多种长期疾病患者出院后用药清单差异。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Malin Olsen Syversen, Mikas Glatkauskas, Sandra Johanne Sedeniussen, Monica Hauge, Steffi Benny, Kristine Horgen, Marianne Lea, Rita Romskaug, Anne Mette Njaastad, Torunn Wibe, Karin Svensberg, Liv Mathiesen
{"title":"多种长期疾病患者出院后用药清单差异。","authors":"Malin Olsen Syversen, Mikas Glatkauskas, Sandra Johanne Sedeniussen, Monica Hauge, Steffi Benny, Kristine Horgen, Marianne Lea, Rita Romskaug, Anne Mette Njaastad, Torunn Wibe, Karin Svensberg, Liv Mathiesen","doi":"10.1016/j.sapharm.2025.03.062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inadequate information flow in the transition from hospital to home poses a challenge to medication safety, especially for patients with multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the frequency, categories, underlying reasons, and potential clinical relevance of medication discrepancies (MDs) by comparing medication lists in hospital discharge summaries with actual medication use after discharge in patients with MLTCs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Home-dwelling adult patients with MLTCs, using minimum four medications were included near the time of their planned discharge, from one internal medicine and two geriatric wards in Oslo, to this cross-sectional observational study. Medication reconciliation was performed 1-2 weeks post-discharge. Discrepancies between the medication list in the discharge summary and the patient's medication use were classified into six categories. A panel assessed the potential clinical relevance of the MDs in a short-term and long-term perspective.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>150 patients, median age 75 years (range 22-94), were included. 132 (88 %) had at least one MD, with a median of 3 per patient (range 0-10). The most common MDs involved medications in use although not listed in the discharge summary. Apparent lack of or insufficient medication reconciliation during the hospital stay was the most frequent reason for MDs. Of the MDs, 5.5 % and 28 % were assessed to be of potential clinical relevance in the short-term and long-term perspective, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Almost all patients had MDs following hospital discharge. The potential clinical relevance increases over time if MDs are not corrected. Our findings highlight the need for more effective interventions to ensure medication safety in care transitions for this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":48126,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discrepancies in medication lists after hospital discharge in patients with multiple long-term conditions.\",\"authors\":\"Malin Olsen Syversen, Mikas Glatkauskas, Sandra Johanne Sedeniussen, Monica Hauge, Steffi Benny, Kristine Horgen, Marianne Lea, Rita Romskaug, Anne Mette Njaastad, Torunn Wibe, Karin Svensberg, Liv Mathiesen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sapharm.2025.03.062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inadequate information flow in the transition from hospital to home poses a challenge to medication safety, especially for patients with multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the frequency, categories, underlying reasons, and potential clinical relevance of medication discrepancies (MDs) by comparing medication lists in hospital discharge summaries with actual medication use after discharge in patients with MLTCs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Home-dwelling adult patients with MLTCs, using minimum four medications were included near the time of their planned discharge, from one internal medicine and two geriatric wards in Oslo, to this cross-sectional observational study. Medication reconciliation was performed 1-2 weeks post-discharge. Discrepancies between the medication list in the discharge summary and the patient's medication use were classified into six categories. A panel assessed the potential clinical relevance of the MDs in a short-term and long-term perspective.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>150 patients, median age 75 years (range 22-94), were included. 132 (88 %) had at least one MD, with a median of 3 per patient (range 0-10). The most common MDs involved medications in use although not listed in the discharge summary. Apparent lack of or insufficient medication reconciliation during the hospital stay was the most frequent reason for MDs. Of the MDs, 5.5 % and 28 % were assessed to be of potential clinical relevance in the short-term and long-term perspective, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Almost all patients had MDs following hospital discharge. The potential clinical relevance increases over time if MDs are not corrected. Our findings highlight the need for more effective interventions to ensure medication safety in care transitions for this vulnerable population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2025.03.062\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2025.03.062","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在从医院到家庭的过渡过程中,信息流不足对用药安全构成了挑战,特别是对于患有多种长期疾病的患者(MLTCs)。目的:通过比较MLTCs患者出院总结用药清单与出院后实际用药情况,探讨用药差异(MDs)的发生频率、类别、潜在原因及潜在临床相关性。方法:在奥斯陆的一个内科病房和两个老年病房中,在计划出院时至少使用四种药物的MLTCs家庭成年患者被纳入这项横断面观察研究。出院后1-2周进行药物调节。出院总结中用药清单与患者用药情况的差异分为6类。一个小组从短期和长期的角度评估了MDs的潜在临床相关性。结果:纳入150例患者,中位年龄75岁(范围22-94)。132例(88%)患者至少有1例MD,中位数为3例(范围0-10)。最常见的MDs涉及正在使用的药物,但未在出院摘要中列出。住院期间明显缺乏或不充分的药物调节是MDs最常见的原因。在MDs中,5.5%和28%分别被评估为短期和长期的潜在临床相关性。结论:几乎所有患者出院后均出现MDs。如果不纠正MDs,潜在的临床相关性会随着时间的推移而增加。我们的研究结果强调需要更有效的干预措施,以确保这一弱势群体在护理过渡中的用药安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discrepancies in medication lists after hospital discharge in patients with multiple long-term conditions.

Background: Inadequate information flow in the transition from hospital to home poses a challenge to medication safety, especially for patients with multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs).

Purpose: To investigate the frequency, categories, underlying reasons, and potential clinical relevance of medication discrepancies (MDs) by comparing medication lists in hospital discharge summaries with actual medication use after discharge in patients with MLTCs.

Methods: Home-dwelling adult patients with MLTCs, using minimum four medications were included near the time of their planned discharge, from one internal medicine and two geriatric wards in Oslo, to this cross-sectional observational study. Medication reconciliation was performed 1-2 weeks post-discharge. Discrepancies between the medication list in the discharge summary and the patient's medication use were classified into six categories. A panel assessed the potential clinical relevance of the MDs in a short-term and long-term perspective.

Results: 150 patients, median age 75 years (range 22-94), were included. 132 (88 %) had at least one MD, with a median of 3 per patient (range 0-10). The most common MDs involved medications in use although not listed in the discharge summary. Apparent lack of or insufficient medication reconciliation during the hospital stay was the most frequent reason for MDs. Of the MDs, 5.5 % and 28 % were assessed to be of potential clinical relevance in the short-term and long-term perspective, respectively.

Conclusion: Almost all patients had MDs following hospital discharge. The potential clinical relevance increases over time if MDs are not corrected. Our findings highlight the need for more effective interventions to ensure medication safety in care transitions for this vulnerable population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
225
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy (RSAP) is a quarterly publication featuring original scientific reports and comprehensive review articles in the social and administrative pharmaceutical sciences. Topics of interest include outcomes evaluation of products, programs, or services; pharmacoepidemiology; medication adherence; direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications; disease state management; health systems reform; drug marketing; medication distribution systems such as e-prescribing; web-based pharmaceutical/medical services; drug commerce and re-importation; and health professions workforce issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信