Paul Bamford, Amr Abdelrahman, Nadir Elamin, Rowan Hall, Amanda Sherwen, Kate V Gatenby, Amir Aziz, Suleman Aktaa, Christopher J Malkin, Michael S Cunnington, Daniel J Blackman, Noman Ali
{"title":"TAVI期间LVEDP变化的预后意义。","authors":"Paul Bamford, Amr Abdelrahman, Nadir Elamin, Rowan Hall, Amanda Sherwen, Kate V Gatenby, Amir Aziz, Suleman Aktaa, Christopher J Malkin, Michael S Cunnington, Daniel J Blackman, Noman Ali","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been identified as a predictor of heart failure and mortality.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To determine whether change in LVEDP is a more powerful predictor of adverse clinical outcomes than elevated LVEDP post-TAVI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent TAVI at two high volume centers between January 2013 and December 2023 were screened for inclusion. LVEDP measurements were taken before and immediately after TAVI. Hospital records were analyzed for mortality and heart failure hospitalization (HFH). Patients were stratified into those whose LVEDP decreased (post-TAVI LVEDP > 5 mmHg lower), didn't change (±5 mmHg) or increased (post-TAVI LVEDP > 5 mmHg higher).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1073 patients were included. The median follow-up period was 28.9 months with 15.5% followed up for over 5 years. Increase in LVEDP was associated with increased incidence of 5-year mortality (40.3% vs. 28.4% vs. 23.2%; p < 0.001) and HFH (23.3% vs. 10.0% vs. 7.1%; p < 0.001) compared to no change or decrease in LVEDP. On multivariate analysis, increase in LVEDP post-TAVI was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality and HFH. Elevated LVEDP (> 15 mmHg) alone post-TAVI was predictive of HFH but not mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients in whom LVEDP increases post-TAVI have a significantly higher incidence of mortality and HFH within 1 month, and this persists for at least 5-years post-procedure. According to our results, the change in LVEDP is a more powerful predictor of adverse clinical outcomes than elevated post-TAVI LVEDP alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Prognostic Implications of Change in LVEDP during TAVI.\",\"authors\":\"Paul Bamford, Amr Abdelrahman, Nadir Elamin, Rowan Hall, Amanda Sherwen, Kate V Gatenby, Amir Aziz, Suleman Aktaa, Christopher J Malkin, Michael S Cunnington, Daniel J Blackman, Noman Ali\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ccd.31508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been identified as a predictor of heart failure and mortality.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To determine whether change in LVEDP is a more powerful predictor of adverse clinical outcomes than elevated LVEDP post-TAVI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent TAVI at two high volume centers between January 2013 and December 2023 were screened for inclusion. LVEDP measurements were taken before and immediately after TAVI. Hospital records were analyzed for mortality and heart failure hospitalization (HFH). Patients were stratified into those whose LVEDP decreased (post-TAVI LVEDP > 5 mmHg lower), didn't change (±5 mmHg) or increased (post-TAVI LVEDP > 5 mmHg higher).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1073 patients were included. The median follow-up period was 28.9 months with 15.5% followed up for over 5 years. Increase in LVEDP was associated with increased incidence of 5-year mortality (40.3% vs. 28.4% vs. 23.2%; p < 0.001) and HFH (23.3% vs. 10.0% vs. 7.1%; p < 0.001) compared to no change or decrease in LVEDP. On multivariate analysis, increase in LVEDP post-TAVI was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality and HFH. Elevated LVEDP (> 15 mmHg) alone post-TAVI was predictive of HFH but not mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients in whom LVEDP increases post-TAVI have a significantly higher incidence of mortality and HFH within 1 month, and this persists for at least 5-years post-procedure. According to our results, the change in LVEDP is a more powerful predictor of adverse clinical outcomes than elevated post-TAVI LVEDP alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31508\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31508","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)后左室舒张末压(LVEDP)升高已被确定为心力衰竭和死亡率的预测因子。目的:确定LVEDP的变化是否比tavi后LVEDP升高更能预测不良临床结果。方法:筛选2013年1月至2023年12月期间在两个高容量中心接受TAVI的患者。在TAVI之前和之后立即测量LVEDP。分析医院记录的死亡率和心力衰竭住院(HFH)。患者被分为LVEDP降低(tavi后LVEDP >降低5mmhg)、不变(±5mmhg)和升高(tavi后LVEDP >升高5mmhg)三组。结果:共纳入1073例患者。中位随访期为28.9个月,其中15.5%随访超过5年。LVEDP增加与5年死亡率增加相关(40.3% vs. 28.4% vs. 23.2%;tavi后单独p 15 mmHg)可预测HFH,但不能预测死亡率。结论:tavi后LVEDP升高的患者在1个月内的死亡率和HFH发生率显著升高,并且这种情况至少持续5年。根据我们的研究结果,LVEDP的变化比单纯的tavi后LVEDP升高更能预测不良临床结果。
The Prognostic Implications of Change in LVEDP during TAVI.
Background: Elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been identified as a predictor of heart failure and mortality.
Aims: To determine whether change in LVEDP is a more powerful predictor of adverse clinical outcomes than elevated LVEDP post-TAVI.
Methods: Patients who underwent TAVI at two high volume centers between January 2013 and December 2023 were screened for inclusion. LVEDP measurements were taken before and immediately after TAVI. Hospital records were analyzed for mortality and heart failure hospitalization (HFH). Patients were stratified into those whose LVEDP decreased (post-TAVI LVEDP > 5 mmHg lower), didn't change (±5 mmHg) or increased (post-TAVI LVEDP > 5 mmHg higher).
Results: A total of 1073 patients were included. The median follow-up period was 28.9 months with 15.5% followed up for over 5 years. Increase in LVEDP was associated with increased incidence of 5-year mortality (40.3% vs. 28.4% vs. 23.2%; p < 0.001) and HFH (23.3% vs. 10.0% vs. 7.1%; p < 0.001) compared to no change or decrease in LVEDP. On multivariate analysis, increase in LVEDP post-TAVI was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality and HFH. Elevated LVEDP (> 15 mmHg) alone post-TAVI was predictive of HFH but not mortality.
Conclusions: Patients in whom LVEDP increases post-TAVI have a significantly higher incidence of mortality and HFH within 1 month, and this persists for at least 5-years post-procedure. According to our results, the change in LVEDP is a more powerful predictor of adverse clinical outcomes than elevated post-TAVI LVEDP alone.
期刊介绍:
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.