在HR+/HER2-转移性乳腺癌患者中,Sacituzumab Govitecan与化疗的Q-TWiST分析

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Hope S Rugo, Aditya Bardia, Peter Schmid, Sara M Tolaney, Anandaroop Dasgupta, Ankita Kaushik, Wendy Verret, Marine Gosset, Adam Brufsky, Javier Cortés, Frederik Marmé
{"title":"在HR+/HER2-转移性乳腺癌患者中,Sacituzumab Govitecan与化疗的Q-TWiST分析","authors":"Hope S Rugo, Aditya Bardia, Peter Schmid, Sara M Tolaney, Anandaroop Dasgupta, Ankita Kaushik, Wendy Verret, Marine Gosset, Adam Brufsky, Javier Cortés, Frederik Marmé","doi":"10.3390/curroncol32030169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In TROPiCS-02, sacituzumab govitecan (SG) demonstrated significantly longer overall survival and progression-free survival with improved quality of life vs. chemotherapy treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC). The safety profile was consistent with previous studies of SG. We assessed the benefit--risk profile of SG vs. TPC by integrating patient preferences with clinical benefits using Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms of disease progression or Toxicity of treatment (Q-TWiST) analysis in this study population. Survival time was partitioned into three health states: TOX (grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs] after randomization/before disease progression), REL (disease progression until death or end of follow-up), and TWiST (time without progression or grade ≥3 TEAEs). Health state utility weights were obtained from the published literature. The established threshold for clinically important Q-TWiST gain is 10%. SG demonstrated significantly improved Q-TWiST vs. TPC (mean 9.7 vs. 8.1 months; difference 1.6 months; 95% CI, 0.5-2.7; <i>p</i> = 0.0067), which increased with longer follow-up. Relative Q-TWiST improvement met the threshold for clinical importance at 10.8%. Time in TOX was numerically higher with SG than TPC, and the difference stabilized over time. Q-TWiST supports a positive benefit-risk profile for SG over TPC in patients with pretreated HR+/HER2- mBC.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"32 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11941552/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Q-TWiST Analysis of Sacituzumab Govitecan vs. Chemotherapy in Previously Treated Patients with HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Hope S Rugo, Aditya Bardia, Peter Schmid, Sara M Tolaney, Anandaroop Dasgupta, Ankita Kaushik, Wendy Verret, Marine Gosset, Adam Brufsky, Javier Cortés, Frederik Marmé\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol32030169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In TROPiCS-02, sacituzumab govitecan (SG) demonstrated significantly longer overall survival and progression-free survival with improved quality of life vs. chemotherapy treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC). The safety profile was consistent with previous studies of SG. We assessed the benefit--risk profile of SG vs. TPC by integrating patient preferences with clinical benefits using Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms of disease progression or Toxicity of treatment (Q-TWiST) analysis in this study population. Survival time was partitioned into three health states: TOX (grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs] after randomization/before disease progression), REL (disease progression until death or end of follow-up), and TWiST (time without progression or grade ≥3 TEAEs). Health state utility weights were obtained from the published literature. The established threshold for clinically important Q-TWiST gain is 10%. SG demonstrated significantly improved Q-TWiST vs. TPC (mean 9.7 vs. 8.1 months; difference 1.6 months; 95% CI, 0.5-2.7; <i>p</i> = 0.0067), which increased with longer follow-up. Relative Q-TWiST improvement met the threshold for clinical importance at 10.8%. Time in TOX was numerically higher with SG than TPC, and the difference stabilized over time. Q-TWiST supports a positive benefit-risk profile for SG over TPC in patients with pretreated HR+/HER2- mBC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11941552/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32030169\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32030169","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在tropic -02中,与医生选择化疗(TPC)相比,在HR+/HER2-转移性乳腺癌(mBC)患者中,sacituzumab govitecan (SG)显示出更长的总生存期和无进展生存期,并改善了生活质量。安全性与先前的SG研究一致。我们在该研究人群中使用质量调整无疾病进展症状时间或治疗毒性(Q-TWiST)分析,将患者偏好与临床获益相结合,评估了SG与TPC的获益-风险概况。生存时间分为三种健康状态:TOX(随机化后/疾病进展前治疗出现的不良事件[teae]≥3级)、REL(疾病进展至死亡或随访结束)和TWiST(无进展时间或teae≥3级)。健康状态效用权重是从已发表的文献中获得的。临床重要Q-TWiST增益的既定阈值为10%。SG与TPC相比,Q-TWiST显著改善(平均9.7个月vs 8.1个月;差异1.6个月;95% ci, 0.5-2.7;P = 0.0067),随随访时间延长而增加。相对Q-TWiST改善达到临床重要性阈值10.8%。SG在TOX中的时间数值高于TPC,并且随着时间的推移差异趋于稳定。Q-TWiST支持预先治疗的HR+/HER2- mBC患者SG优于TPC的积极获益风险特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Q-TWiST Analysis of Sacituzumab Govitecan vs. Chemotherapy in Previously Treated Patients with HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer.

In TROPiCS-02, sacituzumab govitecan (SG) demonstrated significantly longer overall survival and progression-free survival with improved quality of life vs. chemotherapy treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC). The safety profile was consistent with previous studies of SG. We assessed the benefit--risk profile of SG vs. TPC by integrating patient preferences with clinical benefits using Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms of disease progression or Toxicity of treatment (Q-TWiST) analysis in this study population. Survival time was partitioned into three health states: TOX (grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs] after randomization/before disease progression), REL (disease progression until death or end of follow-up), and TWiST (time without progression or grade ≥3 TEAEs). Health state utility weights were obtained from the published literature. The established threshold for clinically important Q-TWiST gain is 10%. SG demonstrated significantly improved Q-TWiST vs. TPC (mean 9.7 vs. 8.1 months; difference 1.6 months; 95% CI, 0.5-2.7; p = 0.0067), which increased with longer follow-up. Relative Q-TWiST improvement met the threshold for clinical importance at 10.8%. Time in TOX was numerically higher with SG than TPC, and the difference stabilized over time. Q-TWiST supports a positive benefit-risk profile for SG over TPC in patients with pretreated HR+/HER2- mBC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信