治疗方法评价:软组织坏死性感染及万古霉素+克林霉素与利奈唑胺的选择。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Joanna Nixon, Sara E Parli, Jacqueline M Bishop, Katie B Olney, Jeremy VanHoose, Alexandra Wiegand, Dina Ali, Courtney Bradley, Zachary D Warriner, Abigail Leonhard, Aric Schadler, William J Olney
{"title":"治疗方法评价:软组织坏死性感染及万古霉素+克林霉素与利奈唑胺的选择。","authors":"Joanna Nixon, Sara E Parli, Jacqueline M Bishop, Katie B Olney, Jeremy VanHoose, Alexandra Wiegand, Dina Ali, Courtney Bradley, Zachary D Warriner, Abigail Leonhard, Aric Schadler, William J Olney","doi":"10.1089/sur.2024.281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Necrotizing skin and soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are life threatening, requiring antibiotic agents and surgical intervention. Clindamycin or linezolid is recommended as an adjunct therapy for toxin mediation; however, limited data are comparing clindamycin-based to linezolid-based regimens in NSTI. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This single-center retrospective study included adults with NSTI admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at the University of Kentucky HealthCare for surgical debridement between January 2017 and June 2023. Patients were excluded if they received antibiotic agents for <24 hours, underwent surgical debridement at an outside hospital, or were readmitted within the study period. The primary outcome was the number of debridements before source control. Secondary outcomes included time to source control, acute kidney injury (AKI) rates, ICU length of stay, and antibiotic duration. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 242 patients were included with 199 receiving clindamycin and 43 receiving linezolid. There was no difference observed in the number of surgical debridements between the clindamycin and linezolid cohorts ([2.0 (2, 4) vs. 3.0 (2, 4)]; p = 0.219). The multi-variable regression identified independent parameters that predicted a significant increase in number of debridements included sequential organ failure assessment score (1.03 [1.003, 1.047]; p = 0.028), culture(s) positive for <i>Streptococcus anginosus, Streptococcus constellatus</i>, or <i>Streptococcus intermedius</i> (1.309 [1.042, 1.629]; p = 0.018), and <i>Bacteroides</i> spp. (1.301 [1.048, 1.602]; p = 0.015). No differences were observed in AKI ([53.8% vs. 60.8%], p = 0.424), ICU stay ([5.3 vs. 6.1 d]; p = 0.399), or antibiotic duration between vancomycin, clindamycin, and linezolid ([5.6 vs. 5.6 vs. 6.7 d]; p = 0.683), respectively. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Linezolid resulted in a similar number of surgical debridements compared with clindamycin in NSTI patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22109,"journal":{"name":"Surgical infections","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Therapeutic Approaches: Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections and the Choice Between Vancomycin + Clindamycin and Linezolid.\",\"authors\":\"Joanna Nixon, Sara E Parli, Jacqueline M Bishop, Katie B Olney, Jeremy VanHoose, Alexandra Wiegand, Dina Ali, Courtney Bradley, Zachary D Warriner, Abigail Leonhard, Aric Schadler, William J Olney\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/sur.2024.281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Necrotizing skin and soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are life threatening, requiring antibiotic agents and surgical intervention. Clindamycin or linezolid is recommended as an adjunct therapy for toxin mediation; however, limited data are comparing clindamycin-based to linezolid-based regimens in NSTI. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This single-center retrospective study included adults with NSTI admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at the University of Kentucky HealthCare for surgical debridement between January 2017 and June 2023. Patients were excluded if they received antibiotic agents for <24 hours, underwent surgical debridement at an outside hospital, or were readmitted within the study period. The primary outcome was the number of debridements before source control. Secondary outcomes included time to source control, acute kidney injury (AKI) rates, ICU length of stay, and antibiotic duration. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 242 patients were included with 199 receiving clindamycin and 43 receiving linezolid. There was no difference observed in the number of surgical debridements between the clindamycin and linezolid cohorts ([2.0 (2, 4) vs. 3.0 (2, 4)]; p = 0.219). The multi-variable regression identified independent parameters that predicted a significant increase in number of debridements included sequential organ failure assessment score (1.03 [1.003, 1.047]; p = 0.028), culture(s) positive for <i>Streptococcus anginosus, Streptococcus constellatus</i>, or <i>Streptococcus intermedius</i> (1.309 [1.042, 1.629]; p = 0.018), and <i>Bacteroides</i> spp. (1.301 [1.048, 1.602]; p = 0.015). No differences were observed in AKI ([53.8% vs. 60.8%], p = 0.424), ICU stay ([5.3 vs. 6.1 d]; p = 0.399), or antibiotic duration between vancomycin, clindamycin, and linezolid ([5.6 vs. 5.6 vs. 6.7 d]; p = 0.683), respectively. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Linezolid resulted in a similar number of surgical debridements compared with clindamycin in NSTI patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical infections\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical infections\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2024.281\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical infections","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2024.281","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:坏死性皮肤和软组织感染(NSTIs)是危及生命的,需要抗生素和手术干预。克林霉素或利奈唑胺被推荐作为毒素调解的辅助治疗;然而,比较基于克林霉素和基于利奈唑胺的NSTI方案的数据有限。方法:这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了2017年1月至2023年6月在肯塔基大学医疗保健中心重症监护病房(ICU)接受手术清创的NSTI成人患者。结果:共纳入242例患者,其中克林霉素199例,利奈唑胺43例。克林霉素组和利奈唑胺组在手术清创次数上没有差异([2.0 (2,4)vs. 3.0 (2,4)];P = 0.219)。多变量回归确定预测清创次数显著增加的独立参数包括序贯器官衰竭评估评分(1.03 [1.003,1.047];p = 0.028),血管链球菌、星座链球菌或中间链球菌培养阳性(1.309 [1.042,1.629];p = 0.018),拟杆菌属(1.301 [1.048,1.602];P = 0.015)。AKI([53.8%对60.8%],p = 0.424)、ICU住院时间([5.3对6.1 d];P = 0.399),或万古霉素、克林霉素和利奈唑胺之间的抗生素持续时间([5.6 vs. 5.6 vs. 6.7 d];P = 0.683)。结论:与克林霉素相比,利奈唑胺对NSTI患者的手术清创次数相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Therapeutic Approaches: Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections and the Choice Between Vancomycin + Clindamycin and Linezolid.

Background: Necrotizing skin and soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are life threatening, requiring antibiotic agents and surgical intervention. Clindamycin or linezolid is recommended as an adjunct therapy for toxin mediation; however, limited data are comparing clindamycin-based to linezolid-based regimens in NSTI. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included adults with NSTI admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at the University of Kentucky HealthCare for surgical debridement between January 2017 and June 2023. Patients were excluded if they received antibiotic agents for <24 hours, underwent surgical debridement at an outside hospital, or were readmitted within the study period. The primary outcome was the number of debridements before source control. Secondary outcomes included time to source control, acute kidney injury (AKI) rates, ICU length of stay, and antibiotic duration. Results: A total of 242 patients were included with 199 receiving clindamycin and 43 receiving linezolid. There was no difference observed in the number of surgical debridements between the clindamycin and linezolid cohorts ([2.0 (2, 4) vs. 3.0 (2, 4)]; p = 0.219). The multi-variable regression identified independent parameters that predicted a significant increase in number of debridements included sequential organ failure assessment score (1.03 [1.003, 1.047]; p = 0.028), culture(s) positive for Streptococcus anginosus, Streptococcus constellatus, or Streptococcus intermedius (1.309 [1.042, 1.629]; p = 0.018), and Bacteroides spp. (1.301 [1.048, 1.602]; p = 0.015). No differences were observed in AKI ([53.8% vs. 60.8%], p = 0.424), ICU stay ([5.3 vs. 6.1 d]; p = 0.399), or antibiotic duration between vancomycin, clindamycin, and linezolid ([5.6 vs. 5.6 vs. 6.7 d]; p = 0.683), respectively. Conclusions: Linezolid resulted in a similar number of surgical debridements compared with clindamycin in NSTI patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical infections
Surgical infections INFECTIOUS DISEASES-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Infections provides comprehensive and authoritative information on the biology, prevention, and management of post-operative infections. Original articles cover the latest advancements, new therapeutic management strategies, and translational research that is being applied to improve clinical outcomes and successfully treat post-operative infections. Surgical Infections coverage includes: -Peritonitis and intra-abdominal infections- Surgical site infections- Pneumonia and other nosocomial infections- Cellular and humoral immunity- Biology of the host response- Organ dysfunction syndromes- Antibiotic use- Resistant and opportunistic pathogens- Epidemiology and prevention- The operating room environment- Diagnostic studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信