Xiao Yang, Yingli Song, Yan Wang, Ji Zhang, Hui Huang, Jing Zhang, Rongrong Han, Zhixuan Xiang, Lu Chen, Lingling Gao
{"title":"缺乏运动的妊娠期糖尿病高危孕妇:一项横断面研究","authors":"Xiao Yang, Yingli Song, Yan Wang, Ji Zhang, Hui Huang, Jing Zhang, Rongrong Han, Zhixuan Xiang, Lu Chen, Lingling Gao","doi":"10.1111/ijn.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To examine the prevalence and predictors of physical inactivity among pregnant women at high risk for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in mainland China.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A cross-sectional study was implemented in Zhengzhou, China from October 2021 to February 2022. Two hundred fifty-two pregnant women at high risk for GDM were recruited. Physical inactivity was assessed by the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire. The Pregnancy Physical Activity Self-Efficacy Scale, Knowledge of Physical Activity Questionnaire, Social Support for Physical Activity Scale, 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and sociodemographic and antenatal characteristics questionnaire were collected and used to predict physical inactivity. Binary logistic regression was applied. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The prevalence of physical inactivity was 53.2%. The risk factors for physical inactivity included low level of physical activity self-efficacy (aOR: 6.05, 95% CI: 1.13–32.31), middle levels of physical activity self-efficacy (aOR: 5.13, 95% CI: 1.45–18.20), no pregnancy physical activity goals (aOR: 3.06, 95% CI: 1.18–8.0), low pregnancy physical activity goals (aOR: 2.64, 95% CI: 1.02–6.8), nulliparity (aOR: 7.17, 95% CI: 3.74–13.75), having a junior college degree or below (aOR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.10–3.74) and husbands having no habits of regular physical activity (aOR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.06–4.04).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study revealed that physical inactivity among pregnant women at high risk for GDM was a public health concern in mainland China. Physical activity self-efficacy and pregnancy physical activity goals may be used to develop interventions to enhance physical activity.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14223,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","volume":"31 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical Inactivity Among Pregnant Women at High Risk for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study\",\"authors\":\"Xiao Yang, Yingli Song, Yan Wang, Ji Zhang, Hui Huang, Jing Zhang, Rongrong Han, Zhixuan Xiang, Lu Chen, Lingling Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijn.70013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>To examine the prevalence and predictors of physical inactivity among pregnant women at high risk for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in mainland China.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A cross-sectional study was implemented in Zhengzhou, China from October 2021 to February 2022. Two hundred fifty-two pregnant women at high risk for GDM were recruited. Physical inactivity was assessed by the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire. The Pregnancy Physical Activity Self-Efficacy Scale, Knowledge of Physical Activity Questionnaire, Social Support for Physical Activity Scale, 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and sociodemographic and antenatal characteristics questionnaire were collected and used to predict physical inactivity. Binary logistic regression was applied. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The prevalence of physical inactivity was 53.2%. The risk factors for physical inactivity included low level of physical activity self-efficacy (aOR: 6.05, 95% CI: 1.13–32.31), middle levels of physical activity self-efficacy (aOR: 5.13, 95% CI: 1.45–18.20), no pregnancy physical activity goals (aOR: 3.06, 95% CI: 1.18–8.0), low pregnancy physical activity goals (aOR: 2.64, 95% CI: 1.02–6.8), nulliparity (aOR: 7.17, 95% CI: 3.74–13.75), having a junior college degree or below (aOR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.10–3.74) and husbands having no habits of regular physical activity (aOR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.06–4.04).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study revealed that physical inactivity among pregnant women at high risk for GDM was a public health concern in mainland China. Physical activity self-efficacy and pregnancy physical activity goals may be used to develop interventions to enhance physical activity.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Practice\",\"volume\":\"31 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijn.70013\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijn.70013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Physical Inactivity Among Pregnant Women at High Risk for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study
Aim
To examine the prevalence and predictors of physical inactivity among pregnant women at high risk for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in mainland China.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was implemented in Zhengzhou, China from October 2021 to February 2022. Two hundred fifty-two pregnant women at high risk for GDM were recruited. Physical inactivity was assessed by the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire. The Pregnancy Physical Activity Self-Efficacy Scale, Knowledge of Physical Activity Questionnaire, Social Support for Physical Activity Scale, 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and sociodemographic and antenatal characteristics questionnaire were collected and used to predict physical inactivity. Binary logistic regression was applied. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.
Results
The prevalence of physical inactivity was 53.2%. The risk factors for physical inactivity included low level of physical activity self-efficacy (aOR: 6.05, 95% CI: 1.13–32.31), middle levels of physical activity self-efficacy (aOR: 5.13, 95% CI: 1.45–18.20), no pregnancy physical activity goals (aOR: 3.06, 95% CI: 1.18–8.0), low pregnancy physical activity goals (aOR: 2.64, 95% CI: 1.02–6.8), nulliparity (aOR: 7.17, 95% CI: 3.74–13.75), having a junior college degree or below (aOR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.10–3.74) and husbands having no habits of regular physical activity (aOR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.06–4.04).
Conclusion
This study revealed that physical inactivity among pregnant women at high risk for GDM was a public health concern in mainland China. Physical activity self-efficacy and pregnancy physical activity goals may be used to develop interventions to enhance physical activity.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Nursing Practice is a fully refereed journal that publishes original scholarly work that advances the international understanding and development of nursing, both as a profession and as an academic discipline. The Journal focuses on research papers and professional discussion papers that have a sound scientific, theoretical or philosophical base. Preference is given to high-quality papers written in a way that renders them accessible to a wide audience without compromising quality. The primary criteria for acceptance are excellence, relevance and clarity. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.