为个性化乳腺癌筛查提供多因素风险评估和沟通的障碍和促进因素:一项探索加拿大实施的定性研究。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Meghan J Walker, Anna Neely, Antonis C Antoniou, Mireille J M Broeders, Jennifer D Brooks, Tim Carver, Jocelyne Chiquette, Douglas F Easton, Andrea Eisen, Laurence Eloy, D Gareth R Evans, Samantha Fienberg, Yann Joly, Raymond H Kim, Bartha M Knoppers, Aisha K Lofters, Hermann Nabi, Nora Pashayan, Tracy L Stockley, Michel Dorval, Jacques Simard, Anna M Chiarelli
{"title":"为个性化乳腺癌筛查提供多因素风险评估和沟通的障碍和促进因素:一项探索加拿大实施的定性研究。","authors":"Meghan J Walker, Anna Neely, Antonis C Antoniou, Mireille J M Broeders, Jennifer D Brooks, Tim Carver, Jocelyne Chiquette, Douglas F Easton, Andrea Eisen, Laurence Eloy, D Gareth R Evans, Samantha Fienberg, Yann Joly, Raymond H Kim, Bartha M Knoppers, Aisha K Lofters, Hermann Nabi, Nora Pashayan, Tracy L Stockley, Michel Dorval, Jacques Simard, Anna M Chiarelli","doi":"10.3390/curroncol32030155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many jurisdictions are considering a shift to risk-stratified breast cancer screening; however, evidence on the feasibility of implementing it on a population scale is needed. We conducted a prospective cohort study in the PERSPECTIVE I&I project to produce evidence on risk-stratified breast screening and recruited 3753 participants to undergo multifactorial risk assessment from 2019-2021. This qualitative study explored the perspectives of study personnel on barriers and facilitators to delivering multifactorial risk assessment and risk communication. One focus group and three one-on-one interviews were conducted and a thematic analysis conducted which identified five themes: (1) barriers and facilitators to recruitment for multifactorial risk assessment, (2) barriers and facilitators to completion of the risk factor questionnaire, (3) additional resources required to implement multifactorial risk assessment, (4) the need for a person-centered approach, and (5) and risk literacy. While risk assessment and communication processes were successful overall, key barriers were identified including challenges with collecting comprehensive breast cancer risk factor information and limited resources to execute data collection and risk communication activities on a large scale. Risk assessment and communication processes will need to be optimized for large-scale implementation to ensure they are efficient but robust and person-centered.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"32 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11941251/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and Facilitators to Delivering Multifactorial Risk Assessment and Communication for Personalized Breast Cancer Screening: A Qualitative Study Exploring Implementation in Canada.\",\"authors\":\"Meghan J Walker, Anna Neely, Antonis C Antoniou, Mireille J M Broeders, Jennifer D Brooks, Tim Carver, Jocelyne Chiquette, Douglas F Easton, Andrea Eisen, Laurence Eloy, D Gareth R Evans, Samantha Fienberg, Yann Joly, Raymond H Kim, Bartha M Knoppers, Aisha K Lofters, Hermann Nabi, Nora Pashayan, Tracy L Stockley, Michel Dorval, Jacques Simard, Anna M Chiarelli\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol32030155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Many jurisdictions are considering a shift to risk-stratified breast cancer screening; however, evidence on the feasibility of implementing it on a population scale is needed. We conducted a prospective cohort study in the PERSPECTIVE I&I project to produce evidence on risk-stratified breast screening and recruited 3753 participants to undergo multifactorial risk assessment from 2019-2021. This qualitative study explored the perspectives of study personnel on barriers and facilitators to delivering multifactorial risk assessment and risk communication. One focus group and three one-on-one interviews were conducted and a thematic analysis conducted which identified five themes: (1) barriers and facilitators to recruitment for multifactorial risk assessment, (2) barriers and facilitators to completion of the risk factor questionnaire, (3) additional resources required to implement multifactorial risk assessment, (4) the need for a person-centered approach, and (5) and risk literacy. While risk assessment and communication processes were successful overall, key barriers were identified including challenges with collecting comprehensive breast cancer risk factor information and limited resources to execute data collection and risk communication activities on a large scale. Risk assessment and communication processes will need to be optimized for large-scale implementation to ensure they are efficient but robust and person-centered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11941251/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32030155\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32030155","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多辖区正在考虑转向风险分层乳腺癌筛查;然而,在人群范围内实施这种筛查的可行性还需要证据。我们在 PERSPECTIVE I&I 项目中开展了一项前瞻性队列研究,为风险分层乳腺癌筛查提供证据,并招募了 3753 名参与者在 2019-2021 年期间接受多因素风险评估。这项定性研究探讨了研究人员对提供多因素风险评估和风险沟通的障碍和促进因素的看法。研究人员进行了一次焦点小组讨论和三次一对一访谈,并进行了主题分析,确定了五个主题:(1)多因素风险评估招募的障碍和促进因素;(2)完成风险因素问卷的障碍和促进因素;(3)实施多因素风险评估所需的额外资源;(4)以人为本方法的必要性;以及(5)风险扫盲。虽然风险评估和交流过程总体上是成功的,但也发现了一些主要障碍,包括收集全面的乳腺癌风险因素信息所面临的挑战,以及大规模开展数据收集和风险交流活动所需的资源有限。在大规模实施时,需要对风险评估和交流流程进行优化,以确保其高效、稳健和以人为本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers and Facilitators to Delivering Multifactorial Risk Assessment and Communication for Personalized Breast Cancer Screening: A Qualitative Study Exploring Implementation in Canada.

Many jurisdictions are considering a shift to risk-stratified breast cancer screening; however, evidence on the feasibility of implementing it on a population scale is needed. We conducted a prospective cohort study in the PERSPECTIVE I&I project to produce evidence on risk-stratified breast screening and recruited 3753 participants to undergo multifactorial risk assessment from 2019-2021. This qualitative study explored the perspectives of study personnel on barriers and facilitators to delivering multifactorial risk assessment and risk communication. One focus group and three one-on-one interviews were conducted and a thematic analysis conducted which identified five themes: (1) barriers and facilitators to recruitment for multifactorial risk assessment, (2) barriers and facilitators to completion of the risk factor questionnaire, (3) additional resources required to implement multifactorial risk assessment, (4) the need for a person-centered approach, and (5) and risk literacy. While risk assessment and communication processes were successful overall, key barriers were identified including challenges with collecting comprehensive breast cancer risk factor information and limited resources to execute data collection and risk communication activities on a large scale. Risk assessment and communication processes will need to be optimized for large-scale implementation to ensure they are efficient but robust and person-centered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信