黑暗人格与攻击之间的思想:暴力意念的中介作用

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Pilar Rico-Bordera , David Pineda , José A. Piqueras , Manuel Galán
{"title":"黑暗人格与攻击之间的思想:暴力意念的中介作用","authors":"Pilar Rico-Bordera ,&nbsp;David Pineda ,&nbsp;José A. Piqueras ,&nbsp;Manuel Galán","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Theory of Planned Behavior posits that intentionality is the primary antecedent of behavior. While the effects of Dark Tetrad traits on aggressive behavior are well-documented, and violent ideation has also been identified as a significant predictor of aggression, research exploring the interrelationships between these factors remains limited. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between Dark Tetrad and reactive and proactive aggression, as well as to examine whether this relationship could be mediated by violent ideation. A sample of 824 Spaniards completed measures of Dark Tetrad, violent ideation, and aggression. Results showed that psychopathy and sadism had the strongest direct effects on both types of aggression, while Machiavellianism and narcissism presented weaker associations. Violent ideation partially mediated these relationships, though the indirect effects were small, indicating that other mechanisms contribute to aggression. In the combined model, which controlled for shared variance among traits, Machiavellianism retained a direct effect only on reactive aggression, while sadism remained a predictor of proactive aggression. In contrast, narcissism lost all predictive power. Proactive and reactive aggression shows distinct underlying motivations. These findings underscore the importance of comprehensively understanding the intrapersonal variables that impact aggression, which facilitates a more accurate approach to identifying risk factors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"241 ","pages":"Article 113176"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thoughts between dark personality and aggression: The mediating role of violent ideation\",\"authors\":\"Pilar Rico-Bordera ,&nbsp;David Pineda ,&nbsp;José A. Piqueras ,&nbsp;Manuel Galán\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Theory of Planned Behavior posits that intentionality is the primary antecedent of behavior. While the effects of Dark Tetrad traits on aggressive behavior are well-documented, and violent ideation has also been identified as a significant predictor of aggression, research exploring the interrelationships between these factors remains limited. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between Dark Tetrad and reactive and proactive aggression, as well as to examine whether this relationship could be mediated by violent ideation. A sample of 824 Spaniards completed measures of Dark Tetrad, violent ideation, and aggression. Results showed that psychopathy and sadism had the strongest direct effects on both types of aggression, while Machiavellianism and narcissism presented weaker associations. Violent ideation partially mediated these relationships, though the indirect effects were small, indicating that other mechanisms contribute to aggression. In the combined model, which controlled for shared variance among traits, Machiavellianism retained a direct effect only on reactive aggression, while sadism remained a predictor of proactive aggression. In contrast, narcissism lost all predictive power. Proactive and reactive aggression shows distinct underlying motivations. These findings underscore the importance of comprehensively understanding the intrapersonal variables that impact aggression, which facilitates a more accurate approach to identifying risk factors.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"241 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925001382\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925001382","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

计划行为理论认为意向性是行为的首要前提。虽然黑暗四分体特征对攻击行为的影响已被充分证明,暴力思想也被确定为攻击的重要预测因素,但探索这些因素之间相互关系的研究仍然有限。本研究旨在分析黑暗四分体与被动攻击和主动攻击之间的关系,并探讨这种关系是否可以通过暴力思维来调节。824名西班牙人完成了暗黑四分体、暴力思维和侵略行为的测试。结果表明,精神病和虐待狂对两种类型的攻击都有最强的直接影响,而马基雅维利主义和自恋则表现出较弱的关联。尽管间接影响很小,但暴力意念部分地介导了这些关系,这表明其他机制有助于攻击。在综合模型中,控制了特征之间的共同方差,马基雅维利主义只对反应性攻击有直接影响,而虐待狂仍然是主动攻击的预测因子。相比之下,自恋失去了所有的预测能力。主动攻击和被动攻击表现出不同的潜在动机。这些发现强调了全面理解影响攻击的个人内部变量的重要性,这有助于更准确地识别风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thoughts between dark personality and aggression: The mediating role of violent ideation
The Theory of Planned Behavior posits that intentionality is the primary antecedent of behavior. While the effects of Dark Tetrad traits on aggressive behavior are well-documented, and violent ideation has also been identified as a significant predictor of aggression, research exploring the interrelationships between these factors remains limited. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between Dark Tetrad and reactive and proactive aggression, as well as to examine whether this relationship could be mediated by violent ideation. A sample of 824 Spaniards completed measures of Dark Tetrad, violent ideation, and aggression. Results showed that psychopathy and sadism had the strongest direct effects on both types of aggression, while Machiavellianism and narcissism presented weaker associations. Violent ideation partially mediated these relationships, though the indirect effects were small, indicating that other mechanisms contribute to aggression. In the combined model, which controlled for shared variance among traits, Machiavellianism retained a direct effect only on reactive aggression, while sadism remained a predictor of proactive aggression. In contrast, narcissism lost all predictive power. Proactive and reactive aggression shows distinct underlying motivations. These findings underscore the importance of comprehensively understanding the intrapersonal variables that impact aggression, which facilitates a more accurate approach to identifying risk factors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信