人工智能在多大程度上可以帮助满足转移性乳腺癌患者的医疗需求:一项混合方法研究。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Yvonne W Leung, Jeremiah So, Avneet Sidhu, Veenaajaa Asokan, Mathew Gancarz, Vishrut Bharatkumar Gajjar, Ankita Patel, Janice M Li, Denis Kwok, Michelle B Nadler, Danielle Cuthbert, Philippe L Benard, Vikaash Kumar, Terry Cheng, Janet Papadakos, Tina Papadakos, Tran Truong, Mike Lovas, Jiahui Wong
{"title":"人工智能在多大程度上可以帮助满足转移性乳腺癌患者的医疗需求:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Yvonne W Leung, Jeremiah So, Avneet Sidhu, Veenaajaa Asokan, Mathew Gancarz, Vishrut Bharatkumar Gajjar, Ankita Patel, Janice M Li, Denis Kwok, Michelle B Nadler, Danielle Cuthbert, Philippe L Benard, Vikaash Kumar, Terry Cheng, Janet Papadakos, Tina Papadakos, Tran Truong, Mike Lovas, Jiahui Wong","doi":"10.3390/curroncol32030145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Artificial Intelligence Patient Librarian (AIPL) was designed to meet the psychosocial and supportive care needs of Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) patients with HR+/HER2- subtypes. AIPL provides conversational patient education, answers user questions, and offers tailored online resource recommendations. This study, conducted in three phases, assessed AIPL's impact on patients' ability to manage their advanced disease. In Phase 1, educational content was adapted for chatbot delivery, and over 100 credible online resources were annotated using a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to drive recommendations. Phase 2 involved 42 participants who completed pre- and post-surveys after using AIPL for two weeks. The surveys measured patient activation using the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) tool and evaluated user experience with the System Usability Scale (SUS). Phase 3 included focus groups to explore user experiences in depth. Of the 42 participants, 36 completed the study, with 10 participating in focus groups. Most participants were aged 40-64. PAM scores showed no significant differences between pre-survey (mean = 59.33, SD = 5.19) and post-survey (mean = 59.22, SD = 6.16), while SUS scores indicated good usability. Thematic analysis revealed four key themes: AIPL offers basic wellness and health guidance, provides limited support for managing relationships, offers limited condition-specific medical information, and is unable to offer hope to patients. Despite showing no impact on the PAM, possibly due to high baseline activation, AIPL demonstrated good usability and met basic information needs, particularly for newly diagnosed MBC patients. Future iterations will incorporate a large language model (LLM) to provide more comprehensive and personalized assistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"32 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11940934/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Extent to Which Artificial Intelligence Can Help Fulfill Metastatic Breast Cancer Patient Healthcare Needs: A Mixed-Methods Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yvonne W Leung, Jeremiah So, Avneet Sidhu, Veenaajaa Asokan, Mathew Gancarz, Vishrut Bharatkumar Gajjar, Ankita Patel, Janice M Li, Denis Kwok, Michelle B Nadler, Danielle Cuthbert, Philippe L Benard, Vikaash Kumar, Terry Cheng, Janet Papadakos, Tina Papadakos, Tran Truong, Mike Lovas, Jiahui Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol32030145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Artificial Intelligence Patient Librarian (AIPL) was designed to meet the psychosocial and supportive care needs of Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) patients with HR+/HER2- subtypes. AIPL provides conversational patient education, answers user questions, and offers tailored online resource recommendations. This study, conducted in three phases, assessed AIPL's impact on patients' ability to manage their advanced disease. In Phase 1, educational content was adapted for chatbot delivery, and over 100 credible online resources were annotated using a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to drive recommendations. Phase 2 involved 42 participants who completed pre- and post-surveys after using AIPL for two weeks. The surveys measured patient activation using the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) tool and evaluated user experience with the System Usability Scale (SUS). Phase 3 included focus groups to explore user experiences in depth. Of the 42 participants, 36 completed the study, with 10 participating in focus groups. Most participants were aged 40-64. PAM scores showed no significant differences between pre-survey (mean = 59.33, SD = 5.19) and post-survey (mean = 59.22, SD = 6.16), while SUS scores indicated good usability. Thematic analysis revealed four key themes: AIPL offers basic wellness and health guidance, provides limited support for managing relationships, offers limited condition-specific medical information, and is unable to offer hope to patients. Despite showing no impact on the PAM, possibly due to high baseline activation, AIPL demonstrated good usability and met basic information needs, particularly for newly diagnosed MBC patients. Future iterations will incorporate a large language model (LLM) to provide more comprehensive and personalized assistance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11940934/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32030145\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32030145","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能患者图书管理员(AIPL)旨在满足HR+/HER2-亚型转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者的社会心理和支持性护理需求。AIPL提供对话式患者教育,回答用户问题,并提供量身定制的在线资源建议。这项研究分三个阶段进行,评估了AIPL对患者管理晚期疾病能力的影响。在第一阶段,教育内容被改编为聊天机器人交付,使用卷积神经网络(CNN)对100多个可信的在线资源进行注释,以驱动推荐。第2阶段涉及42名参与者,他们在使用AIPL两周后完成了前后调查。调查使用患者激活测量(PAM)工具测量患者激活,并使用系统可用性量表(SUS)评估用户体验。第三阶段包括焦点小组来深入探索用户体验。在42名参与者中,有36人完成了研究,其中10人参加了焦点小组。大多数参与者的年龄在40-64岁之间。调查前(平均59.33分,SD = 5.19)和调查后(平均59.22分,SD = 6.16) PAM得分差异无统计学意义,SUS得分可用性较好。专题分析揭示了四个关键主题:AIPL提供基本的健康和保健指导,为管理关系提供有限的支持,提供有限的特定疾病的医疗信息,并且无法给病人带来希望。尽管显示对PAM没有影响,可能是由于高基线激活,但AIPL显示出良好的可用性并满足基本信息需求,特别是对于新诊断的MBC患者。未来的迭代将包含一个大型语言模型(LLM),以提供更全面和个性化的帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Extent to Which Artificial Intelligence Can Help Fulfill Metastatic Breast Cancer Patient Healthcare Needs: A Mixed-Methods Study.

The Artificial Intelligence Patient Librarian (AIPL) was designed to meet the psychosocial and supportive care needs of Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) patients with HR+/HER2- subtypes. AIPL provides conversational patient education, answers user questions, and offers tailored online resource recommendations. This study, conducted in three phases, assessed AIPL's impact on patients' ability to manage their advanced disease. In Phase 1, educational content was adapted for chatbot delivery, and over 100 credible online resources were annotated using a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to drive recommendations. Phase 2 involved 42 participants who completed pre- and post-surveys after using AIPL for two weeks. The surveys measured patient activation using the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) tool and evaluated user experience with the System Usability Scale (SUS). Phase 3 included focus groups to explore user experiences in depth. Of the 42 participants, 36 completed the study, with 10 participating in focus groups. Most participants were aged 40-64. PAM scores showed no significant differences between pre-survey (mean = 59.33, SD = 5.19) and post-survey (mean = 59.22, SD = 6.16), while SUS scores indicated good usability. Thematic analysis revealed four key themes: AIPL offers basic wellness and health guidance, provides limited support for managing relationships, offers limited condition-specific medical information, and is unable to offer hope to patients. Despite showing no impact on the PAM, possibly due to high baseline activation, AIPL demonstrated good usability and met basic information needs, particularly for newly diagnosed MBC patients. Future iterations will incorporate a large language model (LLM) to provide more comprehensive and personalized assistance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信