草料与豆科谷物:对土壤有机碳储量的影响对比——来自欧洲30个田间试验的证据

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE
Ioanna S. Panagea, Paul Quataert, María Alonso-Ayuso, Teresa G. Bárcena, Maarten De Boever, Mariangela Diacono, Anna Jacobs, Johannes L. Jensen, Felix Seidel, Daria Seitz, Heide Spiegel, Thijs Vanden Nest, Axel Don, Greet Ruysschaert
{"title":"草料与豆科谷物:对土壤有机碳储量的影响对比——来自欧洲30个田间试验的证据","authors":"Ioanna S. Panagea,&nbsp;Paul Quataert,&nbsp;María Alonso-Ayuso,&nbsp;Teresa G. Bárcena,&nbsp;Maarten De Boever,&nbsp;Mariangela Diacono,&nbsp;Anna Jacobs,&nbsp;Johannes L. Jensen,&nbsp;Felix Seidel,&nbsp;Daria Seitz,&nbsp;Heide Spiegel,&nbsp;Thijs Vanden Nest,&nbsp;Axel Don,&nbsp;Greet Ruysschaert","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sustainable land management can play an important role in climate change mitigation by reducing soil organic carbon (SOC) losses or even by sequestering C in soils. This can be achieved through practices that increase C inputs to the soil and/or improve the quality of these inputs, thereby facilitating the removal of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) and storing it in the soil as SOC. In this study, we investigated the potential of an increased share of legumes in crop rotations to enhance SOC accrual—defined as the increase in SOC stocks at a given land unit compared to the baseline scenario—using data from 30 mid-term (MTEs, 5–20 years) and long-term (LTEs, 20+ years) field experiments across Europe. Our findings indicate that increasing the proportion of forage legumes in rotations (based on 21 experiments and 39 paired comparisons) led to SOC accrual of up to 13.25 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> (0.44 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>), while grain legumes (based on nine experiments and 28 paired comparisons) resulted in a decrease in SOC stocks of up to 14.37 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> (−0.48 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>) compared to the reference treatment. For forage legumes, the largest SOC gains were achieved at sites with the smallest reference SOC stocks and greater share of forage legumes in the rotation. Our observations suggested that the duration of crop growth of the forage legumes (annual vs. perennial) did not exert a significant impact on SOC stock increase, while pedoclimatic zone did. Positive effects on SOC stocks were more pronounced in the Atlantic climatic zone in contrast to the Mediterranean climatic zone. For grain legumes, larger SOC losses were observed with a greater share of grain legumes in the rotation. Overall, integrating forage legumes in cropping systems can enhance their sustainability and present a viable option for climate change mitigation. Finally, we present a regression equation to derive emission factors (EFs) for estimating SOC changes due to the increase of the share of forage legumes in a rotation, and another due to the increase of the share of grain legumes in the rotation. The first can be used to support the assessment of management impacts for the purpose of rewarding carbon farming and the estimation of a national-scale SOC accrual potential, while the second can be used for estimating national-scale SOC losses.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.70086","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forage vs. Grain Legumes: Contrasting Effects on Soil Organic Carbon Stocks–Evidence From 30 European Field Experiments\",\"authors\":\"Ioanna S. Panagea,&nbsp;Paul Quataert,&nbsp;María Alonso-Ayuso,&nbsp;Teresa G. Bárcena,&nbsp;Maarten De Boever,&nbsp;Mariangela Diacono,&nbsp;Anna Jacobs,&nbsp;Johannes L. Jensen,&nbsp;Felix Seidel,&nbsp;Daria Seitz,&nbsp;Heide Spiegel,&nbsp;Thijs Vanden Nest,&nbsp;Axel Don,&nbsp;Greet Ruysschaert\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejss.70086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Sustainable land management can play an important role in climate change mitigation by reducing soil organic carbon (SOC) losses or even by sequestering C in soils. This can be achieved through practices that increase C inputs to the soil and/or improve the quality of these inputs, thereby facilitating the removal of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) and storing it in the soil as SOC. In this study, we investigated the potential of an increased share of legumes in crop rotations to enhance SOC accrual—defined as the increase in SOC stocks at a given land unit compared to the baseline scenario—using data from 30 mid-term (MTEs, 5–20 years) and long-term (LTEs, 20+ years) field experiments across Europe. Our findings indicate that increasing the proportion of forage legumes in rotations (based on 21 experiments and 39 paired comparisons) led to SOC accrual of up to 13.25 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> (0.44 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>), while grain legumes (based on nine experiments and 28 paired comparisons) resulted in a decrease in SOC stocks of up to 14.37 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> (−0.48 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>) compared to the reference treatment. For forage legumes, the largest SOC gains were achieved at sites with the smallest reference SOC stocks and greater share of forage legumes in the rotation. Our observations suggested that the duration of crop growth of the forage legumes (annual vs. perennial) did not exert a significant impact on SOC stock increase, while pedoclimatic zone did. Positive effects on SOC stocks were more pronounced in the Atlantic climatic zone in contrast to the Mediterranean climatic zone. For grain legumes, larger SOC losses were observed with a greater share of grain legumes in the rotation. Overall, integrating forage legumes in cropping systems can enhance their sustainability and present a viable option for climate change mitigation. Finally, we present a regression equation to derive emission factors (EFs) for estimating SOC changes due to the increase of the share of forage legumes in a rotation, and another due to the increase of the share of grain legumes in the rotation. The first can be used to support the assessment of management impacts for the purpose of rewarding carbon farming and the estimation of a national-scale SOC accrual potential, while the second can be used for estimating national-scale SOC losses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Soil Science\",\"volume\":\"76 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.70086\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Soil Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.70086\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.70086","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可持续土地管理可以通过减少土壤有机碳(SOC)损失,甚至通过在土壤中固存碳,在减缓气候变化方面发挥重要作用。这可以通过增加对土壤的碳输入和/或提高这些输入的质量来实现,从而促进大气二氧化碳(CO2)的去除,并将其作为有机碳储存在土壤中。在这项研究中,我们利用欧洲30个中期(MTEs, 5-20年)和长期(LTEs, 20年以上)田间试验的数据,研究了在作物轮作中增加豆科植物的份额对提高有机碳积累(定义为与基线情景相比,特定土地单元上有机碳储量的增加)的潜力。研究结果表明,与对照处理相比,增加草料豆科作物轮作比例(基于21个试验和39个配对比较)导致土壤有机碳累积高达13.25 Mg ha−1 (0.44 Mg ha−1年−1),而谷物豆科作物(基于9个试验和28个配对比较)导致土壤有机碳储量减少高达14.37 Mg ha−1 (- 0.48 Mg ha−1年−1)。在轮作中,参考土壤有机碳储量最小、饲用豆科作物所占比例较大的场地土壤有机碳收益最大。结果表明,一年生与多年生禾本科豆科作物的生长年限对土壤有机碳储量的增加没有显著影响,而气候带对土壤有机碳储量的增加有显著影响。与地中海气候带相比,大西洋气候带对有机碳储量的正向影响更为显著。对于豆科杂粮作物,轮作中豆科杂粮作物所占比例越大,土壤有机碳损失越大。总体而言,在种植系统中整合饲用豆科作物可以增强其可持续性,并为减缓气候变化提供了一个可行的选择。最后,我们建立了一个回归方程,推导了排放因子(EFs),用于估算轮作中草料豆科植物比例增加所导致的土壤有机碳变化,以及轮作中籽粒豆科植物比例增加所导致的土壤有机碳变化。前者可用于支持管理影响的评估,以奖励碳农业和估计全国范围内的有机碳累积潜力,而后者可用于估计全国范围内的有机碳损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Forage vs. Grain Legumes: Contrasting Effects on Soil Organic Carbon Stocks–Evidence From 30 European Field Experiments

Forage vs. Grain Legumes: Contrasting Effects on Soil Organic Carbon Stocks–Evidence From 30 European Field Experiments

Sustainable land management can play an important role in climate change mitigation by reducing soil organic carbon (SOC) losses or even by sequestering C in soils. This can be achieved through practices that increase C inputs to the soil and/or improve the quality of these inputs, thereby facilitating the removal of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) and storing it in the soil as SOC. In this study, we investigated the potential of an increased share of legumes in crop rotations to enhance SOC accrual—defined as the increase in SOC stocks at a given land unit compared to the baseline scenario—using data from 30 mid-term (MTEs, 5–20 years) and long-term (LTEs, 20+ years) field experiments across Europe. Our findings indicate that increasing the proportion of forage legumes in rotations (based on 21 experiments and 39 paired comparisons) led to SOC accrual of up to 13.25 Mg ha−1 (0.44 Mg ha−1 year−1), while grain legumes (based on nine experiments and 28 paired comparisons) resulted in a decrease in SOC stocks of up to 14.37 Mg ha−1 (−0.48 Mg ha−1 year−1) compared to the reference treatment. For forage legumes, the largest SOC gains were achieved at sites with the smallest reference SOC stocks and greater share of forage legumes in the rotation. Our observations suggested that the duration of crop growth of the forage legumes (annual vs. perennial) did not exert a significant impact on SOC stock increase, while pedoclimatic zone did. Positive effects on SOC stocks were more pronounced in the Atlantic climatic zone in contrast to the Mediterranean climatic zone. For grain legumes, larger SOC losses were observed with a greater share of grain legumes in the rotation. Overall, integrating forage legumes in cropping systems can enhance their sustainability and present a viable option for climate change mitigation. Finally, we present a regression equation to derive emission factors (EFs) for estimating SOC changes due to the increase of the share of forage legumes in a rotation, and another due to the increase of the share of grain legumes in the rotation. The first can be used to support the assessment of management impacts for the purpose of rewarding carbon farming and the estimation of a national-scale SOC accrual potential, while the second can be used for estimating national-scale SOC losses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Science
European Journal of Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: The EJSS is an international journal that publishes outstanding papers in soil science that advance the theoretical and mechanistic understanding of physical, chemical and biological processes and their interactions in soils acting from molecular to continental scales in natural and managed environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信