Li Zhou, Milton Jose Barros E Silva, Edward Hsiao, Zeynep Eroglu, Shahneen Sandhu, Igor Samoylenko, Serigne N Lo, Matteo S Carlino, George Au-Yeung, Maria Gonzalez, Andrew J Spillane, Thomas E Pennington, Kerwin F Shannon, Rony Kapoor, Elizabeth M Burton, Hussein A Tawbi, Rodabe N Amaria, Christian U Blank, João Pedreira Duprat, Rafaela Brito de Paula, David E Gyorki, Robyn P M Saw, Sydney Ch'Ng, Robert V Rawson, Richard A Scolyer, Ines Pires da Silva, Alexander C J van Akkooi, Georgina V Long, Alexander M Menzies
{"title":"FDG-PET与黑色素瘤新辅助免疫治疗的病理反应和生存相关。","authors":"Li Zhou, Milton Jose Barros E Silva, Edward Hsiao, Zeynep Eroglu, Shahneen Sandhu, Igor Samoylenko, Serigne N Lo, Matteo S Carlino, George Au-Yeung, Maria Gonzalez, Andrew J Spillane, Thomas E Pennington, Kerwin F Shannon, Rony Kapoor, Elizabeth M Burton, Hussein A Tawbi, Rodabe N Amaria, Christian U Blank, João Pedreira Duprat, Rafaela Brito de Paula, David E Gyorki, Robyn P M Saw, Sydney Ch'Ng, Robert V Rawson, Richard A Scolyer, Ines Pires da Silva, Alexander C J van Akkooi, Georgina V Long, Alexander M Menzies","doi":"10.1136/jitc-2025-011483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has become the new standard of care for stage III melanoma. This study sought to describe the metabolic changes seen with fludeoxyglucose-18-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) following neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with melanoma and explore associations with pathological response and recurrence-free survival (RFS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from patients with macroscopic stage III nodal melanoma treated with neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibitor therapy were pooled from five melanoma centers. All patients underwent baseline and preoperative FDG-PET and CT assessments, and all had surgery. Pathological response was determined using the International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium criteria, radiological response using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, and FDG-PET response using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria. The primary endpoint was to explore the associations of metabolic and radiological responses with pathological response; secondary endpoints were RFS outcomes stratified by each response category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>115 patients were included, 69% male, median age 59 years (27-92), 43% BRAF mutant, and median follow-up was 22.2 months (95% CI 13.7 to 26.4). 40 patients received anti-PD-1 monotherapy, 20 patients received pembrolizumab combined with lenvatinib, and 55 patients received ipilimumab and nivolumab. The major pathological response (MPR) rate was 62%, and the pathological complete response rate was 51%. RECIST response underestimated pathological response; patients achieving RECIST stable disease (38%) had a 50% chance of achieving MPR. The FDG-PET metabolic response rate was 73%, with most achieving an MPR (80%), especially in patients with a complete metabolic response (CMR, 96% MPR). A small proportion of patients (10%) had stable metabolic disease on FDG-PET, and all these patients were non-MPR. Patients with progressive metabolic disease were also in the majority non-MPR (79%). Patients with MPR, complete response/partial response on CT, and CMR/partial metabolic response on FDG-PET had a favorable 24-month RFS (95.6%, 97.3%, and 93.7%, respectively), with FDG-PET able to identify a greater proportion of patients with favorable progression-free survival (PFS) than pathology or CT (73%, 62%, and 43%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has high FDG-PET response rates in melanoma. FDG-PET response associates with pathological response and confers impressive RFS, suggesting this could be an important clinical tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":14820,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938238/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FDG-PET associations with pathological response and survival with neoadjuvant immunotherapy for melanoma.\",\"authors\":\"Li Zhou, Milton Jose Barros E Silva, Edward Hsiao, Zeynep Eroglu, Shahneen Sandhu, Igor Samoylenko, Serigne N Lo, Matteo S Carlino, George Au-Yeung, Maria Gonzalez, Andrew J Spillane, Thomas E Pennington, Kerwin F Shannon, Rony Kapoor, Elizabeth M Burton, Hussein A Tawbi, Rodabe N Amaria, Christian U Blank, João Pedreira Duprat, Rafaela Brito de Paula, David E Gyorki, Robyn P M Saw, Sydney Ch'Ng, Robert V Rawson, Richard A Scolyer, Ines Pires da Silva, Alexander C J van Akkooi, Georgina V Long, Alexander M Menzies\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jitc-2025-011483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has become the new standard of care for stage III melanoma. This study sought to describe the metabolic changes seen with fludeoxyglucose-18-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) following neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with melanoma and explore associations with pathological response and recurrence-free survival (RFS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from patients with macroscopic stage III nodal melanoma treated with neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibitor therapy were pooled from five melanoma centers. All patients underwent baseline and preoperative FDG-PET and CT assessments, and all had surgery. Pathological response was determined using the International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium criteria, radiological response using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, and FDG-PET response using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria. The primary endpoint was to explore the associations of metabolic and radiological responses with pathological response; secondary endpoints were RFS outcomes stratified by each response category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>115 patients were included, 69% male, median age 59 years (27-92), 43% BRAF mutant, and median follow-up was 22.2 months (95% CI 13.7 to 26.4). 40 patients received anti-PD-1 monotherapy, 20 patients received pembrolizumab combined with lenvatinib, and 55 patients received ipilimumab and nivolumab. The major pathological response (MPR) rate was 62%, and the pathological complete response rate was 51%. RECIST response underestimated pathological response; patients achieving RECIST stable disease (38%) had a 50% chance of achieving MPR. The FDG-PET metabolic response rate was 73%, with most achieving an MPR (80%), especially in patients with a complete metabolic response (CMR, 96% MPR). A small proportion of patients (10%) had stable metabolic disease on FDG-PET, and all these patients were non-MPR. Patients with progressive metabolic disease were also in the majority non-MPR (79%). Patients with MPR, complete response/partial response on CT, and CMR/partial metabolic response on FDG-PET had a favorable 24-month RFS (95.6%, 97.3%, and 93.7%, respectively), with FDG-PET able to identify a greater proportion of patients with favorable progression-free survival (PFS) than pathology or CT (73%, 62%, and 43%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has high FDG-PET response rates in melanoma. FDG-PET response associates with pathological response and confers impressive RFS, suggesting this could be an important clinical tool.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938238/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2025-011483\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2025-011483","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:新辅助免疫治疗已成为III期黑色素瘤治疗的新标准。本研究旨在描述黑色素瘤患者在新辅助免疫治疗后用氟脱氧葡萄糖-18正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET)观察到的代谢变化,并探讨其与病理反应和无复发生存期(RFS)的关系。方法:从5个黑色素瘤中心收集了接受新辅助检查点抑制剂治疗的宏观III期淋巴结黑色素瘤患者的数据。所有患者均进行了基线和术前FDG-PET和CT评估,并均进行了手术。病理反应采用国际新辅助黑色素瘤联盟标准,放射反应采用实体瘤反应评价标准(RECIST)标准,FDG-PET反应采用欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织(EORTC)标准。主要目的是探讨代谢和放射反应与病理反应的关系;次要终点是按每个反应类别分层的RFS结果。结果:纳入115例患者,69%为男性,中位年龄59岁(27-92岁),43%为BRAF突变体,中位随访时间为22.2个月(95% CI 13.7 ~ 26.4)。40例患者接受抗pd -1单药治疗,20例患者接受派姆单抗联合lenvatinib治疗,55例患者接受伊匹单抗和纳武单抗治疗。主要病理缓解率(MPR)为62%,病理完全缓解率为51%。RECIST反应低估病理反应;达到RECIST稳定病情的患者(38%)有50%的机会达到MPR。FDG-PET代谢缓解率为73%,大多数达到MPR(80%),特别是完全代谢缓解的患者(CMR, 96% MPR)。一小部分患者(10%)FDG-PET为稳定代谢性疾病,这些患者均为非mpr。进行性代谢性疾病患者也以非mpr为主(79%)。FDG-PET显示MPR、CT完全缓解/部分缓解和CMR/部分代谢缓解的患者有良好的24个月RFS(分别为95.6%、97.3%和93.7%),与病理或CT相比,FDG-PET能够识别更大比例的无进展生存(PFS)患者(分别为73%、62%和43%)。结论:新辅助免疫治疗对黑色素瘤有较高的FDG-PET应答率。FDG-PET反应与病理反应相关,并提供令人印象深刻的RFS,这表明它可能是重要的临床工具。
FDG-PET associations with pathological response and survival with neoadjuvant immunotherapy for melanoma.
Background: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has become the new standard of care for stage III melanoma. This study sought to describe the metabolic changes seen with fludeoxyglucose-18-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) following neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with melanoma and explore associations with pathological response and recurrence-free survival (RFS).
Methods: Data from patients with macroscopic stage III nodal melanoma treated with neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibitor therapy were pooled from five melanoma centers. All patients underwent baseline and preoperative FDG-PET and CT assessments, and all had surgery. Pathological response was determined using the International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium criteria, radiological response using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, and FDG-PET response using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria. The primary endpoint was to explore the associations of metabolic and radiological responses with pathological response; secondary endpoints were RFS outcomes stratified by each response category.
Results: 115 patients were included, 69% male, median age 59 years (27-92), 43% BRAF mutant, and median follow-up was 22.2 months (95% CI 13.7 to 26.4). 40 patients received anti-PD-1 monotherapy, 20 patients received pembrolizumab combined with lenvatinib, and 55 patients received ipilimumab and nivolumab. The major pathological response (MPR) rate was 62%, and the pathological complete response rate was 51%. RECIST response underestimated pathological response; patients achieving RECIST stable disease (38%) had a 50% chance of achieving MPR. The FDG-PET metabolic response rate was 73%, with most achieving an MPR (80%), especially in patients with a complete metabolic response (CMR, 96% MPR). A small proportion of patients (10%) had stable metabolic disease on FDG-PET, and all these patients were non-MPR. Patients with progressive metabolic disease were also in the majority non-MPR (79%). Patients with MPR, complete response/partial response on CT, and CMR/partial metabolic response on FDG-PET had a favorable 24-month RFS (95.6%, 97.3%, and 93.7%, respectively), with FDG-PET able to identify a greater proportion of patients with favorable progression-free survival (PFS) than pathology or CT (73%, 62%, and 43%, respectively).
Conclusion: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has high FDG-PET response rates in melanoma. FDG-PET response associates with pathological response and confers impressive RFS, suggesting this could be an important clinical tool.
期刊介绍:
The Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (JITC) is a peer-reviewed publication that promotes scientific exchange and deepens knowledge in the constantly evolving fields of tumor immunology and cancer immunotherapy. With an open access format, JITC encourages widespread access to its findings. The journal covers a wide range of topics, spanning from basic science to translational and clinical research. Key areas of interest include tumor-host interactions, the intricate tumor microenvironment, animal models, the identification of predictive and prognostic immune biomarkers, groundbreaking pharmaceutical and cellular therapies, innovative vaccines, combination immune-based treatments, and the study of immune-related toxicity.