Amun Mustafa, Rimsha Zahid, Saniah Khan, Manal Faisal, M Ahmad Hassan Farooq, Junaid Imran, Waqar Malik, Arwa Khan, Basit Azeem, Areeba Maryam, Satesh Kumar, Mahima Khatri
{"title":"评估CO2激光和微针治疗扩张纹:一项综合荟萃分析和系统综述。","authors":"Amun Mustafa, Rimsha Zahid, Saniah Khan, Manal Faisal, M Ahmad Hassan Farooq, Junaid Imran, Waqar Malik, Arwa Khan, Basit Azeem, Areeba Maryam, Satesh Kumar, Mahima Khatri","doi":"10.1007/s10103-025-04420-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Striae distensae (SD), commonly known as stretch marks, are a prevalent cosmetic concern, particularly among women, with potential psychological impact. This meta-analysis aims to compare the effectiveness, safety, and patient satisfaction of two common SD treatments: Fractional CO2 10,064 nm (Fr CO2) laser and micro-needling. The primary focus is on clinical improvement, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) incidence, and morphological changes, specifically the cross-sectional area of the largest striae. Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including 166 patients were analyzed. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase. Systematic statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 to gauge the comparative effectiveness and safety of Fr CO2 laser and micro-needling. Meticulous Cochrane risk-of-bias assessments were conducted to ascertain the quality of included RCTs. Both Fr CO2 laser and micro-needling treatments demonstrated significant clinical improvements in SD appearance, benefiting over 70% of patients. However, no significant difference in clinical improvements (Relative Risk (RR) = 0.97 [0.74, 1.28], p = 0.85, I2 = 17%) and patient satisfaction scores (RR = 0.91 [0.52, 1.58], p = 0.10, I2 = 39%). A comparison of the cross-sectional area of the largest striae between the groups revealed no significant disparity (Mean Difference = 0.22 [-0.15, 0.58], p = 0.24, I2 = 0%). However, the CO2 group experienced significantly higher post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (RR = 8.37 [1.42, 49.44], p = 0.02, I2 = 68%). Both treatments are effective for SD, with similar clinical improvements and patient satisfaction. Micro-needling emerges as the safer option due to its lower risk of PIH. Treatment choice should be tailored to individual patient needs and preferences. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes and patient-reported measures in aesthetic dermatology.</p>","PeriodicalId":17978,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Medical Science","volume":"40 1","pages":"161"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating CO2 laser and micro-needling therapies for striae distensae: a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Amun Mustafa, Rimsha Zahid, Saniah Khan, Manal Faisal, M Ahmad Hassan Farooq, Junaid Imran, Waqar Malik, Arwa Khan, Basit Azeem, Areeba Maryam, Satesh Kumar, Mahima Khatri\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10103-025-04420-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Striae distensae (SD), commonly known as stretch marks, are a prevalent cosmetic concern, particularly among women, with potential psychological impact. This meta-analysis aims to compare the effectiveness, safety, and patient satisfaction of two common SD treatments: Fractional CO2 10,064 nm (Fr CO2) laser and micro-needling. The primary focus is on clinical improvement, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) incidence, and morphological changes, specifically the cross-sectional area of the largest striae. Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including 166 patients were analyzed. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase. Systematic statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 to gauge the comparative effectiveness and safety of Fr CO2 laser and micro-needling. Meticulous Cochrane risk-of-bias assessments were conducted to ascertain the quality of included RCTs. Both Fr CO2 laser and micro-needling treatments demonstrated significant clinical improvements in SD appearance, benefiting over 70% of patients. However, no significant difference in clinical improvements (Relative Risk (RR) = 0.97 [0.74, 1.28], p = 0.85, I2 = 17%) and patient satisfaction scores (RR = 0.91 [0.52, 1.58], p = 0.10, I2 = 39%). A comparison of the cross-sectional area of the largest striae between the groups revealed no significant disparity (Mean Difference = 0.22 [-0.15, 0.58], p = 0.24, I2 = 0%). However, the CO2 group experienced significantly higher post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (RR = 8.37 [1.42, 49.44], p = 0.02, I2 = 68%). Both treatments are effective for SD, with similar clinical improvements and patient satisfaction. Micro-needling emerges as the safer option due to its lower risk of PIH. Treatment choice should be tailored to individual patient needs and preferences. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes and patient-reported measures in aesthetic dermatology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lasers in Medical Science\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lasers in Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04420-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04420-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating CO2 laser and micro-needling therapies for striae distensae: a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review.
Striae distensae (SD), commonly known as stretch marks, are a prevalent cosmetic concern, particularly among women, with potential psychological impact. This meta-analysis aims to compare the effectiveness, safety, and patient satisfaction of two common SD treatments: Fractional CO2 10,064 nm (Fr CO2) laser and micro-needling. The primary focus is on clinical improvement, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) incidence, and morphological changes, specifically the cross-sectional area of the largest striae. Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including 166 patients were analyzed. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase. Systematic statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 to gauge the comparative effectiveness and safety of Fr CO2 laser and micro-needling. Meticulous Cochrane risk-of-bias assessments were conducted to ascertain the quality of included RCTs. Both Fr CO2 laser and micro-needling treatments demonstrated significant clinical improvements in SD appearance, benefiting over 70% of patients. However, no significant difference in clinical improvements (Relative Risk (RR) = 0.97 [0.74, 1.28], p = 0.85, I2 = 17%) and patient satisfaction scores (RR = 0.91 [0.52, 1.58], p = 0.10, I2 = 39%). A comparison of the cross-sectional area of the largest striae between the groups revealed no significant disparity (Mean Difference = 0.22 [-0.15, 0.58], p = 0.24, I2 = 0%). However, the CO2 group experienced significantly higher post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (RR = 8.37 [1.42, 49.44], p = 0.02, I2 = 68%). Both treatments are effective for SD, with similar clinical improvements and patient satisfaction. Micro-needling emerges as the safer option due to its lower risk of PIH. Treatment choice should be tailored to individual patient needs and preferences. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes and patient-reported measures in aesthetic dermatology.
期刊介绍:
Lasers in Medical Science (LIMS) has established itself as the leading international journal in the rapidly expanding field of medical and dental applications of lasers and light. It provides a forum for the publication of papers on the technical, experimental, and clinical aspects of the use of medical lasers, including lasers in surgery, endoscopy, angioplasty, hyperthermia of tumors, and photodynamic therapy. In addition to medical laser applications, LIMS presents high-quality manuscripts on a wide range of dental topics, including aesthetic dentistry, endodontics, orthodontics, and prosthodontics.
The journal publishes articles on the medical and dental applications of novel laser technologies, light delivery systems, sensors to monitor laser effects, basic laser-tissue interactions, and the modeling of laser-tissue interactions. Beyond laser applications, LIMS features articles relating to the use of non-laser light-tissue interactions.