在英国调查尼古丁小袋包装、味道和尼古丁描述符对成年人的吸引力:一项在线实验。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Eve Taylor, Madeleine Ebdon, Matilda Nottage, Erikas Simonavicius, Leonie Brose, Ann McNeill, Deborah Arnott, Hazel Cheeseman, Laura Bunce, Katherine East
{"title":"在英国调查尼古丁小袋包装、味道和尼古丁描述符对成年人的吸引力:一项在线实验。","authors":"Eve Taylor, Madeleine Ebdon, Matilda Nottage, Erikas Simonavicius, Leonie Brose, Ann McNeill, Deborah Arnott, Hazel Cheeseman, Laura Bunce, Katherine East","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introdcution: </strong>Nicotine pouches have the potential to be used for tobacco harm reduction. Pouches can currently be sold in brightly coloured packaging with conceptual flavour and nicotine descriptors, which may appeal to youth. Therefore, the UK government are considering packaging regulations. We examined the impact of standardised packaging, limiting flavour names and standardising nicotine descriptors on appeal and harm perceptions of nicotine pouches among adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 2024 Prolific Academic online experiment among UK Adults (N=2,967) was used. Participants were randomised to one of four packaging conditions: (1) branded, (2) standardised with usual descriptors, (3) standardised with limited flavour descriptors, and (4) standardised with limited flavour and standardised nicotine descriptors. Logistic regressions examined associations between packaging conditions and (a) no interest in trying the products displayed and (b) harm perceptions relative to cigarettes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in reporting no interest in trying nicotine pouches in branded compared to standardised packaging with usual descriptors, standardised packaging with limited flavour descriptors, and standardised packaging with limited flavour and nicotine descriptors. When stratified by vaping/smoking status, participants who currently vaped had lower odds of reporting no interest in standardised packaging with limited flavour descriptors, compared to branded. There were no significant differences in harm perceptions by packaging condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, standardising packaging, limiting flavour descriptors, and standardising nicotine descriptors had little effect on adults' interest in trying nicotine pouches or their perceptions of relative harm. There were, however, some differences by vaping status.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Findings suggest that if a standardised packaging, flavour and nicotine descriptors policy is introduced for nicotine pouches to deter youth use, there might be little impact on appeal or harm perceptions among adults. This is important because nicotine pouches could be a helpful part of the toolkit for tobacco harm reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the Appeal of Nicotine Pouch Packaging, Flavour and Nicotine Descriptors among Adults in the UK: An Online Experiment.\",\"authors\":\"Eve Taylor, Madeleine Ebdon, Matilda Nottage, Erikas Simonavicius, Leonie Brose, Ann McNeill, Deborah Arnott, Hazel Cheeseman, Laura Bunce, Katherine East\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ntr/ntaf072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introdcution: </strong>Nicotine pouches have the potential to be used for tobacco harm reduction. Pouches can currently be sold in brightly coloured packaging with conceptual flavour and nicotine descriptors, which may appeal to youth. Therefore, the UK government are considering packaging regulations. We examined the impact of standardised packaging, limiting flavour names and standardising nicotine descriptors on appeal and harm perceptions of nicotine pouches among adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 2024 Prolific Academic online experiment among UK Adults (N=2,967) was used. Participants were randomised to one of four packaging conditions: (1) branded, (2) standardised with usual descriptors, (3) standardised with limited flavour descriptors, and (4) standardised with limited flavour and standardised nicotine descriptors. Logistic regressions examined associations between packaging conditions and (a) no interest in trying the products displayed and (b) harm perceptions relative to cigarettes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in reporting no interest in trying nicotine pouches in branded compared to standardised packaging with usual descriptors, standardised packaging with limited flavour descriptors, and standardised packaging with limited flavour and nicotine descriptors. When stratified by vaping/smoking status, participants who currently vaped had lower odds of reporting no interest in standardised packaging with limited flavour descriptors, compared to branded. There were no significant differences in harm perceptions by packaging condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, standardising packaging, limiting flavour descriptors, and standardising nicotine descriptors had little effect on adults' interest in trying nicotine pouches or their perceptions of relative harm. There were, however, some differences by vaping status.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Findings suggest that if a standardised packaging, flavour and nicotine descriptors policy is introduced for nicotine pouches to deter youth use, there might be little impact on appeal or harm perceptions among adults. This is important because nicotine pouches could be a helpful part of the toolkit for tobacco harm reduction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf072\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf072","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:尼古丁袋具有减少烟草危害的潜力。目前,小袋香烟的包装颜色鲜艳,带有概念性的味道和尼古丁描述符,可能会吸引年轻人。因此,英国政府正在考虑包装法规。我们研究了标准化包装、限制口味名称和标准化尼古丁描述符对成年人尼古丁袋的吸引力和危害认知的影响。方法:采用2024年英国成人学术在线实验(N= 2967)。参与者被随机分配到四种包装条件中的一种:(1)品牌包装,(2)用常规描述符标准化,(3)用有限的味道描述符标准化,(4)用有限的味道和标准化的尼古丁描述符标准化。逻辑回归检验了包装条件与(a)没有兴趣尝试展示的产品和(b)与香烟有关的危害认知之间的关系。结果:与通常描述符的标准化包装、风味描述符有限的标准化包装和风味和尼古丁描述符有限的标准化包装相比,报告没有兴趣尝试品牌尼古丁小袋方面没有显着差异。当按吸电子烟/吸烟状况分层时,与品牌相比,目前吸电子烟的参与者报告对味道描述有限的标准化包装不感兴趣的几率较低。不同包装条件对危害认知的差异不显著。结论:总体而言,包装标准化、限制口味描述和尼古丁描述标准化对成年人尝试尼古丁袋的兴趣或他们对相对危害的认知影响不大。然而,吸电子烟的情况有所不同。含义:研究结果表明,如果为尼古丁袋引入标准化的包装、味道和尼古丁描述政策,以阻止青少年使用,可能对成年人的吸引力或危害认知影响不大。这一点很重要,因为尼古丁袋可能是减少烟草危害的有用工具之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating the Appeal of Nicotine Pouch Packaging, Flavour and Nicotine Descriptors among Adults in the UK: An Online Experiment.

Introdcution: Nicotine pouches have the potential to be used for tobacco harm reduction. Pouches can currently be sold in brightly coloured packaging with conceptual flavour and nicotine descriptors, which may appeal to youth. Therefore, the UK government are considering packaging regulations. We examined the impact of standardised packaging, limiting flavour names and standardising nicotine descriptors on appeal and harm perceptions of nicotine pouches among adults.

Methods: A 2024 Prolific Academic online experiment among UK Adults (N=2,967) was used. Participants were randomised to one of four packaging conditions: (1) branded, (2) standardised with usual descriptors, (3) standardised with limited flavour descriptors, and (4) standardised with limited flavour and standardised nicotine descriptors. Logistic regressions examined associations between packaging conditions and (a) no interest in trying the products displayed and (b) harm perceptions relative to cigarettes.

Results: There were no significant differences in reporting no interest in trying nicotine pouches in branded compared to standardised packaging with usual descriptors, standardised packaging with limited flavour descriptors, and standardised packaging with limited flavour and nicotine descriptors. When stratified by vaping/smoking status, participants who currently vaped had lower odds of reporting no interest in standardised packaging with limited flavour descriptors, compared to branded. There were no significant differences in harm perceptions by packaging condition.

Conclusions: Overall, standardising packaging, limiting flavour descriptors, and standardising nicotine descriptors had little effect on adults' interest in trying nicotine pouches or their perceptions of relative harm. There were, however, some differences by vaping status.

Implications: Findings suggest that if a standardised packaging, flavour and nicotine descriptors policy is introduced for nicotine pouches to deter youth use, there might be little impact on appeal or harm perceptions among adults. This is important because nicotine pouches could be a helpful part of the toolkit for tobacco harm reduction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信