帕博西尼和利博西尼治疗晚期乳腺癌的实际疗效。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Tugay Avci, Mustafa Sahbazlar, Ferhat Ekinci, Atike Pinar Erdogan
{"title":"帕博西尼和利博西尼治疗晚期乳腺癌的实际疗效。","authors":"Tugay Avci, Mustafa Sahbazlar, Ferhat Ekinci, Atike Pinar Erdogan","doi":"10.3390/curroncol32030161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Clinical trials in metastatic hormone receptor-positive (HR+) human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative patients have shown that cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitors both increase response rates and provide survival benefits. The efficacy of these therapies needs to be supported by real-life data. In this study, we aimed to evaluate treatment response, survival and affecting factors in patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who were followed up with CDK 4/6 inhibitors in our center. <b>Materials and methods:</b> A retrospective analysis of 120 patients with HR+/HER2- MBC treated with ribociclib or palbociclib in combination with letrozole or fulvestrant was performed. <b>Results:</b> Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 24 months in the general population, 27 months in the ribociclib arm and 20 months in the palbociclib arm, with no significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) in both arms (<i>p</i> = 0.25). The mPFS was longer in the ribociclib + letrozole arm compared to palbociclib + letrozole (27 vs. 20 months, respectively). PFS was also longer in patients receiving ribociclib + fulvestrant compared to palbociclib + fulvestrant but not statistically significant (33 vs. 21 months, respectively). Median overall survival (mOS) was not reached, but 3-year overall survival (OS) was statistically significantly longer in the ribociclib arm (87% vs. 55.5%, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.03). <b>Conclusion</b>: Palbociclib and ribociclib are first-line treatment options for metastatic HR+/HER2- disease and have similar efficacy. In our study, while the mPFS was not statistically significant in both arms, the 3-year OS rate was higher in the ribociclib arm and statistically significant. Our findings were confirmed in randomized studies comparing both agents head-to-head.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"32 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11941151/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-Life Efficacy of Palbociclib and Ribociclib in Advanced Breast Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Tugay Avci, Mustafa Sahbazlar, Ferhat Ekinci, Atike Pinar Erdogan\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol32030161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Clinical trials in metastatic hormone receptor-positive (HR+) human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative patients have shown that cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitors both increase response rates and provide survival benefits. The efficacy of these therapies needs to be supported by real-life data. In this study, we aimed to evaluate treatment response, survival and affecting factors in patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who were followed up with CDK 4/6 inhibitors in our center. <b>Materials and methods:</b> A retrospective analysis of 120 patients with HR+/HER2- MBC treated with ribociclib or palbociclib in combination with letrozole or fulvestrant was performed. <b>Results:</b> Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 24 months in the general population, 27 months in the ribociclib arm and 20 months in the palbociclib arm, with no significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) in both arms (<i>p</i> = 0.25). The mPFS was longer in the ribociclib + letrozole arm compared to palbociclib + letrozole (27 vs. 20 months, respectively). PFS was also longer in patients receiving ribociclib + fulvestrant compared to palbociclib + fulvestrant but not statistically significant (33 vs. 21 months, respectively). Median overall survival (mOS) was not reached, but 3-year overall survival (OS) was statistically significantly longer in the ribociclib arm (87% vs. 55.5%, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.03). <b>Conclusion</b>: Palbociclib and ribociclib are first-line treatment options for metastatic HR+/HER2- disease and have similar efficacy. In our study, while the mPFS was not statistically significant in both arms, the 3-year OS rate was higher in the ribociclib arm and statistically significant. Our findings were confirmed in randomized studies comparing both agents head-to-head.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11941151/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32030161\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32030161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:针对转移性激素受体阳性(HR+)人类表皮生长因子受体-2(HER2)阴性患者的临床试验表明,细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6(CDK 4/6)抑制剂既能提高反应率,又能提高生存率。这些疗法的疗效需要得到实际数据的支持。在本研究中,我们旨在评估本中心接受CDK 4/6抑制剂随访的HR+/HER2-转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者的治疗反应、生存期和影响因素。材料与方法对120例接受ribociclib或palbociclib联合来曲唑或氟维司群治疗的HR+/HER2-转移性乳腺癌患者进行回顾性分析。结果显示普通人群的中位无进展生存期(mPFS)为24个月,ribociclib治疗组为27个月,palbociclib治疗组为20个月,两组的无进展生存期(PFS)无显著差异(p = 0.25)。与palbociclib+来曲唑治疗组相比,ribociclib+来曲唑治疗组的mPFS更长(分别为27个月和20个月)。与palbociclib+氟维司群相比,接受ribociclib+氟维司群治疗的患者的PFS也更长,但无统计学意义(分别为33个月和21个月)。未达到中位总生存期(mOS),但从统计学角度看,ribociclib治疗组的3年总生存期(OS)明显更长(分别为87%对55.5%,P = 0.03)。结论Palbociclib和ribociclib是转移性HR+/HER2-疾病的一线治疗方案,疗效相似。在我们的研究中,虽然两组的 mPFS 均无统计学意义,但利比奥克利组的 3 年 OS 率更高,且有统计学意义。我们的研究结果在对两种药物进行头对头比较的随机研究中得到了证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-Life Efficacy of Palbociclib and Ribociclib in Advanced Breast Cancer.

Background: Clinical trials in metastatic hormone receptor-positive (HR+) human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative patients have shown that cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitors both increase response rates and provide survival benefits. The efficacy of these therapies needs to be supported by real-life data. In this study, we aimed to evaluate treatment response, survival and affecting factors in patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who were followed up with CDK 4/6 inhibitors in our center. Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis of 120 patients with HR+/HER2- MBC treated with ribociclib or palbociclib in combination with letrozole or fulvestrant was performed. Results: Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 24 months in the general population, 27 months in the ribociclib arm and 20 months in the palbociclib arm, with no significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) in both arms (p = 0.25). The mPFS was longer in the ribociclib + letrozole arm compared to palbociclib + letrozole (27 vs. 20 months, respectively). PFS was also longer in patients receiving ribociclib + fulvestrant compared to palbociclib + fulvestrant but not statistically significant (33 vs. 21 months, respectively). Median overall survival (mOS) was not reached, but 3-year overall survival (OS) was statistically significantly longer in the ribociclib arm (87% vs. 55.5%, respectively, p = 0.03). Conclusion: Palbociclib and ribociclib are first-line treatment options for metastatic HR+/HER2- disease and have similar efficacy. In our study, while the mPFS was not statistically significant in both arms, the 3-year OS rate was higher in the ribociclib arm and statistically significant. Our findings were confirmed in randomized studies comparing both agents head-to-head.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信