评估CO2激光和微针治疗扩张纹:一项综合荟萃分析和系统综述。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Amun Mustafa, Rimsha Zahid, Saniah Khan, Manal Faisal, M Ahmad Hassan Farooq, Junaid Imran, Waqar Malik, Arwa Khan, Basit Azeem, Areeba Maryam, Satesh Kumar, Mahima Khatri
{"title":"评估CO2激光和微针治疗扩张纹:一项综合荟萃分析和系统综述。","authors":"Amun Mustafa, Rimsha Zahid, Saniah Khan, Manal Faisal, M Ahmad Hassan Farooq, Junaid Imran, Waqar Malik, Arwa Khan, Basit Azeem, Areeba Maryam, Satesh Kumar, Mahima Khatri","doi":"10.1007/s10103-025-04420-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Striae distensae (SD), commonly known as stretch marks, are a prevalent cosmetic concern, particularly among women, with potential psychological impact. This meta-analysis aims to compare the effectiveness, safety, and patient satisfaction of two common SD treatments: Fractional CO2 10,064 nm (Fr CO2) laser and micro-needling. The primary focus is on clinical improvement, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) incidence, and morphological changes, specifically the cross-sectional area of the largest striae. Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including 166 patients were analyzed. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase. Systematic statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 to gauge the comparative effectiveness and safety of Fr CO2 laser and micro-needling. Meticulous Cochrane risk-of-bias assessments were conducted to ascertain the quality of included RCTs. Both Fr CO2 laser and micro-needling treatments demonstrated significant clinical improvements in SD appearance, benefiting over 70% of patients. However, no significant difference in clinical improvements (Relative Risk (RR) = 0.97 [0.74, 1.28], p = 0.85, I2 = 17%) and patient satisfaction scores (RR = 0.91 [0.52, 1.58], p = 0.10, I2 = 39%). A comparison of the cross-sectional area of the largest striae between the groups revealed no significant disparity (Mean Difference = 0.22 [-0.15, 0.58], p = 0.24, I2 = 0%). However, the CO2 group experienced significantly higher post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (RR = 8.37 [1.42, 49.44], p = 0.02, I2 = 68%). Both treatments are effective for SD, with similar clinical improvements and patient satisfaction. Micro-needling emerges as the safer option due to its lower risk of PIH. Treatment choice should be tailored to individual patient needs and preferences. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes and patient-reported measures in aesthetic dermatology.</p>","PeriodicalId":17978,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Medical Science","volume":"40 1","pages":"161"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating CO2 laser and micro-needling therapies for striae distensae: a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Amun Mustafa, Rimsha Zahid, Saniah Khan, Manal Faisal, M Ahmad Hassan Farooq, Junaid Imran, Waqar Malik, Arwa Khan, Basit Azeem, Areeba Maryam, Satesh Kumar, Mahima Khatri\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10103-025-04420-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Striae distensae (SD), commonly known as stretch marks, are a prevalent cosmetic concern, particularly among women, with potential psychological impact. This meta-analysis aims to compare the effectiveness, safety, and patient satisfaction of two common SD treatments: Fractional CO2 10,064 nm (Fr CO2) laser and micro-needling. The primary focus is on clinical improvement, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) incidence, and morphological changes, specifically the cross-sectional area of the largest striae. Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including 166 patients were analyzed. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase. Systematic statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 to gauge the comparative effectiveness and safety of Fr CO2 laser and micro-needling. Meticulous Cochrane risk-of-bias assessments were conducted to ascertain the quality of included RCTs. Both Fr CO2 laser and micro-needling treatments demonstrated significant clinical improvements in SD appearance, benefiting over 70% of patients. However, no significant difference in clinical improvements (Relative Risk (RR) = 0.97 [0.74, 1.28], p = 0.85, I2 = 17%) and patient satisfaction scores (RR = 0.91 [0.52, 1.58], p = 0.10, I2 = 39%). A comparison of the cross-sectional area of the largest striae between the groups revealed no significant disparity (Mean Difference = 0.22 [-0.15, 0.58], p = 0.24, I2 = 0%). However, the CO2 group experienced significantly higher post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (RR = 8.37 [1.42, 49.44], p = 0.02, I2 = 68%). Both treatments are effective for SD, with similar clinical improvements and patient satisfaction. Micro-needling emerges as the safer option due to its lower risk of PIH. Treatment choice should be tailored to individual patient needs and preferences. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes and patient-reported measures in aesthetic dermatology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lasers in Medical Science\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lasers in Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04420-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04420-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

扩张纹(SD),俗称妊娠纹,是一种普遍存在的美容问题,尤其是在女性中,具有潜在的心理影响。本荟萃分析旨在比较两种常见的SD治疗方法的有效性、安全性和患者满意度:10064 nm CO2激光和微针。主要关注临床改善、炎症后色素沉着(PIH)发生率和形态学改变,特别是最大纹的横截面积。分析6项随机对照试验(rct),共166例患者。使用PubMed、b谷歌Scholar和Embase进行了全面的文献检索。采用Review Manager 5.4进行系统统计分析,比较CO2激光与微针治疗的有效性和安全性。我们进行了细致的Cochrane风险偏倚评估,以确定纳入的随机对照试验的质量。Fr CO2激光和微针治疗均能显著改善SD外观,使70%以上的患者受益。但两组临床改善(相对危险度RR = 0.97 [0.74, 1.28], p = 0.85, I2 = 17%)和患者满意度评分(RR = 0.91 [0.52, 1.58], p = 0.10, I2 = 39%)差异无统计学意义。组间最大纹横截面积比较,差异无统计学意义(Mean Difference = 0.22 [-0.15, 0.58], p = 0.24, I2 = 0%)。然而,CO2组炎症后色素沉着明显增加(RR = 8.37 [1.42, 49.44], p = 0.02, I2 = 68%)。两种治疗方法对SD都有效,具有相似的临床改善和患者满意度。由于其较低的PIH风险,微针成为更安全的选择。治疗选择应根据个别患者的需要和偏好量身定制。未来的研究应侧重于美容皮肤科的长期结果和患者报告的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating CO2 laser and micro-needling therapies for striae distensae: a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review.

Striae distensae (SD), commonly known as stretch marks, are a prevalent cosmetic concern, particularly among women, with potential psychological impact. This meta-analysis aims to compare the effectiveness, safety, and patient satisfaction of two common SD treatments: Fractional CO2 10,064 nm (Fr CO2) laser and micro-needling. The primary focus is on clinical improvement, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) incidence, and morphological changes, specifically the cross-sectional area of the largest striae. Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including 166 patients were analyzed. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase. Systematic statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 to gauge the comparative effectiveness and safety of Fr CO2 laser and micro-needling. Meticulous Cochrane risk-of-bias assessments were conducted to ascertain the quality of included RCTs. Both Fr CO2 laser and micro-needling treatments demonstrated significant clinical improvements in SD appearance, benefiting over 70% of patients. However, no significant difference in clinical improvements (Relative Risk (RR) = 0.97 [0.74, 1.28], p = 0.85, I2 = 17%) and patient satisfaction scores (RR = 0.91 [0.52, 1.58], p = 0.10, I2 = 39%). A comparison of the cross-sectional area of the largest striae between the groups revealed no significant disparity (Mean Difference = 0.22 [-0.15, 0.58], p = 0.24, I2 = 0%). However, the CO2 group experienced significantly higher post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (RR = 8.37 [1.42, 49.44], p = 0.02, I2 = 68%). Both treatments are effective for SD, with similar clinical improvements and patient satisfaction. Micro-needling emerges as the safer option due to its lower risk of PIH. Treatment choice should be tailored to individual patient needs and preferences. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes and patient-reported measures in aesthetic dermatology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lasers in Medical Science
Lasers in Medical Science 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Lasers in Medical Science (LIMS) has established itself as the leading international journal in the rapidly expanding field of medical and dental applications of lasers and light. It provides a forum for the publication of papers on the technical, experimental, and clinical aspects of the use of medical lasers, including lasers in surgery, endoscopy, angioplasty, hyperthermia of tumors, and photodynamic therapy. In addition to medical laser applications, LIMS presents high-quality manuscripts on a wide range of dental topics, including aesthetic dentistry, endodontics, orthodontics, and prosthodontics. The journal publishes articles on the medical and dental applications of novel laser technologies, light delivery systems, sensors to monitor laser effects, basic laser-tissue interactions, and the modeling of laser-tissue interactions. Beyond laser applications, LIMS features articles relating to the use of non-laser light-tissue interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信