MALDI TOF和DART质谱技术在厌氧肠道真菌分类中的应用。

IF 3.8 2区 化学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Markus Neurauter, Julia M Vinzelj, Sophia F A Strobl, Christoph Kappacher, Tobias Schlappack, Jovan Badzoka, Sabine M Podmirseg, Christian W Huck, Matthias Rainer
{"title":"MALDI TOF和DART质谱技术在厌氧肠道真菌分类中的应用。","authors":"Markus Neurauter, Julia M Vinzelj, Sophia F A Strobl, Christoph Kappacher, Tobias Schlappack, Jovan Badzoka, Sabine M Podmirseg, Christian W Huck, Matthias Rainer","doi":"10.1007/s00216-025-05846-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anaerobic gut fungi (AGF) have emerged as promising candidates for optimized biogas and biofuel production due to their unique repertoire of potent lignocellulose-degrading enzymes. However, identifying AGF strains through standard fungal DNA barcodes still poses challenges due to their distinct genomic features. This study explored the applicability of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI) and direct analysis in real-time (DART) mass spectrometry (MS) as alternative methods for AGF identification. Further, the capability of the methods to differentiate strains from different growth phases was investigated. The study found that both MALDI and DART were viable methods for AGF strain identification. MALDI proved to be a precise and robust technique for strain discrimination with prediction accuracies of 94% for unknown standard samples. Even at longer growth times (>3 weeks) MALDI achieved good prediction accuracies with 84%; however, younger cultures (72 h) were only predicted with 63% accuracy. The fast on-target lysis with minimal chemical demand yielded suitable spectra for strain differentiation. DART MS, while effective with prediction accuracies of samples with the same age of up to 93%, exhibited lower prediction accuracies for cultures of different ages, with 14% for young (72 h) and 71% for old (>3 weeks) samples. Further research could enhance the capabilities of these mass spectrometry methods for AGF identification and broaden their application to species-level discrimination and a wider range of AGF genera.</p>","PeriodicalId":462,"journal":{"name":"Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of MALDI TOF and DART mass spectrometry as novel tools for classification of anaerobic gut fungi strains.\",\"authors\":\"Markus Neurauter, Julia M Vinzelj, Sophia F A Strobl, Christoph Kappacher, Tobias Schlappack, Jovan Badzoka, Sabine M Podmirseg, Christian W Huck, Matthias Rainer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00216-025-05846-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Anaerobic gut fungi (AGF) have emerged as promising candidates for optimized biogas and biofuel production due to their unique repertoire of potent lignocellulose-degrading enzymes. However, identifying AGF strains through standard fungal DNA barcodes still poses challenges due to their distinct genomic features. This study explored the applicability of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI) and direct analysis in real-time (DART) mass spectrometry (MS) as alternative methods for AGF identification. Further, the capability of the methods to differentiate strains from different growth phases was investigated. The study found that both MALDI and DART were viable methods for AGF strain identification. MALDI proved to be a precise and robust technique for strain discrimination with prediction accuracies of 94% for unknown standard samples. Even at longer growth times (>3 weeks) MALDI achieved good prediction accuracies with 84%; however, younger cultures (72 h) were only predicted with 63% accuracy. The fast on-target lysis with minimal chemical demand yielded suitable spectra for strain differentiation. DART MS, while effective with prediction accuracies of samples with the same age of up to 93%, exhibited lower prediction accuracies for cultures of different ages, with 14% for young (72 h) and 71% for old (>3 weeks) samples. Further research could enhance the capabilities of these mass spectrometry methods for AGF identification and broaden their application to species-level discrimination and a wider range of AGF genera.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-025-05846-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-025-05846-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

厌氧肠道真菌(AGF)已成为优化沼气和生物燃料生产的有希望的候选者,因为它们具有独特的有效的木质纤维素降解酶。然而,由于其独特的基因组特征,通过标准真菌DNA条形码鉴定AGF菌株仍然面临挑战。本研究探讨了基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI)和实时直接分析质谱(DART)作为AGF鉴定替代方法的适用性。此外,还研究了该方法区分不同生长阶段菌株的能力。研究发现,MALDI和DART两种方法都是鉴定AGF菌株的可行方法。MALDI被证明是一种精确和稳健的应变识别技术,对未知标准样品的预测精度为94%。即使在较长的生长时间(50 - 3周),MALDI的预测准确率也达到了84%;然而,较年轻的培养(72小时)预测准确率只有63%。以最小的化学需氧量进行快速的目标裂解,产生了适合于菌株分化的光谱。DART MS对相同年龄的样品的预测准确率高达93%,但对不同年龄的培养物的预测准确率较低,对年轻(72 h)的预测准确率为14%,对老年(bb0 - 3周)的预测准确率为71%。进一步的研究可以提高这些质谱方法鉴定AGF的能力,并将其应用于物种水平的鉴定和更广泛的AGF属。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of MALDI TOF and DART mass spectrometry as novel tools for classification of anaerobic gut fungi strains.

Anaerobic gut fungi (AGF) have emerged as promising candidates for optimized biogas and biofuel production due to their unique repertoire of potent lignocellulose-degrading enzymes. However, identifying AGF strains through standard fungal DNA barcodes still poses challenges due to their distinct genomic features. This study explored the applicability of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI) and direct analysis in real-time (DART) mass spectrometry (MS) as alternative methods for AGF identification. Further, the capability of the methods to differentiate strains from different growth phases was investigated. The study found that both MALDI and DART were viable methods for AGF strain identification. MALDI proved to be a precise and robust technique for strain discrimination with prediction accuracies of 94% for unknown standard samples. Even at longer growth times (>3 weeks) MALDI achieved good prediction accuracies with 84%; however, younger cultures (72 h) were only predicted with 63% accuracy. The fast on-target lysis with minimal chemical demand yielded suitable spectra for strain differentiation. DART MS, while effective with prediction accuracies of samples with the same age of up to 93%, exhibited lower prediction accuracies for cultures of different ages, with 14% for young (72 h) and 71% for old (>3 weeks) samples. Further research could enhance the capabilities of these mass spectrometry methods for AGF identification and broaden their application to species-level discrimination and a wider range of AGF genera.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
638
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry’s mission is the rapid publication of excellent and high-impact research articles on fundamental and applied topics of analytical and bioanalytical measurement science. Its scope is broad, and ranges from novel measurement platforms and their characterization to multidisciplinary approaches that effectively address important scientific problems. The Editors encourage submissions presenting innovative analytical research in concept, instrumentation, methods, and/or applications, including: mass spectrometry, spectroscopy, and electroanalysis; advanced separations; analytical strategies in “-omics” and imaging, bioanalysis, and sampling; miniaturized devices, medical diagnostics, sensors; analytical characterization of nano- and biomaterials; chemometrics and advanced data analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信