Olivia Metcalf, Karen E Lamb, David Forbes, Meaghan L O'Donnell, Tianchen Qian, Tracey Varker, Sean Cowlishaw, Sophie Zaloumis
{"title":"在受创伤影响的样本中使用生态瞬时评估和可穿戴的生理数据预测高愤怒强度。","authors":"Olivia Metcalf, Karen E Lamb, David Forbes, Meaghan L O'Donnell, Tianchen Qian, Tracey Varker, Sean Cowlishaw, Sophie Zaloumis","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2025.2472485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Digital technologies offer tremendous potential to predict dysregulated mood and behavior within an individual's environment, and in doing so can support the development of new digital health interventions. However, no prediction models have been built in trauma-exposed populations that leverage real-world data.<b>Objective:</b> This project aimed to determine if wearable-derived physiological data can predict anger intensity in trauma-exposed adults.<b>Method:</b> Heart rate variability (i.e. a commercial wearable stress score) was combined with ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data collected over 10 days (<i>n</i> = 84). Five summary measures from stress scores collected 10 min prior to each EMA were selected using factor analysis of 24 candidates.<b>Results:</b> A high area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was found for a logistic mixed effects model including these measures as predictors, ranging 0.761 (95% CI:0.569-0.921) to 0.899 (95% CI:0.784-0.980) across cross-validation methods.<b>Conclusions:</b> While the predictive performance may be overly optimistic due to the outcome prevalence (13.8%) and requires replication with larger datasets, our promising findings have significant methodological and clinical implications for researchers looking to build novel prediction and treatment approaches to respond to posttraumatic mental health.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"16 1","pages":"2472485"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948352/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting high anger intensity using ecological momentary assessment and wearable-derived physiological data in a trauma-affected sample.\",\"authors\":\"Olivia Metcalf, Karen E Lamb, David Forbes, Meaghan L O'Donnell, Tianchen Qian, Tracey Varker, Sean Cowlishaw, Sophie Zaloumis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20008066.2025.2472485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Digital technologies offer tremendous potential to predict dysregulated mood and behavior within an individual's environment, and in doing so can support the development of new digital health interventions. However, no prediction models have been built in trauma-exposed populations that leverage real-world data.<b>Objective:</b> This project aimed to determine if wearable-derived physiological data can predict anger intensity in trauma-exposed adults.<b>Method:</b> Heart rate variability (i.e. a commercial wearable stress score) was combined with ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data collected over 10 days (<i>n</i> = 84). Five summary measures from stress scores collected 10 min prior to each EMA were selected using factor analysis of 24 candidates.<b>Results:</b> A high area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was found for a logistic mixed effects model including these measures as predictors, ranging 0.761 (95% CI:0.569-0.921) to 0.899 (95% CI:0.784-0.980) across cross-validation methods.<b>Conclusions:</b> While the predictive performance may be overly optimistic due to the outcome prevalence (13.8%) and requires replication with larger datasets, our promising findings have significant methodological and clinical implications for researchers looking to build novel prediction and treatment approaches to respond to posttraumatic mental health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Psychotraumatology\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"2472485\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948352/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Psychotraumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2472485\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2472485","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predicting high anger intensity using ecological momentary assessment and wearable-derived physiological data in a trauma-affected sample.
Background: Digital technologies offer tremendous potential to predict dysregulated mood and behavior within an individual's environment, and in doing so can support the development of new digital health interventions. However, no prediction models have been built in trauma-exposed populations that leverage real-world data.Objective: This project aimed to determine if wearable-derived physiological data can predict anger intensity in trauma-exposed adults.Method: Heart rate variability (i.e. a commercial wearable stress score) was combined with ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data collected over 10 days (n = 84). Five summary measures from stress scores collected 10 min prior to each EMA were selected using factor analysis of 24 candidates.Results: A high area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was found for a logistic mixed effects model including these measures as predictors, ranging 0.761 (95% CI:0.569-0.921) to 0.899 (95% CI:0.784-0.980) across cross-validation methods.Conclusions: While the predictive performance may be overly optimistic due to the outcome prevalence (13.8%) and requires replication with larger datasets, our promising findings have significant methodological and clinical implications for researchers looking to build novel prediction and treatment approaches to respond to posttraumatic mental health.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.