法国生命伦理学的基本原则——在神话与现实之间

Q3 Medicine
C. Byk
{"title":"法国生命伦理学的基本原则——在神话与现实之间","authors":"C. Byk","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>French bioethics is often perceived as an ethic that gives precedence to legislative norms over flexible ethical standards. In our view, the French approach is more nuanced. Although its regulatory force is based essentially on State standards, these combine a series of principles inspired by human rights with provisions specific to each biomedical technique, the latter themselves being influenced by the practices of healthcare professionals. In addition, this legislation has a dual political aim: to ensure that citizens have access to new medical technologies, and to enhance the professional, moral and economic quality of the healthcare system, hence the need for new players (ethics committees and health agencies) to oversee this dynamic. The result is a complex system, with a multiplicity of players whose roles sometimes overlap, leading to a number of phenomena: risks of incoherence and the temptation of a State takeover, further neglecting clinical ethics and citizen participation in the development of public policy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37707,"journal":{"name":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101078"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fundamental principles of French bioethics — Between myth and reality\",\"authors\":\"C. Byk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>French bioethics is often perceived as an ethic that gives precedence to legislative norms over flexible ethical standards. In our view, the French approach is more nuanced. Although its regulatory force is based essentially on State standards, these combine a series of principles inspired by human rights with provisions specific to each biomedical technique, the latter themselves being influenced by the practices of healthcare professionals. In addition, this legislation has a dual political aim: to ensure that citizens have access to new medical technologies, and to enhance the professional, moral and economic quality of the healthcare system, hence the need for new players (ethics committees and health agencies) to oversee this dynamic. The result is a complex system, with a multiplicity of players whose roles sometimes overlap, leading to a number of phenomena: risks of incoherence and the temptation of a State takeover, further neglecting clinical ethics and citizen participation in the development of public policy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101078\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552525000374\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552525000374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

法国生物伦理学通常被认为是一种优先于立法规范而不是灵活的伦理标准的伦理。在我们看来,法国的做法更为微妙。尽管其监管力量主要以国家标准为基础,但这些标准将一系列源于人权的原则与每种生物医学技术的具体规定结合起来,后者本身受到保健专业人员做法的影响。此外,这项立法具有双重政治目标:确保公民能够获得新的医疗技术,并提高医疗保健系统的专业、道德和经济质量,因此需要新的参与者(道德委员会和卫生机构)来监督这一动态。其结果是一个复杂的系统,其中有许多参与者,其作用有时重叠,导致一些现象:不连贯的风险和国家接管的诱惑,进一步忽视临床道德和公民参与制定公共政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fundamental principles of French bioethics — Between myth and reality
French bioethics is often perceived as an ethic that gives precedence to legislative norms over flexible ethical standards. In our view, the French approach is more nuanced. Although its regulatory force is based essentially on State standards, these combine a series of principles inspired by human rights with provisions specific to each biomedical technique, the latter themselves being influenced by the practices of healthcare professionals. In addition, this legislation has a dual political aim: to ensure that citizens have access to new medical technologies, and to enhance the professional, moral and economic quality of the healthcare system, hence the need for new players (ethics committees and health agencies) to oversee this dynamic. The result is a complex system, with a multiplicity of players whose roles sometimes overlap, leading to a number of phenomena: risks of incoherence and the temptation of a State takeover, further neglecting clinical ethics and citizen participation in the development of public policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信