某三级神经眼科中心复视转诊分析。

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Mariam Issa, Milena Cioana, Marko M Popovic, Laura Donaldson, Jonathan Micieli, Edward Margolin
{"title":"某三级神经眼科中心复视转诊分析。","authors":"Mariam Issa, Milena Cioana, Marko M Popovic, Laura Donaldson, Jonathan Micieli, Edward Margolin","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjo.2025.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the potential for morbidity and mortality in patients referred to neuro-ophthalmology service for evaluation of diplopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review of all patients seen by two neuro-ophthalmologists in a tertiary neuro-ophthalmology practice between December 2, 2021, and May 21, 2022, was performed. All patients who were referred for diplopia were included. The primary outcome was to describe the potential for vision loss, progression of symptoms, or systemic morbidity or mortality without a neuro-ophthalmic consult.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred ninety-six patients were referred for diplopia. The mean age at presentation was 61.3 ± 17.0 years, and 48.5% were women. The most common final diagnosis reached following neuro-ophthalmology consultation were cranial nerve palsies (38.3%, 75/196), convergence insufficiency and decompensated phoria (22.4%, 44/196), non-neuro-ophthalmic causes (19.9%, 39/196), thyroid eye disease (4.5%, 9/196), myasthenia gravis (3.5%, 7/196), and multiple sclerosis (6/196, 3.1%). On the basis of final diagnosis, 15.3% of patients referred to neuro-ophthalmology service for diplopia had the potential for morbidity or mortality. Specifically, 1% (2/196) were at risk for visual loss due severe papilledema in the context of untreated idiopathic intracranial hypertension, and 3.0% (6/196) had the potential for systemic morbidity or mortality due to their final diagnosis (brain aneurysms in 2/196, pituitary apoplexy in 1/196, anaplastic glioma in 1/196, and other malignancy in 2/196). In addition, 11.2% (22/196) had the potential for progression of symptoms and systemic morbidity due to thyroid eye disease (9/196), myasthenia gravis (7/196), and multiple sclerosis (6/196). Of the patients who had a prereferral neuroimaging study, 30.1% required additional neuroimaging after neuro-ophthalmic consultation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, 15.3% (30/196) of patients with diplopia had potential for morbidity and mortality without neuro-ophthalmic consultation. This study emphasizes the importance of urgent neuro-ophthalmologic referral for patients with diplopia to allow for appropriate evaluation and investigations to reduce potential morbidity and mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":9606,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of diplopia referrals in a tertiary neuro-ophthalmology center.\",\"authors\":\"Mariam Issa, Milena Cioana, Marko M Popovic, Laura Donaldson, Jonathan Micieli, Edward Margolin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcjo.2025.03.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the potential for morbidity and mortality in patients referred to neuro-ophthalmology service for evaluation of diplopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review of all patients seen by two neuro-ophthalmologists in a tertiary neuro-ophthalmology practice between December 2, 2021, and May 21, 2022, was performed. All patients who were referred for diplopia were included. The primary outcome was to describe the potential for vision loss, progression of symptoms, or systemic morbidity or mortality without a neuro-ophthalmic consult.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred ninety-six patients were referred for diplopia. The mean age at presentation was 61.3 ± 17.0 years, and 48.5% were women. The most common final diagnosis reached following neuro-ophthalmology consultation were cranial nerve palsies (38.3%, 75/196), convergence insufficiency and decompensated phoria (22.4%, 44/196), non-neuro-ophthalmic causes (19.9%, 39/196), thyroid eye disease (4.5%, 9/196), myasthenia gravis (3.5%, 7/196), and multiple sclerosis (6/196, 3.1%). On the basis of final diagnosis, 15.3% of patients referred to neuro-ophthalmology service for diplopia had the potential for morbidity or mortality. Specifically, 1% (2/196) were at risk for visual loss due severe papilledema in the context of untreated idiopathic intracranial hypertension, and 3.0% (6/196) had the potential for systemic morbidity or mortality due to their final diagnosis (brain aneurysms in 2/196, pituitary apoplexy in 1/196, anaplastic glioma in 1/196, and other malignancy in 2/196). In addition, 11.2% (22/196) had the potential for progression of symptoms and systemic morbidity due to thyroid eye disease (9/196), myasthenia gravis (7/196), and multiple sclerosis (6/196). Of the patients who had a prereferral neuroimaging study, 30.1% required additional neuroimaging after neuro-ophthalmic consultation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, 15.3% (30/196) of patients with diplopia had potential for morbidity and mortality without neuro-ophthalmic consultation. This study emphasizes the importance of urgent neuro-ophthalmologic referral for patients with diplopia to allow for appropriate evaluation and investigations to reduce potential morbidity and mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2025.03.001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2025.03.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨复视患者复视后复视的发病率和死亡率。方法:对两名神经眼科医生在2021年12月2日至2022年5月21日期间在三级神经眼科诊所就诊的所有患者进行回顾性图表回顾。所有复视患者均纳入研究。主要结局是在没有神经眼科咨询的情况下描述视力丧失、症状进展或全身性发病率或死亡率的可能性。结果:196例复视患者复诊。平均发病年龄为61.3±17.0岁,女性占48.5%。神经眼科会诊后最常见的最终诊断是颅神经麻痹(38.3%,75/196)、会聚功能不全和失代偿性斜视(22.4%,44/196)、非神经眼科原因(19.9%,39/196)、甲状腺眼病(4.5%,9/196)、重症肌无力(3.5%,7/196)和多发性硬化症(6/196,3.1%)。在复视患者最终诊断时,15.3%的复视患者有发病或死亡的可能性。具体来说,1%(2/196)的患者在未经治疗的特发性颅内高压的情况下存在严重乳头水肿导致视力丧失的风险,3.0%(6/196)的患者由于最终诊断有全身性发病或死亡的可能(2/196为脑动脉瘤,1/196为垂体中风,1/196为间变性胶质瘤,2/196为其他恶性肿瘤)。此外,11.2%(22/196)的患者有可能因甲状腺眼病(9/196)、重症肌无力(7/196)和多发性硬化症(6/196)而出现症状进展和全身性发病。在有门诊前神经影像学研究的患者中,30.1%的患者在神经眼科会诊后需要额外的神经影像学检查。结论:总体而言,15.3%(30/196)的复视患者在没有神经眼科咨询的情况下有发病和死亡的可能。本研究强调复视患者的紧急神经眼科转诊的重要性,以允许适当的评估和调查,以减少潜在的发病率和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of diplopia referrals in a tertiary neuro-ophthalmology center.

Purpose: To determine the potential for morbidity and mortality in patients referred to neuro-ophthalmology service for evaluation of diplopia.

Methods: A retrospective chart review of all patients seen by two neuro-ophthalmologists in a tertiary neuro-ophthalmology practice between December 2, 2021, and May 21, 2022, was performed. All patients who were referred for diplopia were included. The primary outcome was to describe the potential for vision loss, progression of symptoms, or systemic morbidity or mortality without a neuro-ophthalmic consult.

Results: One hundred ninety-six patients were referred for diplopia. The mean age at presentation was 61.3 ± 17.0 years, and 48.5% were women. The most common final diagnosis reached following neuro-ophthalmology consultation were cranial nerve palsies (38.3%, 75/196), convergence insufficiency and decompensated phoria (22.4%, 44/196), non-neuro-ophthalmic causes (19.9%, 39/196), thyroid eye disease (4.5%, 9/196), myasthenia gravis (3.5%, 7/196), and multiple sclerosis (6/196, 3.1%). On the basis of final diagnosis, 15.3% of patients referred to neuro-ophthalmology service for diplopia had the potential for morbidity or mortality. Specifically, 1% (2/196) were at risk for visual loss due severe papilledema in the context of untreated idiopathic intracranial hypertension, and 3.0% (6/196) had the potential for systemic morbidity or mortality due to their final diagnosis (brain aneurysms in 2/196, pituitary apoplexy in 1/196, anaplastic glioma in 1/196, and other malignancy in 2/196). In addition, 11.2% (22/196) had the potential for progression of symptoms and systemic morbidity due to thyroid eye disease (9/196), myasthenia gravis (7/196), and multiple sclerosis (6/196). Of the patients who had a prereferral neuroimaging study, 30.1% required additional neuroimaging after neuro-ophthalmic consultation.

Conclusions: Overall, 15.3% (30/196) of patients with diplopia had potential for morbidity and mortality without neuro-ophthalmic consultation. This study emphasizes the importance of urgent neuro-ophthalmologic referral for patients with diplopia to allow for appropriate evaluation and investigations to reduce potential morbidity and mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
223
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Official journal of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society. The Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology (CJO) is the official journal of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society and is committed to timely publication of original, peer-reviewed ophthalmology and vision science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信