中国蓝领职场闲聊中的分歧:与区域知识相关的评估的作用

IF 1.8 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Buqing Yu, Dorien Van De Mieroop
{"title":"中国蓝领职场闲聊中的分歧:与区域知识相关的评估的作用","authors":"Buqing Yu,&nbsp;Dorien Van De Mieroop","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.03.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores some of the complexities of small talk in Chinese blue-collar workplaces, focusing on disagreements within these interactions. Particularly, we zoom in on how these disagreements can be initiated and navigated through assessments relating to regional knowledge, as these may construct epistemic primacy, both sequentially and on a contextual basis. Drawing on authentic recordings and ethnographic fieldnotes, we investigate these interactions by means of a qualitative discourse analytical approach. At first sight, our findings suggest that the small talk sequences in our data are a locus for expressing difference and foregrounding varying degrees of tension. Yet, we argue that through disagreeing, the participants may also demonstrate engagement in the interaction and may thus, in one form or another, establish rapport as well. In this way, this research contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of workplace small talk and disagreement, emphasizing their multifaceted nature, while also extending the scope of current research to under-researched workplace contexts such as Chinese blue-collar workplaces.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"241 ","pages":"Pages 16-29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disagreement in Chinese blue-collar workplace small talk: The role of assessments relating to regional knowledge\",\"authors\":\"Buqing Yu,&nbsp;Dorien Van De Mieroop\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.03.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study explores some of the complexities of small talk in Chinese blue-collar workplaces, focusing on disagreements within these interactions. Particularly, we zoom in on how these disagreements can be initiated and navigated through assessments relating to regional knowledge, as these may construct epistemic primacy, both sequentially and on a contextual basis. Drawing on authentic recordings and ethnographic fieldnotes, we investigate these interactions by means of a qualitative discourse analytical approach. At first sight, our findings suggest that the small talk sequences in our data are a locus for expressing difference and foregrounding varying degrees of tension. Yet, we argue that through disagreeing, the participants may also demonstrate engagement in the interaction and may thus, in one form or another, establish rapport as well. In this way, this research contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of workplace small talk and disagreement, emphasizing their multifaceted nature, while also extending the scope of current research to under-researched workplace contexts such as Chinese blue-collar workplaces.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pragmatics\",\"volume\":\"241 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 16-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216625000682\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216625000682","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了中国蓝领工作场所闲聊的一些复杂性,重点是这些互动中的分歧。特别是,我们通过与区域知识相关的评估,深入探讨了这些分歧是如何引发和引导的,因为这些评估可能会构建认识论上的优先权,既有先后顺序,也有语境基础。我们利用真实录音和人种学田野笔记,通过定性话语分析方法研究了这些互动。乍一看,我们的研究结果表明,数据中的小范围谈话是表达差异和凸显不同程度紧张关系的场所。然而,我们认为,通过意见分歧,参与者也可以表现出对互动的参与,从而以这样或那样的形式建立起融洽的关系。因此,本研究有助于更全面地理解职场闲谈和分歧,强调它们的多面性,同时也将当前的研究范围扩展到研究不足的职场环境,如中国蓝领工作场所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disagreement in Chinese blue-collar workplace small talk: The role of assessments relating to regional knowledge
This study explores some of the complexities of small talk in Chinese blue-collar workplaces, focusing on disagreements within these interactions. Particularly, we zoom in on how these disagreements can be initiated and navigated through assessments relating to regional knowledge, as these may construct epistemic primacy, both sequentially and on a contextual basis. Drawing on authentic recordings and ethnographic fieldnotes, we investigate these interactions by means of a qualitative discourse analytical approach. At first sight, our findings suggest that the small talk sequences in our data are a locus for expressing difference and foregrounding varying degrees of tension. Yet, we argue that through disagreeing, the participants may also demonstrate engagement in the interaction and may thus, in one form or another, establish rapport as well. In this way, this research contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of workplace small talk and disagreement, emphasizing their multifaceted nature, while also extending the scope of current research to under-researched workplace contexts such as Chinese blue-collar workplaces.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
219
期刊介绍: Since 1977, the Journal of Pragmatics has provided a forum for bringing together a wide range of research in pragmatics, including cognitive pragmatics, corpus pragmatics, experimental pragmatics, historical pragmatics, interpersonal pragmatics, multimodal pragmatics, sociopragmatics, theoretical pragmatics and related fields. Our aim is to publish innovative pragmatic scholarship from all perspectives, which contributes to theories of how speakers produce and interpret language in different contexts drawing on attested data from a wide range of languages/cultures in different parts of the world. The Journal of Pragmatics also encourages work that uses attested language data to explore the relationship between pragmatics and neighbouring research areas such as semantics, discourse analysis, conversation analysis and ethnomethodology, interactional linguistics, sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, media studies, psychology, sociology, and the philosophy of language. Alongside full-length articles, discussion notes and book reviews, the journal welcomes proposals for high quality special issues in all areas of pragmatics which make a significant contribution to a topical or developing area at the cutting-edge of research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信