{"title":"法国生命伦理学的基本原则——在神话与现实之间","authors":"C. Byk","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>French bioethics is often perceived as an ethic that gives precedence to legislative norms over flexible ethical standards. In our view, the French approach is more nuanced. Although its regulatory force is based essentially on State standards, these combine a series of principles inspired by human rights with provisions specific to each biomedical technique, the latter themselves being influenced by the practices of healthcare professionals. In addition, this legislation has a dual political aim: to ensure that citizens have access to new medical technologies, and to enhance the professional, moral and economic quality of the healthcare system, hence the need for new players (ethics committees and health agencies) to oversee this dynamic. The result is a complex system, with a multiplicity of players whose roles sometimes overlap, leading to a number of phenomena: risks of incoherence and the temptation of a State takeover, further neglecting clinical ethics and citizen participation in the development of public policy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37707,"journal":{"name":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101078"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fundamental principles of French bioethics — Between myth and reality\",\"authors\":\"C. Byk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>French bioethics is often perceived as an ethic that gives precedence to legislative norms over flexible ethical standards. In our view, the French approach is more nuanced. Although its regulatory force is based essentially on State standards, these combine a series of principles inspired by human rights with provisions specific to each biomedical technique, the latter themselves being influenced by the practices of healthcare professionals. In addition, this legislation has a dual political aim: to ensure that citizens have access to new medical technologies, and to enhance the professional, moral and economic quality of the healthcare system, hence the need for new players (ethics committees and health agencies) to oversee this dynamic. The result is a complex system, with a multiplicity of players whose roles sometimes overlap, leading to a number of phenomena: risks of incoherence and the temptation of a State takeover, further neglecting clinical ethics and citizen participation in the development of public policy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101078\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552525000374\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552525000374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fundamental principles of French bioethics — Between myth and reality
French bioethics is often perceived as an ethic that gives precedence to legislative norms over flexible ethical standards. In our view, the French approach is more nuanced. Although its regulatory force is based essentially on State standards, these combine a series of principles inspired by human rights with provisions specific to each biomedical technique, the latter themselves being influenced by the practices of healthcare professionals. In addition, this legislation has a dual political aim: to ensure that citizens have access to new medical technologies, and to enhance the professional, moral and economic quality of the healthcare system, hence the need for new players (ethics committees and health agencies) to oversee this dynamic. The result is a complex system, with a multiplicity of players whose roles sometimes overlap, leading to a number of phenomena: risks of incoherence and the temptation of a State takeover, further neglecting clinical ethics and citizen participation in the development of public policy.
期刊介绍:
This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate.