围手术期青霉素和头孢菌素类抗生素过敏评估和检测:prep试点随机临床试验。

IF 15.7 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Joseph Francis De Luca, Sara Vogrin, Natasha Elizabeth Holmes, Gemma Kate Reynolds, Jamie Lee Waldron, Fionnuala Cox, Justin Nazareth, Ranjan Guha, Ned Douglas, Andrew Hardidge, Trisha Nicole Peel, Jo Anne Douglass, Douglas Forsyth Johnson, Jason Anthony Trubiano
{"title":"围手术期青霉素和头孢菌素类抗生素过敏评估和检测:prep试点随机临床试验。","authors":"Joseph Francis De Luca, Sara Vogrin, Natasha Elizabeth Holmes, Gemma Kate Reynolds, Jamie Lee Waldron, Fionnuala Cox, Justin Nazareth, Ranjan Guha, Ned Douglas, Andrew Hardidge, Trisha Nicole Peel, Jo Anne Douglass, Douglas Forsyth Johnson, Jason Anthony Trubiano","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2025.0279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Antibiotic allergy labels (AALs) impact patient health and perioperative outcomes. Antibiotic allergy delabeling could improve antibiotic prescribing and infection-related outcomes perioperatively.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the feasibility and safety of antibiotic allergy assessment and delabeling in anesthesiologist-led preoperative assessment clinics and expand delabeling efforts outside of specialist allergy clinics.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This randomized clinical trial was a multicenter, phase 2 feasibility and safety trial conducted between December 14, 2020, and October 31, 2023, at outpatient preoperative anesthesiologist-led clinics at 3 tertiary hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. Participants were adults (age ≥18 years) with a reported β-lactam AAL likely to require intravenous antibiotic therapy for perioperative prophylaxis. Randomization was carried out on a 1:1 basis.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Enhanced allergy assessment by anesthesiologists using a smartphone application with a decision support algorithm adapted from a validated antibiotic allergy assessment tool. Risk scores guided antibiotic allergy testing: direct oral challenge (low risk) or skin testing followed by oral challenge (medium to high risk).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The 2 primary feasibility outcomes were the proportion of patients randomized to intervention who received intervention per protocol and proportion of patients consenting to participate out of all eligible. The primary safety outcome was the proportion of the intervention group experiencing an antibiotic-associated adverse event (AE) within 90 days postsurgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 150 patients enrolled, 74 were randomly assigned to receive the intervention and 76 to control. The median age was 67 years (range, 28-89 years); 78 (52%) were female and 72 (48%) were male. For feasibility of recruitment, 150 of 511 patients (29.4%; 95% CI, 25.4%-33.5%) with eligible AALs were enrolled. For feasibility of intervention delivery, 47 of 74 patients (63.5%; 95% CI, 51.5%-74.4%) randomized to intervention had allergy testing; 28 of 30 patients (93%) assessed as low risk and 19 of 44 patients (43%) assessed as moderate/high risk proceeded to allergy testing. Antibiotic-related AE were reported in 4 of 74 intervention patients (5.4%, 95% CI, 1.5%-13.3%), 1 event was immune mediated (benign rash) without a delay to surgery. There was less restricted antibiotic use in the intervention group (6 patients; 10.7%) compared with the control group (10 patients; 17.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Low-risk β-lactam AAL were successfully evaluated and delabeled by anesthesiologists in the preoperative clinic using the intervention. The absence of severe AE after the intervention provides reassurance that antibiotic allergy delabeling can be achieved as part of a preoperative workup without delaying surgery and may improve the choice of preferred β-lactam prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12620001295932.</p>","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11947964/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perioperative Penicillin and Cephalosporin Antibiotic Allergy Assessment and Testing: The PREPARE Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Francis De Luca, Sara Vogrin, Natasha Elizabeth Holmes, Gemma Kate Reynolds, Jamie Lee Waldron, Fionnuala Cox, Justin Nazareth, Ranjan Guha, Ned Douglas, Andrew Hardidge, Trisha Nicole Peel, Jo Anne Douglass, Douglas Forsyth Johnson, Jason Anthony Trubiano\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamasurg.2025.0279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Antibiotic allergy labels (AALs) impact patient health and perioperative outcomes. Antibiotic allergy delabeling could improve antibiotic prescribing and infection-related outcomes perioperatively.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the feasibility and safety of antibiotic allergy assessment and delabeling in anesthesiologist-led preoperative assessment clinics and expand delabeling efforts outside of specialist allergy clinics.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This randomized clinical trial was a multicenter, phase 2 feasibility and safety trial conducted between December 14, 2020, and October 31, 2023, at outpatient preoperative anesthesiologist-led clinics at 3 tertiary hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. Participants were adults (age ≥18 years) with a reported β-lactam AAL likely to require intravenous antibiotic therapy for perioperative prophylaxis. Randomization was carried out on a 1:1 basis.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Enhanced allergy assessment by anesthesiologists using a smartphone application with a decision support algorithm adapted from a validated antibiotic allergy assessment tool. Risk scores guided antibiotic allergy testing: direct oral challenge (low risk) or skin testing followed by oral challenge (medium to high risk).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The 2 primary feasibility outcomes were the proportion of patients randomized to intervention who received intervention per protocol and proportion of patients consenting to participate out of all eligible. The primary safety outcome was the proportion of the intervention group experiencing an antibiotic-associated adverse event (AE) within 90 days postsurgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 150 patients enrolled, 74 were randomly assigned to receive the intervention and 76 to control. The median age was 67 years (range, 28-89 years); 78 (52%) were female and 72 (48%) were male. For feasibility of recruitment, 150 of 511 patients (29.4%; 95% CI, 25.4%-33.5%) with eligible AALs were enrolled. For feasibility of intervention delivery, 47 of 74 patients (63.5%; 95% CI, 51.5%-74.4%) randomized to intervention had allergy testing; 28 of 30 patients (93%) assessed as low risk and 19 of 44 patients (43%) assessed as moderate/high risk proceeded to allergy testing. Antibiotic-related AE were reported in 4 of 74 intervention patients (5.4%, 95% CI, 1.5%-13.3%), 1 event was immune mediated (benign rash) without a delay to surgery. There was less restricted antibiotic use in the intervention group (6 patients; 10.7%) compared with the control group (10 patients; 17.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Low-risk β-lactam AAL were successfully evaluated and delabeled by anesthesiologists in the preoperative clinic using the intervention. The absence of severe AE after the intervention provides reassurance that antibiotic allergy delabeling can be achieved as part of a preoperative workup without delaying surgery and may improve the choice of preferred β-lactam prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12620001295932.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11947964/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2025.0279\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2025.0279","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:抗生素过敏标签(AALs)影响患者健康和围手术期结果。抗生素过敏去标签化可以改善抗生素处方和围手术期感染相关的预后。目的:评估麻醉医师主导的术前评估诊所进行抗生素过敏评估和去标签的可行性和安全性,并将去标签工作扩大到专科过敏诊所之外。设计、环境和参与者:该随机临床试验是一项多中心、2期可行性和安全性试验,于2020年12月14日至2023年10月31日在澳大利亚墨尔本3家三级医院的门诊术前麻醉师领导的诊所进行。参与者为成人(年龄≥18岁),报告β-内酰胺AAL可能需要静脉抗生素治疗围手术期预防。按1:1的比例进行随机分组。干预措施:麻醉师使用智能手机应用程序,采用经过验证的抗生素过敏评估工具改编的决策支持算法,增强过敏评估。风险评分指导抗生素过敏试验:直接口服刺激(低风险)或皮肤试验,然后口服刺激(中高风险)。主要结局和指标:2个主要可行性结局为随机分组干预的患者按方案接受干预的比例和在所有符合条件的患者中同意参与的比例。主要安全性指标是干预组术后90天内发生抗生素相关不良事件(AE)的比例。结果:纳入的150例患者中,74例随机分配为干预组,76例为对照组。中位年龄为67岁(范围28-89岁);女性78例(52%),男性72例(48%)。在招募可行性方面,511例患者中有150例(29.4%;95% CI, 25.4%-33.5%)纳入符合AALs的患者。74例患者中47例(63.5%;95% CI, 51.5%-74.4%)随机分配到干预组进行过敏试验;评估为低风险的30例患者中有28例(93%)和评估为中度/高风险的44例患者中有19例(43%)进行了过敏测试。74例干预患者中有4例报告了抗生素相关AE (5.4%, 95% CI, 1.5%-13.3%), 1例事件是免疫介导的(良性皮疹),没有延迟手术。干预组限制抗生素使用较少(6例;10.7%)与对照组(10例;17.9%)。结论及意义:低风险β-内酰胺AAL在术前临床应用干预成功地被麻醉医师评估和去标签。干预后没有出现严重的AE,这保证了抗生素过敏去除标签可以作为术前检查的一部分,而不会延迟手术,并可能改善首选β-内酰胺预防的选择。试验注册:anzctr.org.au标识符:ACTRN12620001295932。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perioperative Penicillin and Cephalosporin Antibiotic Allergy Assessment and Testing: The PREPARE Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Antibiotic allergy labels (AALs) impact patient health and perioperative outcomes. Antibiotic allergy delabeling could improve antibiotic prescribing and infection-related outcomes perioperatively.

Objective: To assess the feasibility and safety of antibiotic allergy assessment and delabeling in anesthesiologist-led preoperative assessment clinics and expand delabeling efforts outside of specialist allergy clinics.

Design, setting, and participants: This randomized clinical trial was a multicenter, phase 2 feasibility and safety trial conducted between December 14, 2020, and October 31, 2023, at outpatient preoperative anesthesiologist-led clinics at 3 tertiary hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. Participants were adults (age ≥18 years) with a reported β-lactam AAL likely to require intravenous antibiotic therapy for perioperative prophylaxis. Randomization was carried out on a 1:1 basis.

Interventions: Enhanced allergy assessment by anesthesiologists using a smartphone application with a decision support algorithm adapted from a validated antibiotic allergy assessment tool. Risk scores guided antibiotic allergy testing: direct oral challenge (low risk) or skin testing followed by oral challenge (medium to high risk).

Main outcomes and measures: The 2 primary feasibility outcomes were the proportion of patients randomized to intervention who received intervention per protocol and proportion of patients consenting to participate out of all eligible. The primary safety outcome was the proportion of the intervention group experiencing an antibiotic-associated adverse event (AE) within 90 days postsurgery.

Results: Of 150 patients enrolled, 74 were randomly assigned to receive the intervention and 76 to control. The median age was 67 years (range, 28-89 years); 78 (52%) were female and 72 (48%) were male. For feasibility of recruitment, 150 of 511 patients (29.4%; 95% CI, 25.4%-33.5%) with eligible AALs were enrolled. For feasibility of intervention delivery, 47 of 74 patients (63.5%; 95% CI, 51.5%-74.4%) randomized to intervention had allergy testing; 28 of 30 patients (93%) assessed as low risk and 19 of 44 patients (43%) assessed as moderate/high risk proceeded to allergy testing. Antibiotic-related AE were reported in 4 of 74 intervention patients (5.4%, 95% CI, 1.5%-13.3%), 1 event was immune mediated (benign rash) without a delay to surgery. There was less restricted antibiotic use in the intervention group (6 patients; 10.7%) compared with the control group (10 patients; 17.9%).

Conclusions and relevance: Low-risk β-lactam AAL were successfully evaluated and delabeled by anesthesiologists in the preoperative clinic using the intervention. The absence of severe AE after the intervention provides reassurance that antibiotic allergy delabeling can be achieved as part of a preoperative workup without delaying surgery and may improve the choice of preferred β-lactam prophylaxis.

Trial registration: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12620001295932.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA surgery
JAMA surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
400
期刊介绍: JAMA Surgery, an international peer-reviewed journal established in 1920, is the official publication of the Association of VA Surgeons, the Pacific Coast Surgical Association, and the Surgical Outcomes Club.It is a proud member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信