增强和维持经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对持续性幻觉精神分裂症患者的反应:一项来自自然主义临床队列的回顾性探索性研究

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Rujuta Parlikar , Priyavarshini Boopathy , Harsh Pathak , Dinakaran Damodaran , Sowmya Selvaraj , Harleen Chhabra , Swarna Buddha Nayok , Vani Holebasavanahalli Thimmashetty , Anushree Bose , Sri Mahavir Agarwal , Venkataram Shivakumar , Vanteemar S. Sreeraj , Janardhanan C. Narayanaswamy , Ganesan Venkatasubramanian
{"title":"增强和维持经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对持续性幻觉精神分裂症患者的反应:一项来自自然主义临床队列的回顾性探索性研究","authors":"Rujuta Parlikar ,&nbsp;Priyavarshini Boopathy ,&nbsp;Harsh Pathak ,&nbsp;Dinakaran Damodaran ,&nbsp;Sowmya Selvaraj ,&nbsp;Harleen Chhabra ,&nbsp;Swarna Buddha Nayok ,&nbsp;Vani Holebasavanahalli Thimmashetty ,&nbsp;Anushree Bose ,&nbsp;Sri Mahavir Agarwal ,&nbsp;Venkataram Shivakumar ,&nbsp;Vanteemar S. Sreeraj ,&nbsp;Janardhanan C. Narayanaswamy ,&nbsp;Ganesan Venkatasubramanian","doi":"10.1016/j.ajp.2025.104457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may help to alleviate persistent auditory hallucinations (AH) in schizophrenia, though its effects vary. This study examines the effectiveness, replicability and tolerance of booster and maintenance tDCS courses administered to patients with schizophrenia in a naturalistic clinical setting after an initial tDCS course.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirty-three patients received booster course(s) (after symptom relapse) and/or maintenance courses (to prevent relapse) following an initial course of 2–15 days. Linear mixed-effect (LME) model and intra-class correlation (ICC) evaluated the differences and consistency of percentage improvement in AH across the initial and booster courses. The duration between the initial and the first booster course served as a proxy for time to relapse, with its relationship to clinical and demographic measures analyzed using Pearson’s correlation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The booster course was safely administered in 33 patients, 22 weeks after the initial course. AH improved significantly in 20 patients. The improvement percentages for the initial (43.6 %) and the booster courses (29.3 %) had an ICC of 0.711 (95 %CI:0.372–0.868, p &lt; 0.001), suggesting moderate replicability of effects. The LME model revealed that course type and number of tDCS sessions significantly influenced improvement. Maintenance tDCS was administered in 5 patients at 1–4 week intervals, with 2 maintaining improvement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study offers insights into the likely duration of initial tDCS effects and highlights the utility of booster courses for individuals who responded to the initial treatment. The study suggests the possibility of using maintenance tDCS in patients who have responded to the initial or booster treatments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8543,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of psychiatry","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 104457"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Boosting and maintaining the response to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in schizophrenia with persistent hallucinations: A retrospective exploratory study from a naturalistic clinical cohort\",\"authors\":\"Rujuta Parlikar ,&nbsp;Priyavarshini Boopathy ,&nbsp;Harsh Pathak ,&nbsp;Dinakaran Damodaran ,&nbsp;Sowmya Selvaraj ,&nbsp;Harleen Chhabra ,&nbsp;Swarna Buddha Nayok ,&nbsp;Vani Holebasavanahalli Thimmashetty ,&nbsp;Anushree Bose ,&nbsp;Sri Mahavir Agarwal ,&nbsp;Venkataram Shivakumar ,&nbsp;Vanteemar S. Sreeraj ,&nbsp;Janardhanan C. Narayanaswamy ,&nbsp;Ganesan Venkatasubramanian\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajp.2025.104457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may help to alleviate persistent auditory hallucinations (AH) in schizophrenia, though its effects vary. This study examines the effectiveness, replicability and tolerance of booster and maintenance tDCS courses administered to patients with schizophrenia in a naturalistic clinical setting after an initial tDCS course.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirty-three patients received booster course(s) (after symptom relapse) and/or maintenance courses (to prevent relapse) following an initial course of 2–15 days. Linear mixed-effect (LME) model and intra-class correlation (ICC) evaluated the differences and consistency of percentage improvement in AH across the initial and booster courses. The duration between the initial and the first booster course served as a proxy for time to relapse, with its relationship to clinical and demographic measures analyzed using Pearson’s correlation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The booster course was safely administered in 33 patients, 22 weeks after the initial course. AH improved significantly in 20 patients. The improvement percentages for the initial (43.6 %) and the booster courses (29.3 %) had an ICC of 0.711 (95 %CI:0.372–0.868, p &lt; 0.001), suggesting moderate replicability of effects. The LME model revealed that course type and number of tDCS sessions significantly influenced improvement. Maintenance tDCS was administered in 5 patients at 1–4 week intervals, with 2 maintaining improvement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study offers insights into the likely duration of initial tDCS effects and highlights the utility of booster courses for individuals who responded to the initial treatment. The study suggests the possibility of using maintenance tDCS in patients who have responded to the initial or booster treatments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian journal of psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"107 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104457\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian journal of psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876201825001005\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876201825001005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)可能有助于缓解精神分裂症患者的持续性幻听(AH),尽管其效果各不相同。本研究考察了精神分裂症患者在初始tDCS疗程后,在自然临床环境中给予增强和维持tDCS疗程的有效性、可复制性和耐受性。方法33例患者在初始疗程2-15天后接受强化疗程(症状复发后)和/或维持疗程(预防复发)。线性混合效应(LME)模型和班级内相关性(ICC)评估了初始和强化课程中AH改善百分比的差异和一致性。初始和第一次强化疗程之间的持续时间作为复发时间的代理,其与临床和人口统计指标的关系使用Pearson相关分析。结果33例患者在初始疗程22周后安全接受强化疗程。20例患者AH明显改善。初始疗程的改善百分比(43.6 %)和强化疗程的改善百分比(29.3 %)的ICC为0.711(95 %CI: 0.372-0.868, p <; 0.001),表明效果具有中等的可复制性。LME模型显示,课程类型和tDCS会话次数显著影响改善。5例患者每隔1-4周给予维持性tDCS治疗,2例患者维持改善。结论:本研究提供了初步tDCS效应可能持续时间的见解,并强调了对初始治疗有反应的个体进行加强疗程的效用。该研究表明,在对初始治疗或加强治疗有反应的患者中使用维持性tDCS的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Boosting and maintaining the response to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in schizophrenia with persistent hallucinations: A retrospective exploratory study from a naturalistic clinical cohort

Background

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may help to alleviate persistent auditory hallucinations (AH) in schizophrenia, though its effects vary. This study examines the effectiveness, replicability and tolerance of booster and maintenance tDCS courses administered to patients with schizophrenia in a naturalistic clinical setting after an initial tDCS course.

Methods

Thirty-three patients received booster course(s) (after symptom relapse) and/or maintenance courses (to prevent relapse) following an initial course of 2–15 days. Linear mixed-effect (LME) model and intra-class correlation (ICC) evaluated the differences and consistency of percentage improvement in AH across the initial and booster courses. The duration between the initial and the first booster course served as a proxy for time to relapse, with its relationship to clinical and demographic measures analyzed using Pearson’s correlation.

Results

The booster course was safely administered in 33 patients, 22 weeks after the initial course. AH improved significantly in 20 patients. The improvement percentages for the initial (43.6 %) and the booster courses (29.3 %) had an ICC of 0.711 (95 %CI:0.372–0.868, p < 0.001), suggesting moderate replicability of effects. The LME model revealed that course type and number of tDCS sessions significantly influenced improvement. Maintenance tDCS was administered in 5 patients at 1–4 week intervals, with 2 maintaining improvement.

Conclusion

This study offers insights into the likely duration of initial tDCS effects and highlights the utility of booster courses for individuals who responded to the initial treatment. The study suggests the possibility of using maintenance tDCS in patients who have responded to the initial or booster treatments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian journal of psychiatry
Asian journal of psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
297
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Psychiatry serves as a comprehensive resource for psychiatrists, mental health clinicians, neurologists, physicians, mental health students, and policymakers. Its goal is to facilitate the exchange of research findings and clinical practices between Asia and the global community. The journal focuses on psychiatric research relevant to Asia, covering preclinical, clinical, service system, and policy development topics. It also highlights the socio-cultural diversity of the region in relation to mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信