Xuan Ying, Yue Dai, Guannan Bai, Zijian Cheng, Xia Cai
{"title":"不同程度的牙菌斑引起的牙龈炎对牙周治疗的不同反应:一项前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Xuan Ying, Yue Dai, Guannan Bai, Zijian Cheng, Xia Cai","doi":"10.1007/s00784-025-06282-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the clinical response to periodontal treatment in localized and generalized gingivitis using periodontal variables and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty participants (30 with localized gingivitis, 30 with generalized gingivitis) underwent scaling, polishing, and oral hygiene instruction at baseline and monthly follow-ups until periodontal health was restored. Periodontal variables (bleeding on probing [BOP], gingival index [GI], and plaque index [PLI]) along with PROs on oral hygiene practices and the Self-Efficacy Scale for Self-Care (SESS) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 1-month follow-up, generalized gingivitis showed significantly greater improvements in BOP (p < 0.001) and GI (p < 0.001) versus localized gingivitis, with no intergroup difference in PLI reduction (p = 0.747). Periodontal health was achieved in 80% of localized cases versus 30% of generalized cases after single-session therapy (p < 0.001), with 70% of generalized cases requiring multiple re-treatments. Unresolved generalized cases had higher baseline BOP (p = 0.014) but similar baseline PLI (p = 0.322) and no significant differences in treatment-induced BOP (p = 0.137) or PLI changes (p = 0.563). SESS scores improved significantly in both groups, with greater SE-D score improvement in localized cases. Localized gingivitis had higher baseline prolonged brushing rates (> 2 min: 66.7% vs. 33.3%), but post-intervention oral hygiene did not differ between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Localized gingivitis responded well to single-session therapy, whereas generalized gingivitis required multiple treatments due to higher baseline inflammation, emphasizing the need for distinct clinical strategies.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This study supports subtype-specific management in gingivitis, advocating single-session therapy for localized cases and staged interventions for generalized cases to optimize outcomes and reduce overtreatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"29 4","pages":"204"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Varying responses to periodontal treatment in different extent of plaque-induced gingivitis: a prospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Xuan Ying, Yue Dai, Guannan Bai, Zijian Cheng, Xia Cai\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00784-025-06282-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the clinical response to periodontal treatment in localized and generalized gingivitis using periodontal variables and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty participants (30 with localized gingivitis, 30 with generalized gingivitis) underwent scaling, polishing, and oral hygiene instruction at baseline and monthly follow-ups until periodontal health was restored. Periodontal variables (bleeding on probing [BOP], gingival index [GI], and plaque index [PLI]) along with PROs on oral hygiene practices and the Self-Efficacy Scale for Self-Care (SESS) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 1-month follow-up, generalized gingivitis showed significantly greater improvements in BOP (p < 0.001) and GI (p < 0.001) versus localized gingivitis, with no intergroup difference in PLI reduction (p = 0.747). Periodontal health was achieved in 80% of localized cases versus 30% of generalized cases after single-session therapy (p < 0.001), with 70% of generalized cases requiring multiple re-treatments. Unresolved generalized cases had higher baseline BOP (p = 0.014) but similar baseline PLI (p = 0.322) and no significant differences in treatment-induced BOP (p = 0.137) or PLI changes (p = 0.563). SESS scores improved significantly in both groups, with greater SE-D score improvement in localized cases. Localized gingivitis had higher baseline prolonged brushing rates (> 2 min: 66.7% vs. 33.3%), but post-intervention oral hygiene did not differ between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Localized gingivitis responded well to single-session therapy, whereas generalized gingivitis required multiple treatments due to higher baseline inflammation, emphasizing the need for distinct clinical strategies.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This study supports subtype-specific management in gingivitis, advocating single-session therapy for localized cases and staged interventions for generalized cases to optimize outcomes and reduce overtreatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oral Investigations\",\"volume\":\"29 4\",\"pages\":\"204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oral Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06282-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06282-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:通过牙周变量和患者报告的结果(PROs)来比较局部和全面性牙龈炎牙周治疗的临床反应。材料和方法:60名参与者(30名局部牙龈炎患者,30名全面性牙龈炎患者)在基线和每月随访时接受洗牙、抛光和口腔卫生指导,直到牙周健康恢复。评估牙周变量(探诊出血[BOP]、牙龈指数[GI]和菌斑指数[PLI])以及口腔卫生习惯的评分和自我保健自我效能量表(SESS)。结果:在1个月的随访中,全身性牙龈炎患者BOP明显改善(p 2 min: 66.7% vs. 33.3%),但干预后口腔卫生组间无差异。结论:局部牙龈炎对单疗程治疗效果良好,而全身性牙龈炎由于基线炎症较高,需要多次治疗,强调需要不同的临床策略。临床相关性:本研究支持对牙龈炎进行亚型特异性治疗,提倡对局部病例进行单次治疗,对全面性病例进行分阶段干预,以优化结果并减少过度治疗。
Varying responses to periodontal treatment in different extent of plaque-induced gingivitis: a prospective cohort study.
Objectives: To compare the clinical response to periodontal treatment in localized and generalized gingivitis using periodontal variables and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).
Materials and methods: Sixty participants (30 with localized gingivitis, 30 with generalized gingivitis) underwent scaling, polishing, and oral hygiene instruction at baseline and monthly follow-ups until periodontal health was restored. Periodontal variables (bleeding on probing [BOP], gingival index [GI], and plaque index [PLI]) along with PROs on oral hygiene practices and the Self-Efficacy Scale for Self-Care (SESS) were assessed.
Results: At 1-month follow-up, generalized gingivitis showed significantly greater improvements in BOP (p < 0.001) and GI (p < 0.001) versus localized gingivitis, with no intergroup difference in PLI reduction (p = 0.747). Periodontal health was achieved in 80% of localized cases versus 30% of generalized cases after single-session therapy (p < 0.001), with 70% of generalized cases requiring multiple re-treatments. Unresolved generalized cases had higher baseline BOP (p = 0.014) but similar baseline PLI (p = 0.322) and no significant differences in treatment-induced BOP (p = 0.137) or PLI changes (p = 0.563). SESS scores improved significantly in both groups, with greater SE-D score improvement in localized cases. Localized gingivitis had higher baseline prolonged brushing rates (> 2 min: 66.7% vs. 33.3%), but post-intervention oral hygiene did not differ between groups.
Conclusions: Localized gingivitis responded well to single-session therapy, whereas generalized gingivitis required multiple treatments due to higher baseline inflammation, emphasizing the need for distinct clinical strategies.
Clinical relevance: This study supports subtype-specific management in gingivitis, advocating single-session therapy for localized cases and staged interventions for generalized cases to optimize outcomes and reduce overtreatment.
期刊介绍:
The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.