采用MLOps的经验指南:框架、成熟度模型和分类法

IF 4.3 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Meenu Mary John , Helena Holmström Olsson , Jan Bosch
{"title":"采用MLOps的经验指南:框架、成熟度模型和分类法","authors":"Meenu Mary John ,&nbsp;Helena Holmström Olsson ,&nbsp;Jan Bosch","doi":"10.1016/j.infsof.2025.107725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context:</h3><div>Machine Learning Operations (MLOps) has become a top priority for companies. However, its adoption has become challenging due to the need for proper guidance and awareness. Most of the MLOps solutions available in the market are designed to fit the specific platform, tools and culture of the providers.</div></div><div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>The objective is to develop a structured approach to adopting, assessing and advancing MLOps adoption.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>The study was conducted based on a multi-case study across fourteen companies.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>We provide a comprehensive analysis that highlights the similarities and differences in the adoption of MLOps practices among companies. We have also empirically validated the developed MLOps framework and MLOps maturity model. Furthermore, we carefully reviewed the feedback received from practitioners and revised the MLOps framework and maturity model to confirm its effectiveness. Additionally, we develop an MLOps taxonomy for classifying ML use cases based on their context and requirements into the desired stage of the MLOps framework and maturity model.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>The findings provide companies with a structured approach to adopt, assess, and further advance the adoption of MLOps practices regardless of their current status.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54983,"journal":{"name":"Information and Software Technology","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 107725"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An empirical guide to MLOps adoption: Framework, maturity model and taxonomy\",\"authors\":\"Meenu Mary John ,&nbsp;Helena Holmström Olsson ,&nbsp;Jan Bosch\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.infsof.2025.107725\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Context:</h3><div>Machine Learning Operations (MLOps) has become a top priority for companies. However, its adoption has become challenging due to the need for proper guidance and awareness. Most of the MLOps solutions available in the market are designed to fit the specific platform, tools and culture of the providers.</div></div><div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>The objective is to develop a structured approach to adopting, assessing and advancing MLOps adoption.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>The study was conducted based on a multi-case study across fourteen companies.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>We provide a comprehensive analysis that highlights the similarities and differences in the adoption of MLOps practices among companies. We have also empirically validated the developed MLOps framework and MLOps maturity model. Furthermore, we carefully reviewed the feedback received from practitioners and revised the MLOps framework and maturity model to confirm its effectiveness. Additionally, we develop an MLOps taxonomy for classifying ML use cases based on their context and requirements into the desired stage of the MLOps framework and maturity model.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>The findings provide companies with a structured approach to adopt, assess, and further advance the adoption of MLOps practices regardless of their current status.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information and Software Technology\",\"volume\":\"183 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107725\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information and Software Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584925000643\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Software Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584925000643","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:机器学习操作(MLOps)已经成为公司的首要任务。然而,由于需要适当的指导和认识,它的采用变得具有挑战性。市场上大多数MLOps解决方案都是针对特定平台、工具和供应商文化而设计的。目标:目标是开发一种采用、评估和推进MLOps采用的结构化方法。方法:对14家公司进行多案例研究。结果:我们提供了一个全面的分析,突出了公司之间采用MLOps实践的异同。我们还对开发的MLOps框架和MLOps成熟度模型进行了实证验证。此外,我们仔细审查了从从业者那里收到的反馈,并修订了MLOps框架和成熟度模型,以确认其有效性。此外,我们开发了一个MLOps分类法,用于根据ML用例的上下文和需求将它们分类到MLOps框架和成熟度模型的所需阶段。结论:研究结果为公司提供了一种结构化的方法来采用、评估和进一步推进MLOps实践的采用,而不管其现状如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

An empirical guide to MLOps adoption: Framework, maturity model and taxonomy

An empirical guide to MLOps adoption: Framework, maturity model and taxonomy

Context:

Machine Learning Operations (MLOps) has become a top priority for companies. However, its adoption has become challenging due to the need for proper guidance and awareness. Most of the MLOps solutions available in the market are designed to fit the specific platform, tools and culture of the providers.

Objective:

The objective is to develop a structured approach to adopting, assessing and advancing MLOps adoption.

Methods:

The study was conducted based on a multi-case study across fourteen companies.

Results:

We provide a comprehensive analysis that highlights the similarities and differences in the adoption of MLOps practices among companies. We have also empirically validated the developed MLOps framework and MLOps maturity model. Furthermore, we carefully reviewed the feedback received from practitioners and revised the MLOps framework and maturity model to confirm its effectiveness. Additionally, we develop an MLOps taxonomy for classifying ML use cases based on their context and requirements into the desired stage of the MLOps framework and maturity model.

Conclusion:

The findings provide companies with a structured approach to adopt, assess, and further advance the adoption of MLOps practices regardless of their current status.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information and Software Technology
Information and Software Technology 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
审稿时长
9.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Information and Software Technology is the international archival journal focusing on research and experience that contributes to the improvement of software development practices. The journal''s scope includes methods and techniques to better engineer software and manage its development. Articles submitted for review should have a clear component of software engineering or address ways to improve the engineering and management of software development. Areas covered by the journal include: • Software management, quality and metrics, • Software processes, • Software architecture, modelling, specification, design and programming • Functional and non-functional software requirements • Software testing and verification & validation • Empirical studies of all aspects of engineering and managing software development Short Communications is a new section dedicated to short papers addressing new ideas, controversial opinions, "Negative" results and much more. Read the Guide for authors for more information. The journal encourages and welcomes submissions of systematic literature studies (reviews and maps) within the scope of the journal. Information and Software Technology is the premiere outlet for systematic literature studies in software engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信