经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的程序管理和死亡率与社会经济地位(SES)的关系:一项来自泛伦敦PCI (BCIS)注册中心的观察性研究。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Krishnaraj S Rathod, Pitt Lim, Sam Firoozi, Richard Bogle, Ajay K Jain, Philip A MacCarthy, Miles C Dalby, Iqbal S Malik, Anthony Mathur, James Spratt, Ranil De Silva, Roby Rakhit, Jonathan Hill, Sundeep Singh Kalra, Simon Redwood, Richard Andrew Archbold, Andrew Wragg, Daniel A Jones
{"title":"经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的程序管理和死亡率与社会经济地位(SES)的关系:一项来自泛伦敦PCI (BCIS)注册中心的观察性研究。","authors":"Krishnaraj S Rathod, Pitt Lim, Sam Firoozi, Richard Bogle, Ajay K Jain, Philip A MacCarthy, Miles C Dalby, Iqbal S Malik, Anthony Mathur, James Spratt, Ranil De Silva, Roby Rakhit, Jonathan Hill, Sundeep Singh Kalra, Simon Redwood, Richard Andrew Archbold, Andrew Wragg, Daniel A Jones","doi":"10.3390/jcdd12030096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lower socioeconomic status (SES) has been associated with increased mortality from coronary heart disease. This excess risk, relative to affluent patients, may be due to a combination of more adverse cardiovascular-risk factors, inequalities in access to cardiac investigations, longer waiting times for cardiac revascularisation and lower use of secondary prevention drugs. We sought to investigate whether socio-economic status influenced long-term all-cause mortality after PCI in a large metropolitan city (London), which serves a population of 11 million people with a mixed social background over a 10-year period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an observational cohort study of 123,780 consecutive PCI procedures from the Pan-London (United Kingdom) PCI registry. This data set is collected prospectively and includes all patients treated between January 2005 and December 2015. The database includes PCI performed for stable angina and ACS (ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and unstable angina). Patient socio-economic status was defined by the English Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) score, according to residential postcode. Patients were analysed by quintile of IMD score (Q1, least deprived; Q5, most deprived). Median follow-up was 3.7 (IQR: 2.0-5.1) years and the primary outcome was all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients was 64.3 ± 12.1 years and 25.2% were female. A total of 22.4% of patients were diabetic and 27.3% had a history of previous myocardial infarction. The rates of long-term all-cause mortality increased progressively across quintiles of IMD score, with patients in Q5 showing significantly higher long-term mortality rates compared with patients in Q1 (<i>p</i> = 0.0044). This persisted following the inclusion of a propensity score in the proportional hazard model as a covariate (HR for Q5 compared to Q1: 1.15 [95% CI: 1.10-1.42]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study has demonstrated that low SES is an independent predictor of adverse clinical outcomes following PCI in the large, diverse metropolitan city of London. There clearly are inequalities in cardio-vascular risk factors, time to access to medical treatment/PCI, access to complex imaging and devices during PCI, access to secondary prevention after PCI, and even race differences. Hence, attention to reducing the burden of cardiovascular risk factors and improving primary prevention, particularly in patients with lower SES, is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":15197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11943075/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Association of Socioeconomic Status (SES) with Procedural Management and Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI): An Observational Study from the Pan-London PCI (BCIS) Registry.\",\"authors\":\"Krishnaraj S Rathod, Pitt Lim, Sam Firoozi, Richard Bogle, Ajay K Jain, Philip A MacCarthy, Miles C Dalby, Iqbal S Malik, Anthony Mathur, James Spratt, Ranil De Silva, Roby Rakhit, Jonathan Hill, Sundeep Singh Kalra, Simon Redwood, Richard Andrew Archbold, Andrew Wragg, Daniel A Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcdd12030096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lower socioeconomic status (SES) has been associated with increased mortality from coronary heart disease. This excess risk, relative to affluent patients, may be due to a combination of more adverse cardiovascular-risk factors, inequalities in access to cardiac investigations, longer waiting times for cardiac revascularisation and lower use of secondary prevention drugs. We sought to investigate whether socio-economic status influenced long-term all-cause mortality after PCI in a large metropolitan city (London), which serves a population of 11 million people with a mixed social background over a 10-year period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an observational cohort study of 123,780 consecutive PCI procedures from the Pan-London (United Kingdom) PCI registry. This data set is collected prospectively and includes all patients treated between January 2005 and December 2015. The database includes PCI performed for stable angina and ACS (ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and unstable angina). Patient socio-economic status was defined by the English Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) score, according to residential postcode. Patients were analysed by quintile of IMD score (Q1, least deprived; Q5, most deprived). Median follow-up was 3.7 (IQR: 2.0-5.1) years and the primary outcome was all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients was 64.3 ± 12.1 years and 25.2% were female. A total of 22.4% of patients were diabetic and 27.3% had a history of previous myocardial infarction. The rates of long-term all-cause mortality increased progressively across quintiles of IMD score, with patients in Q5 showing significantly higher long-term mortality rates compared with patients in Q1 (<i>p</i> = 0.0044). This persisted following the inclusion of a propensity score in the proportional hazard model as a covariate (HR for Q5 compared to Q1: 1.15 [95% CI: 1.10-1.42]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study has demonstrated that low SES is an independent predictor of adverse clinical outcomes following PCI in the large, diverse metropolitan city of London. There clearly are inequalities in cardio-vascular risk factors, time to access to medical treatment/PCI, access to complex imaging and devices during PCI, access to secondary prevention after PCI, and even race differences. Hence, attention to reducing the burden of cardiovascular risk factors and improving primary prevention, particularly in patients with lower SES, is required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11943075/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12030096\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12030096","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:较低的社会经济地位(SES)与冠心病死亡率增加有关。与富裕患者相比,这种过度风险可能是由于心血管不良风险因素较多、获得心脏检查的机会不平等、心脏血管重建等待时间较长以及二级预防药物的使用较低等因素共同造成的。我们试图调查一个大城市(伦敦)的社会经济地位是否影响PCI术后的长期全因死亡率,该城市在10年期间为1100万具有混合社会背景的人口提供服务。方法:我们对来自英国泛伦敦PCI注册中心的123780例连续PCI手术进行了观察性队列研究。该数据集是前瞻性收集的,包括2005年1月至2015年12月期间接受治疗的所有患者。该数据库包括为稳定型心绞痛和ACS (st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)、非st段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)和不稳定型心绞痛)实施的PCI。患者的社会经济地位由多重剥夺英语指数(IMD)评分来定义,根据居住的邮政编码。对患者进行IMD评分五分位数分析(Q1,最少剥夺;Q5,最贫困)。中位随访时间为3.7年(IQR: 2.0-5.1),主要结局为全因死亡率。结果:患者平均年龄64.3±12.1岁,女性占25.2%。22.4%的患者患有糖尿病,27.3%的患者既往有心肌梗死史。长期全因死亡率在IMD评分的五分位数中逐渐增加,Q5患者的长期死亡率明显高于Q1患者(p = 0.0044)。在比例风险模型中纳入倾向评分作为协变量后,这种情况仍然存在(Q5与Q1的HR: 1.15 [95% CI: 1.10-1.42])。结论:本研究表明,低社会经济地位是伦敦大城市PCI术后不良临床结果的独立预测因子。显然,在心血管危险因素、获得医疗/PCI的时间、PCI期间获得复杂成像和设备的机会、PCI后获得二级预防的机会、甚至种族差异方面都存在不平等。因此,需要注意减轻心血管危险因素的负担和改善初级预防,特别是在SES较低的患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Association of Socioeconomic Status (SES) with Procedural Management and Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI): An Observational Study from the Pan-London PCI (BCIS) Registry.

Background: Lower socioeconomic status (SES) has been associated with increased mortality from coronary heart disease. This excess risk, relative to affluent patients, may be due to a combination of more adverse cardiovascular-risk factors, inequalities in access to cardiac investigations, longer waiting times for cardiac revascularisation and lower use of secondary prevention drugs. We sought to investigate whether socio-economic status influenced long-term all-cause mortality after PCI in a large metropolitan city (London), which serves a population of 11 million people with a mixed social background over a 10-year period.

Methods: We conducted an observational cohort study of 123,780 consecutive PCI procedures from the Pan-London (United Kingdom) PCI registry. This data set is collected prospectively and includes all patients treated between January 2005 and December 2015. The database includes PCI performed for stable angina and ACS (ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and unstable angina). Patient socio-economic status was defined by the English Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) score, according to residential postcode. Patients were analysed by quintile of IMD score (Q1, least deprived; Q5, most deprived). Median follow-up was 3.7 (IQR: 2.0-5.1) years and the primary outcome was all-cause mortality.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 64.3 ± 12.1 years and 25.2% were female. A total of 22.4% of patients were diabetic and 27.3% had a history of previous myocardial infarction. The rates of long-term all-cause mortality increased progressively across quintiles of IMD score, with patients in Q5 showing significantly higher long-term mortality rates compared with patients in Q1 (p = 0.0044). This persisted following the inclusion of a propensity score in the proportional hazard model as a covariate (HR for Q5 compared to Q1: 1.15 [95% CI: 1.10-1.42]).

Conclusions: This study has demonstrated that low SES is an independent predictor of adverse clinical outcomes following PCI in the large, diverse metropolitan city of London. There clearly are inequalities in cardio-vascular risk factors, time to access to medical treatment/PCI, access to complex imaging and devices during PCI, access to secondary prevention after PCI, and even race differences. Hence, attention to reducing the burden of cardiovascular risk factors and improving primary prevention, particularly in patients with lower SES, is required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
381
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信