探索在线开卷期末考试的转变:对问题类型的影响以及学生和学者的体验

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Alice Lu, Joy B. Ghrayche, Reyne Pullen and Stephen R. George-Williams
{"title":"探索在线开卷期末考试的转变:对问题类型的影响以及学生和学者的体验","authors":"Alice Lu, Joy B. Ghrayche, Reyne Pullen and Stephen R. George-Williams","doi":"10.1039/D4RP00290C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The COVID-19 pandemic prompted the shift to online learning, including a change from paper-based (Type-P) exams to online, open-book (Type-O) exams. This study investigated the impact of the sudden shift from Type-P to Type-O exams on the nature of exam questions, and the students’ and academics’ experiences. Type-P and Type-O exams were analysed, focussing on question type, and Bloom's Taxonomy classifications. Type-O exams had a decrease in drawing questions in favour of short answer questions, and a slight shift to lower-order thinking was seen. Other changes were mostly insignificant. Semi-structured interviews with students revealed the main origins of stress for Type-O exams related to technological failures. Students noted they prepared notes for ease of searching for Type-O exams, and optimal memorisation for Type-P exams. Students who had taken both exam types revealed a preference for Type-P exams, as they preferred drawing answers. Semi-structured interviews with academics revealed that writing questions for Type-O exams required more thought to avoid questions with searchable answers. However, academics enjoyed the conveniences of the online format, which includes the automatic marking of multiple-choice questions. Academics appeared to have an astute awareness of the students’ experience with the differing exam types. Our findings suggest that Type-O exams could be successfully integrated into university systems, however there are important considerations that should be addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":69,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","volume":" 2","pages":" 532-543"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the shift to online open-book final exams: the impact on question types and the experiences of students and academics†\",\"authors\":\"Alice Lu, Joy B. Ghrayche, Reyne Pullen and Stephen R. George-Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D4RP00290C\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >The COVID-19 pandemic prompted the shift to online learning, including a change from paper-based (Type-P) exams to online, open-book (Type-O) exams. This study investigated the impact of the sudden shift from Type-P to Type-O exams on the nature of exam questions, and the students’ and academics’ experiences. Type-P and Type-O exams were analysed, focussing on question type, and Bloom's Taxonomy classifications. Type-O exams had a decrease in drawing questions in favour of short answer questions, and a slight shift to lower-order thinking was seen. Other changes were mostly insignificant. Semi-structured interviews with students revealed the main origins of stress for Type-O exams related to technological failures. Students noted they prepared notes for ease of searching for Type-O exams, and optimal memorisation for Type-P exams. Students who had taken both exam types revealed a preference for Type-P exams, as they preferred drawing answers. Semi-structured interviews with academics revealed that writing questions for Type-O exams required more thought to avoid questions with searchable answers. However, academics enjoyed the conveniences of the online format, which includes the automatic marking of multiple-choice questions. Academics appeared to have an astute awareness of the students’ experience with the differing exam types. Our findings suggest that Type-O exams could be successfully integrated into university systems, however there are important considerations that should be addressed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":69,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemistry Education Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\" 2\",\"pages\":\" 532-543\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemistry Education Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/rp/d4rp00290c\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/rp/d4rp00290c","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019冠状病毒病大流行促使学生转向在线学习,包括从纸质(p型)考试转向在线开卷(o型)考试。本研究调查了从p型考试到o型考试的突然转变对考试问题性质的影响,以及学生和学者的经历。分析了p型和o型考试,重点分析了问题类型和布鲁姆分类法的分类。在o型考试中,画题减少了,而简答题更受欢迎,而且学生们的思维也有了轻微的转变。其他的变化基本上是微不足道的。与学生进行的半结构化访谈揭示了与技术故障有关的o型考试压力的主要来源。学生们指出,他们准备了笔记,以便于查找o型考试,并为p型考试准备了最佳记忆。参加过两种考试类型的学生都更喜欢p型考试,因为他们更喜欢画答案。对学者的半结构化采访显示,为o型考试写题需要更多的思考,以避免有可搜索答案的问题。然而,学者们享受着在线形式的便利,其中包括多项选择题的自动评分。学者们似乎敏锐地意识到学生们对不同考试类型的体验。我们的研究结果表明,o型考试可以成功地整合到大学系统中,但是还有一些重要的考虑需要解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the shift to online open-book final exams: the impact on question types and the experiences of students and academics†

The COVID-19 pandemic prompted the shift to online learning, including a change from paper-based (Type-P) exams to online, open-book (Type-O) exams. This study investigated the impact of the sudden shift from Type-P to Type-O exams on the nature of exam questions, and the students’ and academics’ experiences. Type-P and Type-O exams were analysed, focussing on question type, and Bloom's Taxonomy classifications. Type-O exams had a decrease in drawing questions in favour of short answer questions, and a slight shift to lower-order thinking was seen. Other changes were mostly insignificant. Semi-structured interviews with students revealed the main origins of stress for Type-O exams related to technological failures. Students noted they prepared notes for ease of searching for Type-O exams, and optimal memorisation for Type-P exams. Students who had taken both exam types revealed a preference for Type-P exams, as they preferred drawing answers. Semi-structured interviews with academics revealed that writing questions for Type-O exams required more thought to avoid questions with searchable answers. However, academics enjoyed the conveniences of the online format, which includes the automatic marking of multiple-choice questions. Academics appeared to have an astute awareness of the students’ experience with the differing exam types. Our findings suggest that Type-O exams could be successfully integrated into university systems, however there are important considerations that should be addressed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
26.70%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal for teachers, researchers and other practitioners in chemistry education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信