交叉性与大学生心理健康:一种危险指数方法。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Revista de saude publica Pub Date : 2025-03-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.11606/s1518-8787.2025059006197
Juliana Dias de Lima, Jessica Plácido, Beatriz Andrade, Letícia Dalcero Abend, Aline Josiane Waclawovsky, Daniel Alves Pires, Danilo Rodrigues Pereira da Silva, Fabianna Resende de Jesus-Moraleida, Helena Ferreira Moura, Nicole Leite Galvão Coelho, Renato Sobral Monteiro-Junior, Thiago Sousa Matias, Felipe Barreto Schuch, Andrea Camaz Deslandes
{"title":"交叉性与大学生心理健康:一种危险指数方法。","authors":"Juliana Dias de Lima, Jessica Plácido, Beatriz Andrade, Letícia Dalcero Abend, Aline Josiane Waclawovsky, Daniel Alves Pires, Danilo Rodrigues Pereira da Silva, Fabianna Resende de Jesus-Moraleida, Helena Ferreira Moura, Nicole Leite Galvão Coelho, Renato Sobral Monteiro-Junior, Thiago Sousa Matias, Felipe Barreto Schuch, Andrea Camaz Deslandes","doi":"10.11606/s1518-8787.2025059006197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To explore the associations between current mental health symptoms and social disparities in university students.</p><p><p>We recruited participants from nine public universities in Brazil, from August to November 2022, using online advertisements and in-person lectures. All participants completed an online survey containing social (sex, race/color, gender identity, sexual orientation, and income) and mental health assessments. The Jeopardy index was composed of social variables. The index considered zero points for subjects with less oppressive experienced characteristics (men, White, cisgender, heterosexual, higher income) and one point for the opposite characteristics. We defined six clusters according to Jeopardy Index results: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 points, with the greatest number of points representing the most disadvantaged group. The mental health symptoms were assessed on two levels. First by the \"DSM-5 Self-Rated Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure - Adult,\" and second by the \"Patient Health Questionnaire-9,\" and the \"Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire-7.\" Adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) analyses was performed for age and educational level.</p><p><p>748 participants were allocated into the six Jeopardy clusters: 0 (n = 46; 6.1%), 1 (n = 112; 15.0%), 2 (n = 163; 21.8%), 3 (n = 218; 29.1%), 4 (n = 171; 22.9%), and 5 (n = 38; 5.1%). It was observed a high prevalence of anxiety (42.5%) and depression (51.0%), however, the less privileged group (5) had a higher risk of having severe symptoms of anxiety (OR = 6.21; 1.51-25.58; p < 0.01) and depression (OR = 8.60; 2.15-34.43; p < 0.01), compared against the most privileged group.</p><p><p>Although anxiety and depressive symptoms were highly prevalent for all participants, these disorders are not equally distributed in this population and the intersectionality between social factors plays an important role in contributing to these differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":21230,"journal":{"name":"Revista de saude publica","volume":"59 ","pages":"e3"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11939081/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intersectionality and mental health in university students: a jeopardy index approach.\",\"authors\":\"Juliana Dias de Lima, Jessica Plácido, Beatriz Andrade, Letícia Dalcero Abend, Aline Josiane Waclawovsky, Daniel Alves Pires, Danilo Rodrigues Pereira da Silva, Fabianna Resende de Jesus-Moraleida, Helena Ferreira Moura, Nicole Leite Galvão Coelho, Renato Sobral Monteiro-Junior, Thiago Sousa Matias, Felipe Barreto Schuch, Andrea Camaz Deslandes\",\"doi\":\"10.11606/s1518-8787.2025059006197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To explore the associations between current mental health symptoms and social disparities in university students.</p><p><p>We recruited participants from nine public universities in Brazil, from August to November 2022, using online advertisements and in-person lectures. All participants completed an online survey containing social (sex, race/color, gender identity, sexual orientation, and income) and mental health assessments. The Jeopardy index was composed of social variables. The index considered zero points for subjects with less oppressive experienced characteristics (men, White, cisgender, heterosexual, higher income) and one point for the opposite characteristics. We defined six clusters according to Jeopardy Index results: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 points, with the greatest number of points representing the most disadvantaged group. The mental health symptoms were assessed on two levels. First by the \\\"DSM-5 Self-Rated Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure - Adult,\\\" and second by the \\\"Patient Health Questionnaire-9,\\\" and the \\\"Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire-7.\\\" Adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) analyses was performed for age and educational level.</p><p><p>748 participants were allocated into the six Jeopardy clusters: 0 (n = 46; 6.1%), 1 (n = 112; 15.0%), 2 (n = 163; 21.8%), 3 (n = 218; 29.1%), 4 (n = 171; 22.9%), and 5 (n = 38; 5.1%). It was observed a high prevalence of anxiety (42.5%) and depression (51.0%), however, the less privileged group (5) had a higher risk of having severe symptoms of anxiety (OR = 6.21; 1.51-25.58; p < 0.01) and depression (OR = 8.60; 2.15-34.43; p < 0.01), compared against the most privileged group.</p><p><p>Although anxiety and depressive symptoms were highly prevalent for all participants, these disorders are not equally distributed in this population and the intersectionality between social factors plays an important role in contributing to these differences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de saude publica\",\"volume\":\"59 \",\"pages\":\"e3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11939081/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de saude publica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2025059006197\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de saude publica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2025059006197","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

探讨大学生当前心理健康症状与社会差异的关系。从2022年8月到11月,我们从巴西的9所公立大学招募了参与者,使用在线广告和面对面的讲座。所有参与者都完成了一项在线调查,其中包括社会(性别、种族/肤色、性别认同、性取向和收入)和心理健康评估。危险指数由社会变量组成。该指数认为,具有较少压抑经历特征(男性、白人、顺性、异性恋、高收入)的受试者得零分,相反特征的受试者得一分。我们根据危险指数的结果定义了六个集群:0、1、2、3、4和5分,最大的分数代表最弱势的群体。心理健康症状在两个层面上进行评估。首先是“DSM-5自评一级交叉症状测量-成人”,其次是“患者健康问卷-9”和“广泛性焦虑障碍问卷-7”。对年龄和教育水平进行校正优势比(OR)分析。748名参与者被分配到六个危险组:0 (n = 46;6.1%), 1 (n = 112;15.0%), 2 (n = 163;21.8%), 3 (n = 218;29.1%), 4 (n = 171;22.9%), 5 (n = 38;5.1%)。观察到焦虑(42.5%)和抑郁(51.0%)的患病率很高,然而,地位较低的群体(5)出现严重焦虑症状的风险较高(OR = 6.21;1.51 - -25.58;p尽管焦虑和抑郁症状在所有参与者中都非常普遍,但这些疾病在该人群中的分布并不均匀,社会因素之间的相互作用在造成这些差异方面起着重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intersectionality and mental health in university students: a jeopardy index approach.

To explore the associations between current mental health symptoms and social disparities in university students.

We recruited participants from nine public universities in Brazil, from August to November 2022, using online advertisements and in-person lectures. All participants completed an online survey containing social (sex, race/color, gender identity, sexual orientation, and income) and mental health assessments. The Jeopardy index was composed of social variables. The index considered zero points for subjects with less oppressive experienced characteristics (men, White, cisgender, heterosexual, higher income) and one point for the opposite characteristics. We defined six clusters according to Jeopardy Index results: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 points, with the greatest number of points representing the most disadvantaged group. The mental health symptoms were assessed on two levels. First by the "DSM-5 Self-Rated Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure - Adult," and second by the "Patient Health Questionnaire-9," and the "Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire-7." Adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) analyses was performed for age and educational level.

748 participants were allocated into the six Jeopardy clusters: 0 (n = 46; 6.1%), 1 (n = 112; 15.0%), 2 (n = 163; 21.8%), 3 (n = 218; 29.1%), 4 (n = 171; 22.9%), and 5 (n = 38; 5.1%). It was observed a high prevalence of anxiety (42.5%) and depression (51.0%), however, the less privileged group (5) had a higher risk of having severe symptoms of anxiety (OR = 6.21; 1.51-25.58; p < 0.01) and depression (OR = 8.60; 2.15-34.43; p < 0.01), compared against the most privileged group.

Although anxiety and depressive symptoms were highly prevalent for all participants, these disorders are not equally distributed in this population and the intersectionality between social factors plays an important role in contributing to these differences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de saude publica
Revista de saude publica PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
93
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista de Saúde Pública has the purpose of publishing original scientific contributions on topics of relevance to public health in general.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信