{"title":"牙槽外微型螺钉:所有品牌都相似吗?","authors":"Karina Tostes Borsato, Raissa Mariele Bernardino, Lucas Arrais Campos, Daniela Águida Bento, Luiz Geraldo Vaz, Luiz Gonzaga Gandini Júnior","doi":"10.1590/2177-6709.30.1.e2524221.oar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A wide variety of extra-alveolar orthodontic miniscrews are available.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to describe and compare the design, and the topographical and mechanical properties of five distinct commercial brands of extra-alveolar miniscrews.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), using 25×, 50×, 100×, and 200× photomicrographs, and in-vitro mechanical tests (driving torque, torsion, and pullout test) to compare extra-alveolar miniscrews (n=80, 2 mm x 12 mm) from the following brands: Bioray, DatSteel, Morelli, OBS, and Peclab.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite the 2 × 12 mm screw size, only the Morelli and Peclab miniscrews actually measured 12 mm in thread length. The studied brands revealed different thread characteristics (i.e., thread pitch and minor/major diameter). The Morelli miniscrews presented the smallest thread pitch and, consequently, the largest number of threads. Bioray, DatSteel, and OBS miniscrews presented a trapezoidal thread shape, while the others were triangular. SEM showed adequate polishing on the Morelli, OBS, and Peclab miniscrews. The insertion torque was higher than the removal torque for the DatSteel, Morelli, and OBS miniscrews during the driving torque test of the first four threads. The same result occurred with Morelli miniscrews during the driving torque test of the full screw. The resistance limits recorded in the pullout tests were significantly higher than the maximum force used in orthodontic tooth movement. The findings showed no significant differences between the results of the titanium and steel miniscrews.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The five types of miniscrews studied presented different characteristics, so the clinician must consider the correct size, number of threads, length, polishing surface, and metallic alloy when choosing the appropriate miniscrew for an application.</p>","PeriodicalId":38720,"journal":{"name":"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"30 1","pages":"e2524221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11939427/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extra-alveolar miniscrews: are all brands similar?\",\"authors\":\"Karina Tostes Borsato, Raissa Mariele Bernardino, Lucas Arrais Campos, Daniela Águida Bento, Luiz Geraldo Vaz, Luiz Gonzaga Gandini Júnior\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/2177-6709.30.1.e2524221.oar\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A wide variety of extra-alveolar orthodontic miniscrews are available.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to describe and compare the design, and the topographical and mechanical properties of five distinct commercial brands of extra-alveolar miniscrews.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), using 25×, 50×, 100×, and 200× photomicrographs, and in-vitro mechanical tests (driving torque, torsion, and pullout test) to compare extra-alveolar miniscrews (n=80, 2 mm x 12 mm) from the following brands: Bioray, DatSteel, Morelli, OBS, and Peclab.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite the 2 × 12 mm screw size, only the Morelli and Peclab miniscrews actually measured 12 mm in thread length. The studied brands revealed different thread characteristics (i.e., thread pitch and minor/major diameter). The Morelli miniscrews presented the smallest thread pitch and, consequently, the largest number of threads. Bioray, DatSteel, and OBS miniscrews presented a trapezoidal thread shape, while the others were triangular. SEM showed adequate polishing on the Morelli, OBS, and Peclab miniscrews. The insertion torque was higher than the removal torque for the DatSteel, Morelli, and OBS miniscrews during the driving torque test of the first four threads. The same result occurred with Morelli miniscrews during the driving torque test of the full screw. The resistance limits recorded in the pullout tests were significantly higher than the maximum force used in orthodontic tooth movement. The findings showed no significant differences between the results of the titanium and steel miniscrews.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The five types of miniscrews studied presented different characteristics, so the clinician must consider the correct size, number of threads, length, polishing surface, and metallic alloy when choosing the appropriate miniscrew for an application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"e2524221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11939427/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.30.1.e2524221.oar\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.30.1.e2524221.oar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
介绍:有各种各样的牙槽外正畸微型支架可供选择。目的:本研究旨在描述和比较五种不同商业品牌的牙槽外微型支架的设计、地形和力学性能。方法:使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM),使用25倍、50倍、100倍和200倍的显微照片,并进行体外力学测试(驱动扭矩、扭矩和拔出测试),比较来自以下品牌的牙槽外微型螺钉(n=80, 2 mm x 12 mm): Bioray、DatSteel、Morelli、OBS和Peclab。结果:尽管螺钉尺寸为2 × 12 mm,但只有Morelli和Peclab微型螺钉的螺纹长度为12 mm。所研究的品牌显示出不同的螺纹特征(即螺纹节距和小/大直径)。Morelli微型螺钉的螺纹间距最小,因此螺纹数量最多。Bioray、DatSteel和OBS微型螺钉呈梯形螺纹形状,而其他微型螺钉呈三角形。扫描电镜显示在Morelli, OBS和Peclab微型螺钉上有足够的抛光。在前四根螺纹的驱动扭矩测试中,插入扭矩高于DatSteel、Morelli和OBS微型螺钉的移除扭矩。在全螺杆的驱动扭矩测试中,Morelli微型螺钉也出现了相同的结果。拔牙试验中记录的阻力极限明显高于正畸牙齿移动时使用的最大力。结果显示钛和钢微型螺钉的结果没有显著差异。结论:所研究的五种微螺钉具有不同的特点,临床医生在选择合适的微螺钉时必须考虑正确的尺寸、螺纹数、长度、抛光表面和金属合金。
Extra-alveolar miniscrews: are all brands similar?
Introduction: A wide variety of extra-alveolar orthodontic miniscrews are available.
Objective: This study aims to describe and compare the design, and the topographical and mechanical properties of five distinct commercial brands of extra-alveolar miniscrews.
Methods: Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), using 25×, 50×, 100×, and 200× photomicrographs, and in-vitro mechanical tests (driving torque, torsion, and pullout test) to compare extra-alveolar miniscrews (n=80, 2 mm x 12 mm) from the following brands: Bioray, DatSteel, Morelli, OBS, and Peclab.
Results: Despite the 2 × 12 mm screw size, only the Morelli and Peclab miniscrews actually measured 12 mm in thread length. The studied brands revealed different thread characteristics (i.e., thread pitch and minor/major diameter). The Morelli miniscrews presented the smallest thread pitch and, consequently, the largest number of threads. Bioray, DatSteel, and OBS miniscrews presented a trapezoidal thread shape, while the others were triangular. SEM showed adequate polishing on the Morelli, OBS, and Peclab miniscrews. The insertion torque was higher than the removal torque for the DatSteel, Morelli, and OBS miniscrews during the driving torque test of the first four threads. The same result occurred with Morelli miniscrews during the driving torque test of the full screw. The resistance limits recorded in the pullout tests were significantly higher than the maximum force used in orthodontic tooth movement. The findings showed no significant differences between the results of the titanium and steel miniscrews.
Conclusions: The five types of miniscrews studied presented different characteristics, so the clinician must consider the correct size, number of threads, length, polishing surface, and metallic alloy when choosing the appropriate miniscrew for an application.
期刊介绍:
The Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics publishes scientific research articles, significant reviews, clinical and technical case reports, brief communications, and other materials related to Orthodontics and Facial Orthopedics.