支持第17节精神健康住院病房无薪护理人员休假:护理人员和从业人员的观点。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
BJPsych Open Pub Date : 2025-03-26 DOI:10.1192/bjo.2025.16
Laura Tucker, Nicola Moran, Ruth Naughton-Doe, Emma Wakeman, Mark Wilberforce, Martin Webber
{"title":"支持第17节精神健康住院病房无薪护理人员休假:护理人员和从业人员的观点。","authors":"Laura Tucker, Nicola Moran, Ruth Naughton-Doe, Emma Wakeman, Mark Wilberforce, Martin Webber","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2025.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Care planning for recovery and to work towards hospital discharge is integral to good practice in mental health in-patient settings. Authorised leave from hospital, especially for those who are detained, can be used to check readiness for discharge and to maintain social connections that support a patient's recovery journey. Leave therefore often involves friends and family, or 'carers'. However, carer involvement in planning leave is limited, and carers struggle with feeling unsupported during the leave.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to explore carers' and mental health practitioners' subjective experiences of leave in the context of implementing a set of practice guidelines for involving carers in planning and undertaking leave from hospital.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Nine wards in six National Health Service trusts were recruited to implement the guidelines. Interviews were undertaken with carers (<i>n</i> = 6) and practitioners (<i>n</i> = 3) from these implementation wards and with carers (<i>n</i> = 7) from nine usual care wards. A further ten practitioners completed an anonymous online survey. Data were analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Carers' experiences on both implementation and usual care wards indicated variable levels of involvement, with carers positioned as partners in care, observers of care or outsiders to care. Practitioner perspectives highlighted practical, structural and conceptual challenges in working with carers, which precluded effective implementation of the guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The guidelines reflected what both carers and practitioners described as good practice, but resource limitations, unclear responsibilities and perceptions of carer roles limited engagement. Implementing approaches to working with carers in in-patient settings requires resourcing and clear role definition within staff-carer relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"11 2","pages":"e71"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supporting unpaid carers during section 17 leave from mental health in-patient wards: carer and practitioner perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Tucker, Nicola Moran, Ruth Naughton-Doe, Emma Wakeman, Mark Wilberforce, Martin Webber\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/bjo.2025.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Care planning for recovery and to work towards hospital discharge is integral to good practice in mental health in-patient settings. Authorised leave from hospital, especially for those who are detained, can be used to check readiness for discharge and to maintain social connections that support a patient's recovery journey. Leave therefore often involves friends and family, or 'carers'. However, carer involvement in planning leave is limited, and carers struggle with feeling unsupported during the leave.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to explore carers' and mental health practitioners' subjective experiences of leave in the context of implementing a set of practice guidelines for involving carers in planning and undertaking leave from hospital.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Nine wards in six National Health Service trusts were recruited to implement the guidelines. Interviews were undertaken with carers (<i>n</i> = 6) and practitioners (<i>n</i> = 3) from these implementation wards and with carers (<i>n</i> = 7) from nine usual care wards. A further ten practitioners completed an anonymous online survey. Data were analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Carers' experiences on both implementation and usual care wards indicated variable levels of involvement, with carers positioned as partners in care, observers of care or outsiders to care. Practitioner perspectives highlighted practical, structural and conceptual challenges in working with carers, which precluded effective implementation of the guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The guidelines reflected what both carers and practitioners described as good practice, but resource limitations, unclear responsibilities and perceptions of carer roles limited engagement. Implementing approaches to working with carers in in-patient settings requires resourcing and clear role definition within staff-carer relationships.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJPsych Open\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"e71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJPsych Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.16\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.16","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:康复护理计划和出院工作是精神卫生住院环境良好做法的组成部分。经批准的出院假期,特别是被拘留者的出院假期,可用于检查出院准备情况,并维持支持患者康复旅程的社会联系。因此,休假通常涉及朋友和家人,或“照顾者”。然而,护理人员参与计划休假是有限的,并且护理人员在休假期间感到不受支持。目的:本研究旨在探讨护理人员和心理健康从业人员在实施一套涉及护理人员计划和休病假的实践指南的背景下对休假的主观体验。方法:选取6个国家卫生服务信托机构的9个病房实施指南。对来自这些实施病房的护理人员(n = 6)和从业人员(n = 3)以及来自9个普通护理病房的护理人员(n = 7)进行了访谈。另外10名从业人员完成了一项匿名在线调查。数据按主题进行分析。结果:护理人员在实施和普通护理病房的经历表明,护理人员的参与程度各不相同,他们被定位为护理的合作伙伴、护理的观察者或护理的局外人。从业人员的观点强调了与护理人员合作的实际、结构和概念上的挑战,这些挑战阻碍了指南的有效实施。结论:该指南反映了护理人员和从业人员所描述的良好做法,但资源限制、责任不明确和对护理人员角色的认识限制了参与。在住院环境中实施与护理人员合作的方法需要在工作人员与护理人员的关系中提供资源和明确的角色定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supporting unpaid carers during section 17 leave from mental health in-patient wards: carer and practitioner perspectives.

Background: Care planning for recovery and to work towards hospital discharge is integral to good practice in mental health in-patient settings. Authorised leave from hospital, especially for those who are detained, can be used to check readiness for discharge and to maintain social connections that support a patient's recovery journey. Leave therefore often involves friends and family, or 'carers'. However, carer involvement in planning leave is limited, and carers struggle with feeling unsupported during the leave.

Aims: This study aimed to explore carers' and mental health practitioners' subjective experiences of leave in the context of implementing a set of practice guidelines for involving carers in planning and undertaking leave from hospital.

Method: Nine wards in six National Health Service trusts were recruited to implement the guidelines. Interviews were undertaken with carers (n = 6) and practitioners (n = 3) from these implementation wards and with carers (n = 7) from nine usual care wards. A further ten practitioners completed an anonymous online survey. Data were analysed thematically.

Results: Carers' experiences on both implementation and usual care wards indicated variable levels of involvement, with carers positioned as partners in care, observers of care or outsiders to care. Practitioner perspectives highlighted practical, structural and conceptual challenges in working with carers, which precluded effective implementation of the guidelines.

Conclusions: The guidelines reflected what both carers and practitioners described as good practice, but resource limitations, unclear responsibilities and perceptions of carer roles limited engagement. Implementing approaches to working with carers in in-patient settings requires resourcing and clear role definition within staff-carer relationships.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信