效方法。然而,对于药物的选择并没有标准化的建议。本研究比较了单药治疗和多药治疗的结果。方法回顾2018年至2023年我院合并IAC的RB患儿的临床资料。将患者分为单药组和多药组。临床参数包括IAC治疗的总次数、治疗相关不良事件、IAC后额外治疗的持续时间、残留疾病、复发和是否需要去核。观察共纳入101例IAC治疗。与单药治疗相比,多药治疗显示出更好的结果,特别是RB组B和C患者。与单药治疗相比,多药IAC治疗所需的二次治疗时间更短(2.1个月对4.6个月;p = 0.019)。B组和C组患者在多药与单药IAC后需要的二次治疗中位数少8.5个月。与单药IAC患者相比,多药IAC患者的总体残留病或复发率较低(26.3% vs 35.7%复发率;52.6% vs.残差71.4%)。在B组和C组患者中,差异更为明显(12.5% vs 40%复发率;37.5% vs.剩余60%)。预防眼球摘除术总成功率为90.9%。结论siac治疗RB安全有效。在我们90%的患者中,IAC阻止了眼球摘除术。多药IAC患者,尤其是B组和C组患者,在IAC后需要的二次治疗较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of single- versus multi-drug treatment for intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) in children with retinoblastoma.

ObjectiveIntra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) is a well-established treatment for retinoblastoma (RB). However, there are no standardized recommendations regarding the choice of drugs. This study compares the outcomes of single- versus multi-drug therapy.MethodsClinical data was reviewed for RB children treated with IAC at our institution between 2018 and 2023. Patients were divided into single- and multi-drug treatment groups. Clinical parameters included total number of IAC treatments, treatment-related adverse events, duration of additional post-IAC treatments, residual disease, recurrence, and the need for enucleation.ObservationsA total of 101 IAC treatments were included. Multi-drug therapy showed improved outcomes as compared to single-drug therapy, particularly in RB group B and C patients. After multi-drug IAC, less secondary treatment time was required compared to single-drug treatment (2.1 months versus 4.6 months; p = 0.019). Group B and C patients required a median of 8.5 fewer months of secondary treatment after multi- vs. single-drug IAC. Patients treated with multi-drug IAC had an overall lower rate of residual disease or recurrence compared to single-drug IAC patients (26.3% vs. 35.7% recurrence; 52.6% vs. 71.4% residual). In group B and C patients, the difference was more pronounced (12.5% vs. 40% recurrence; 37.5% vs. 60% residual). The overall success rate in preventing enucleation was 90.9%.ConclusionsIAC treatment for RB is safe and effective. IAC prevented enucleation in >90% of our patients. Multi-drug IAC patients required less secondary treatment post-IAC, particularly group B and C patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interventional Neuroradiology
Interventional Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信