调查预科医生的液体和电解质处方知识。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
D Johnson, J Houdmont, N Levy, D N Lobo
{"title":"调查预科医生的液体和电解质处方知识。","authors":"D Johnson, J Houdmont, N Levy, D N Lobo","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2025.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Changes to the medical curriculum have been advocated to improve knowledge on fluid and electrolytes. We aimed to determine the contemporary level of knowledge of trainee doctors on different aspects of fluid and electrolyte prescribing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was distributed to Foundation Year doctors working throughout the United Kingdom. The first part determined demographic information, where participants studied and currently work, and probed their perceptions of their knowledge on fluid and electrolytes. The second part tested knowledge on a wide variety of aspects of fluid and electrolyte management using 20 multiple-choice questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 190 responses were received. Trainee doctors remain responsible for much of the fluid and electrolyte management of patients, and often practise independently. Overall, the average 'score' of each respondent was suboptimal (52%), with no significant difference found between doctors in the first or second year of postgraduate medical practice. Many participants were unable to correctly identify the components of common intravenous fluid products. Understanding of daily electrolyte requirements was also demonstrated poorly, although most showed a good understanding of the daily requirements of water and glucose. The amount of time in medical school allocated to the topic remains low, as do doctors' confidences in their abilities to prescribe fluid and electrolytes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Knowledge surrounding fluid and electrolyte prescribing remains suboptimal, and Foundation Year doctors are frequently undertaking this responsibility independently. These findings reflect previous research performed over the past 20 years, and little improvement appears to have been made.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the fluid and electrolyte prescribing knowledge of Foundation Year doctors.\",\"authors\":\"D Johnson, J Houdmont, N Levy, D N Lobo\",\"doi\":\"10.1308/rcsann.2025.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Changes to the medical curriculum have been advocated to improve knowledge on fluid and electrolytes. We aimed to determine the contemporary level of knowledge of trainee doctors on different aspects of fluid and electrolyte prescribing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was distributed to Foundation Year doctors working throughout the United Kingdom. The first part determined demographic information, where participants studied and currently work, and probed their perceptions of their knowledge on fluid and electrolytes. The second part tested knowledge on a wide variety of aspects of fluid and electrolyte management using 20 multiple-choice questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 190 responses were received. Trainee doctors remain responsible for much of the fluid and electrolyte management of patients, and often practise independently. Overall, the average 'score' of each respondent was suboptimal (52%), with no significant difference found between doctors in the first or second year of postgraduate medical practice. Many participants were unable to correctly identify the components of common intravenous fluid products. Understanding of daily electrolyte requirements was also demonstrated poorly, although most showed a good understanding of the daily requirements of water and glucose. The amount of time in medical school allocated to the topic remains low, as do doctors' confidences in their abilities to prescribe fluid and electrolytes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Knowledge surrounding fluid and electrolyte prescribing remains suboptimal, and Foundation Year doctors are frequently undertaking this responsibility independently. These findings reflect previous research performed over the past 20 years, and little improvement appears to have been made.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2025.0004\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2025.0004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:医学课程已被提倡改变,以提高对液体和电解质的知识。我们旨在确定实习医生对液体和电解质处方不同方面的当代知识水平。方法:对在英国工作的预科医生进行在线调查。第一部分确定了参与者学习和目前工作的人口信息,并探讨了他们对自己的液体和电解质知识的看法。第二部分测试的知识在各种各样的流体和电解质管理方面使用20个选择题。结果:共收到回复190份。实习医生仍然负责病人的大部分液体和电解质管理,并且经常独立执业。总体而言,每个受访者的平均“得分”都不理想(52%),在第一年或第二年的研究生医疗实践中,医生之间没有发现显着差异。许多参与者无法正确识别常见静脉输液产品的成分。尽管大多数人对水和葡萄糖的日常需求有很好的了解,但对日常电解质需求的了解也很差。医学院在这一课题上的课时仍然很低,医生对自己开液体和电解质处方的能力的信心也很低。结论:关于液体和电解质处方的知识仍然不够理想,基础学年的医生经常独立承担这一责任。这些发现反映了过去20年的研究结果,但似乎没有什么改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating the fluid and electrolyte prescribing knowledge of Foundation Year doctors.

Introduction: Changes to the medical curriculum have been advocated to improve knowledge on fluid and electrolytes. We aimed to determine the contemporary level of knowledge of trainee doctors on different aspects of fluid and electrolyte prescribing.

Methods: An online survey was distributed to Foundation Year doctors working throughout the United Kingdom. The first part determined demographic information, where participants studied and currently work, and probed their perceptions of their knowledge on fluid and electrolytes. The second part tested knowledge on a wide variety of aspects of fluid and electrolyte management using 20 multiple-choice questions.

Results: In total, 190 responses were received. Trainee doctors remain responsible for much of the fluid and electrolyte management of patients, and often practise independently. Overall, the average 'score' of each respondent was suboptimal (52%), with no significant difference found between doctors in the first or second year of postgraduate medical practice. Many participants were unable to correctly identify the components of common intravenous fluid products. Understanding of daily electrolyte requirements was also demonstrated poorly, although most showed a good understanding of the daily requirements of water and glucose. The amount of time in medical school allocated to the topic remains low, as do doctors' confidences in their abilities to prescribe fluid and electrolytes.

Conclusions: Knowledge surrounding fluid and electrolyte prescribing remains suboptimal, and Foundation Year doctors are frequently undertaking this responsibility independently. These findings reflect previous research performed over the past 20 years, and little improvement appears to have been made.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
316
期刊介绍: The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England is the official scholarly research journal of the Royal College of Surgeons and is published eight times a year in January, February, March, April, May, July, September and November. The main aim of the journal is to publish high-quality, peer-reviewed papers that relate to all branches of surgery. The Annals also includes letters and comments, a regular technical section, controversial topics, CORESS feedback and book reviews. The editorial board is composed of experts from all the surgical specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信