肌肉电刺激对年轻女性负重运动中能量代谢的急性影响:一项交叉随机对照试验

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
Juseong Lee, Seung W Shin, Junghoon Kim
{"title":"肌肉电刺激对年轻女性负重运动中能量代谢的急性影响:一项交叉随机对照试验","authors":"Juseong Lee, Seung W Shin, Junghoon Kim","doi":"10.23736/S0022-4707.25.16158-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electrical muscle stimulation is an effective tool that provides additional benefits to energy metabolism, such as energy expenditure. However, it remains unclear which energy system influences the increase in energy expenditure during electrical muscle stimulation. The aim of this study was to determine the contribution of three energy systems (aerobic, anaerobic lactic, and anaerobic alactic) during a single session of weight-bearing exercise with EMS using a crossover randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten young females (mean age: 23.0±3.6 years) were randomly assigned to perform two types of exercises in a random order (WB: weight-bearing exercises without electrical muscle stimulation, N.=10; WB+EMS: weight-bearing exercises with electrical muscle stimulation, N.=10). During both sessions, we evaluated the oxygen consumption (absolute and relative), blood lactate concentration (before and after exercise), and heart rate. We then calculated the energy expenditure and percentage for the three energy systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>WB+EMS showed significantly higher oxygen consumption (P=0.016, effect size; d=0.94) than WB. The total energy expenditure was 25.7% higher in WB+EMS than in WB (84.4±17.1 vs. 67.1±15.4 kcal, P=0.045, d=0.74). In addition, the energy expenditure of the anaerobic lactic system was significantly higher in the WB+EMS (P=0.009, d=1.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that electrical muscle stimulation can contribute to an increased energy metabolism, particularly in the anaerobic energy system, even when performing the same type and duration of exercise.</p>","PeriodicalId":17013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute effects of electrical muscle stimulation on energy metabolism during weight-bearing exercise in young-female: a crossover randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Juseong Lee, Seung W Shin, Junghoon Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0022-4707.25.16158-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electrical muscle stimulation is an effective tool that provides additional benefits to energy metabolism, such as energy expenditure. However, it remains unclear which energy system influences the increase in energy expenditure during electrical muscle stimulation. The aim of this study was to determine the contribution of three energy systems (aerobic, anaerobic lactic, and anaerobic alactic) during a single session of weight-bearing exercise with EMS using a crossover randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten young females (mean age: 23.0±3.6 years) were randomly assigned to perform two types of exercises in a random order (WB: weight-bearing exercises without electrical muscle stimulation, N.=10; WB+EMS: weight-bearing exercises with electrical muscle stimulation, N.=10). During both sessions, we evaluated the oxygen consumption (absolute and relative), blood lactate concentration (before and after exercise), and heart rate. We then calculated the energy expenditure and percentage for the three energy systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>WB+EMS showed significantly higher oxygen consumption (P=0.016, effect size; d=0.94) than WB. The total energy expenditure was 25.7% higher in WB+EMS than in WB (84.4±17.1 vs. 67.1±15.4 kcal, P=0.045, d=0.74). In addition, the energy expenditure of the anaerobic lactic system was significantly higher in the WB+EMS (P=0.009, d=1.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that electrical muscle stimulation can contribute to an increased energy metabolism, particularly in the anaerobic energy system, even when performing the same type and duration of exercise.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.25.16158-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.25.16158-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肌肉电刺激是一种有效的工具,为能量代谢(如能量消耗)提供额外的好处。然而,目前尚不清楚是哪个能量系统影响了肌肉电刺激过程中能量消耗的增加。本研究的目的是通过交叉随机对照试验确定三种能量系统(有氧、无氧乳酸和无氧乳酸)在单次EMS负重运动中的作用。方法:10名年轻女性(平均年龄:23.0±3.6岁)随机分为两组(WB:无肌肉电刺激负重运动,n =10;WB+EMS:肌肉电刺激负重运动,n =10)。在这两个阶段,我们评估了耗氧量(绝对和相对)、血乳酸浓度(运动前后)和心率。然后,我们计算了三种能源系统的能量消耗和百分比。结果:WB+EMS患者耗氧量显著增高(P=0.016,效应量;d=0.94)大于WB。WB+EMS组总能量消耗比WB组高25.7%(84.4±17.1 kcal vs. 67.1±15.4 kcal, P=0.045, d=0.74)。此外,WB+EMS组厌氧乳酸系统的能量消耗显著高于对照组(P=0.009, d=1.06)。结论:这些发现表明,即使在进行相同类型和持续时间的运动时,肌肉电刺激也可以促进能量代谢的增加,特别是在无氧能量系统中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acute effects of electrical muscle stimulation on energy metabolism during weight-bearing exercise in young-female: a crossover randomized controlled trial.

Background: Electrical muscle stimulation is an effective tool that provides additional benefits to energy metabolism, such as energy expenditure. However, it remains unclear which energy system influences the increase in energy expenditure during electrical muscle stimulation. The aim of this study was to determine the contribution of three energy systems (aerobic, anaerobic lactic, and anaerobic alactic) during a single session of weight-bearing exercise with EMS using a crossover randomized controlled trial.

Methods: Ten young females (mean age: 23.0±3.6 years) were randomly assigned to perform two types of exercises in a random order (WB: weight-bearing exercises without electrical muscle stimulation, N.=10; WB+EMS: weight-bearing exercises with electrical muscle stimulation, N.=10). During both sessions, we evaluated the oxygen consumption (absolute and relative), blood lactate concentration (before and after exercise), and heart rate. We then calculated the energy expenditure and percentage for the three energy systems.

Results: WB+EMS showed significantly higher oxygen consumption (P=0.016, effect size; d=0.94) than WB. The total energy expenditure was 25.7% higher in WB+EMS than in WB (84.4±17.1 vs. 67.1±15.4 kcal, P=0.045, d=0.74). In addition, the energy expenditure of the anaerobic lactic system was significantly higher in the WB+EMS (P=0.009, d=1.06).

Conclusions: These findings suggest that electrical muscle stimulation can contribute to an increased energy metabolism, particularly in the anaerobic energy system, even when performing the same type and duration of exercise.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
393
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness publishes scientific papers relating to the area of the applied physiology, preventive medicine, sports medicine and traumatology, sports psychology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信