内上髁炎手术技术的系统回顾:评估术前注射和合并尺神经炎对术后预后的影响。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
A Barakat, G Jha, P Raval, E Abourisha, P Divall, H P Singh, R Pandey
{"title":"内上髁炎手术技术的系统回顾:评估术前注射和合并尺神经炎对术后预后的影响。","authors":"A Barakat, G Jha, P Raval, E Abourisha, P Divall, H P Singh, R Pandey","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2025.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Surgical intervention for medial epicondylitis (ME) is indicated when conservative management fails. This review evaluates different surgical techniques for management of ME in terms of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and complication rates with a focus on the prognostic implications of preoperative injections and concomitant ulnar neuritis on postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Major medical databases were searched for relevant ME studies published between 2000 and September 2023. Case reports, reviews, abstract-only studies and pre-2000 studies were excluded. Two independent reviewers assessed the databases. A best evidence synthesis using Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS) criteria summarised findings because of study heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Seventeen surgical studies (442 patients) met the inclusion criteria; most were retrospective (14 studies). MINORS scores ranged from 3 to 14, indicating variable methodological quality. Weighted means showed significant postoperative PRO improvements (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The overall complication rate was 3.1%, with percutaneous techniques showing 0% complications vs 6.4% for arthroscopic release and 11.1% for ulnar nerve transposition. Median time to surgery was 6 months of failed nonoperative treatment. Two studies found minimal impact of preoperative ulnar neuritis on outcomes. One of four studies assessing preoperative injections found a significant negative correlation with outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review highlights a scarcity of high-quality research on surgical ME management. Nevertheless, surgical treatment for recalcitrant cases shows promising outcomes with low complication rates, particularly for percutaneous techniques. The evidence suggests that neither preoperative injections nor pre-existing ulnar neuritis significantly affects postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for ME.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic review of surgical techniques for medial epicondylitis: evaluating the impact of preoperative injections and concomitant ulnar neuritis on postoperative outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"A Barakat, G Jha, P Raval, E Abourisha, P Divall, H P Singh, R Pandey\",\"doi\":\"10.1308/rcsann.2025.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Surgical intervention for medial epicondylitis (ME) is indicated when conservative management fails. This review evaluates different surgical techniques for management of ME in terms of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and complication rates with a focus on the prognostic implications of preoperative injections and concomitant ulnar neuritis on postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Major medical databases were searched for relevant ME studies published between 2000 and September 2023. Case reports, reviews, abstract-only studies and pre-2000 studies were excluded. Two independent reviewers assessed the databases. A best evidence synthesis using Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS) criteria summarised findings because of study heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Seventeen surgical studies (442 patients) met the inclusion criteria; most were retrospective (14 studies). MINORS scores ranged from 3 to 14, indicating variable methodological quality. Weighted means showed significant postoperative PRO improvements (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The overall complication rate was 3.1%, with percutaneous techniques showing 0% complications vs 6.4% for arthroscopic release and 11.1% for ulnar nerve transposition. Median time to surgery was 6 months of failed nonoperative treatment. Two studies found minimal impact of preoperative ulnar neuritis on outcomes. One of four studies assessing preoperative injections found a significant negative correlation with outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review highlights a scarcity of high-quality research on surgical ME management. Nevertheless, surgical treatment for recalcitrant cases shows promising outcomes with low complication rates, particularly for percutaneous techniques. The evidence suggests that neither preoperative injections nor pre-existing ulnar neuritis significantly affects postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for ME.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2025.0005\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2025.0005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:手术治疗内侧上髁炎(ME)时,保守管理失败。本综述从患者报告的预后(PROs)和并发症发生率方面评估了不同的ME手术技术,重点关注术前注射和合并尺神经炎对术后预后的影响。方法:检索2000年至2023年9月发表的相关ME研究的主要医学数据库。排除病例报告、综述、摘要研究和2000年以前的研究。两名独立审稿人对数据库进行了评估。由于研究的异质性,使用非随机研究方法学指数(未成年人)标准进行最佳证据综合。结果:17项外科研究(442例)符合纳入标准;大多数是回顾性研究(14项研究)。未成年人的得分从3到14不等,表明方法质量不一。加权平均数显示术后PRO显著改善(p < 0.05)。总的并发症发生率为3.1%,经皮技术的并发症发生率为0%,而关节镜下释放的并发症发生率为6.4%,尺神经转位的并发症发生率为11.1%。非手术治疗失败的中位手术时间为6个月。两项研究发现术前尺神经炎对预后的影响很小。在评估术前注射的四项研究中,有一项发现注射与预后显著负相关。结论:本综述强调了外科ME治疗的高质量研究的缺乏。然而,手术治疗顽固性病例显示出良好的结果,并发症发生率低,特别是经皮穿刺技术。有证据表明,术前注射和既往尺神经炎都不能显著影响ME手术患者的术后预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systematic review of surgical techniques for medial epicondylitis: evaluating the impact of preoperative injections and concomitant ulnar neuritis on postoperative outcomes.

Introduction: Surgical intervention for medial epicondylitis (ME) is indicated when conservative management fails. This review evaluates different surgical techniques for management of ME in terms of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and complication rates with a focus on the prognostic implications of preoperative injections and concomitant ulnar neuritis on postoperative outcomes.

Methods: Major medical databases were searched for relevant ME studies published between 2000 and September 2023. Case reports, reviews, abstract-only studies and pre-2000 studies were excluded. Two independent reviewers assessed the databases. A best evidence synthesis using Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS) criteria summarised findings because of study heterogeneity.

Findings: Seventeen surgical studies (442 patients) met the inclusion criteria; most were retrospective (14 studies). MINORS scores ranged from 3 to 14, indicating variable methodological quality. Weighted means showed significant postoperative PRO improvements (p > 0.05). The overall complication rate was 3.1%, with percutaneous techniques showing 0% complications vs 6.4% for arthroscopic release and 11.1% for ulnar nerve transposition. Median time to surgery was 6 months of failed nonoperative treatment. Two studies found minimal impact of preoperative ulnar neuritis on outcomes. One of four studies assessing preoperative injections found a significant negative correlation with outcomes.

Conclusions: This review highlights a scarcity of high-quality research on surgical ME management. Nevertheless, surgical treatment for recalcitrant cases shows promising outcomes with low complication rates, particularly for percutaneous techniques. The evidence suggests that neither preoperative injections nor pre-existing ulnar neuritis significantly affects postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for ME.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
316
期刊介绍: The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England is the official scholarly research journal of the Royal College of Surgeons and is published eight times a year in January, February, March, April, May, July, September and November. The main aim of the journal is to publish high-quality, peer-reviewed papers that relate to all branches of surgery. The Annals also includes letters and comments, a regular technical section, controversial topics, CORESS feedback and book reviews. The editorial board is composed of experts from all the surgical specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信