摄食方式对吉富罗非鱼和大口黑鲈生长、免疫及肠道菌群的影响

IF 3.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 FISHERIES
Yuning Wang , Rui Wang , Ruiyi Yang , Shaoyu Zhu , Feng Yao , Xiaohua Zhang , Yanou Yang
{"title":"摄食方式对吉富罗非鱼和大口黑鲈生长、免疫及肠道菌群的影响","authors":"Yuning Wang ,&nbsp;Rui Wang ,&nbsp;Ruiyi Yang ,&nbsp;Shaoyu Zhu ,&nbsp;Feng Yao ,&nbsp;Xiaohua Zhang ,&nbsp;Yanou Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.aqrep.2025.102764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The omnivorous GIFT tilapia (Genetically Improved Farmed Tilapia (<em>Oreochromis niloticus</em>)) and carnivorous largemouth bass (<em>Micropterus salmoides</em>) were fed in four feeding patterns to compare the compensatory growth for fish species with different feeding habits. These patterns included satiation (control, fed twice a day at satiation), fasting 2 d and re-feeding 8 d and cycling (the daily feeding pattern is the same as that of the control group, the same below), fasting 4 d and re-feeding 16 d and cycling (both cyclical fasting), feeding once every 10 d then 10 d on satiation and cycling (cyclical food restriction), and each pattern is 60 d. The results showed that both fish species failed to obtain compensatory growth during the cyclical fasting. However, both species obtained completely compensatory growth by significantly improving actual feeding rate and feed efficiency ratio during the cyclical food restriction. During the feeding pattern, GIFT tilapia had significantly higher amylase activity, liver and muscle glycogen contents, and significantly lower blood glucose and serum insulin contents. Largemouth bass had significantly higher protease and lipase activities, and lower blood glucose content. Both species had significantly lower relative expression levels of pro-inflammatory factors in livers; GIFT tilapia had significantly lower and largemouth bass had significantly higher anti-inflammatory factors. Furthermore, GIFT tilapia had significantly higher relative abundance of harmful bacteria and lower relative abundance of beneficial bacteria, and intestinal immunity was impaired; largemouth bass changed the opposite, and intestinal immunity was improved. The results suggest that GIFT tilapia improved their carbohydrate utilization efficiency and largemouth bass improved their protein utilization efficiency, in cyclical food restriction, and the two species achieved completely compensatory growth, but GIFT tilapia impaired immunity, and largemouth bass improved immunity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8103,"journal":{"name":"Aquaculture Reports","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 102764"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of feeding pattern on growth, immunity and intestinal flora of GIFT tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides)\",\"authors\":\"Yuning Wang ,&nbsp;Rui Wang ,&nbsp;Ruiyi Yang ,&nbsp;Shaoyu Zhu ,&nbsp;Feng Yao ,&nbsp;Xiaohua Zhang ,&nbsp;Yanou Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aqrep.2025.102764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The omnivorous GIFT tilapia (Genetically Improved Farmed Tilapia (<em>Oreochromis niloticus</em>)) and carnivorous largemouth bass (<em>Micropterus salmoides</em>) were fed in four feeding patterns to compare the compensatory growth for fish species with different feeding habits. These patterns included satiation (control, fed twice a day at satiation), fasting 2 d and re-feeding 8 d and cycling (the daily feeding pattern is the same as that of the control group, the same below), fasting 4 d and re-feeding 16 d and cycling (both cyclical fasting), feeding once every 10 d then 10 d on satiation and cycling (cyclical food restriction), and each pattern is 60 d. The results showed that both fish species failed to obtain compensatory growth during the cyclical fasting. However, both species obtained completely compensatory growth by significantly improving actual feeding rate and feed efficiency ratio during the cyclical food restriction. During the feeding pattern, GIFT tilapia had significantly higher amylase activity, liver and muscle glycogen contents, and significantly lower blood glucose and serum insulin contents. Largemouth bass had significantly higher protease and lipase activities, and lower blood glucose content. Both species had significantly lower relative expression levels of pro-inflammatory factors in livers; GIFT tilapia had significantly lower and largemouth bass had significantly higher anti-inflammatory factors. Furthermore, GIFT tilapia had significantly higher relative abundance of harmful bacteria and lower relative abundance of beneficial bacteria, and intestinal immunity was impaired; largemouth bass changed the opposite, and intestinal immunity was improved. The results suggest that GIFT tilapia improved their carbohydrate utilization efficiency and largemouth bass improved their protein utilization efficiency, in cyclical food restriction, and the two species achieved completely compensatory growth, but GIFT tilapia impaired immunity, and largemouth bass improved immunity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aquaculture Reports\",\"volume\":\"42 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102764\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aquaculture Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352513425001504\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquaculture Reports","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352513425001504","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用四种摄食方式分别饲养杂食性吉富罗非鱼和肉食性大口黑鲈,比较不同摄食习性鱼类的代偿生长情况。这些模式包括满足(控制,美联储在饱食一天两次),禁食2 d和re-feeding 8 d和骑自行车(日常喂养模式是一样的对照组,下同),禁食4 d和re-feeding 16 d和自行车(包括周期性禁食)、喂养每隔10 d然后10 d饱满和骑自行车(周期性食品限制),和每个模式是60 d。结果表明,鱼类未能获得补偿性增长在周期性禁食。但在周期性限食期间,两种鱼均通过显著提高实际摄食率和饲料效率获得了完全代偿性生长。在饲喂过程中,GIFT罗非鱼的淀粉酶活性、肝糖和肌糖原含量显著提高,血糖和血清胰岛素含量显著降低。黑鲈的蛋白酶和脂肪酶活性显著升高,血糖含量显著降低。两种动物肝脏中促炎因子的相对表达水平均显著降低;GIFT罗非鱼抗炎因子显著降低,大口黑鲈抗炎因子显著升高。GIFT罗非鱼有害菌相对丰度显著高于有益菌相对丰度,肠道免疫功能受损;大口黑鲈则相反,肠道免疫力提高。结果表明,在周期性食物限制条件下,GIFT罗非鱼提高了碳水化合物利用效率,大口黑鲈提高了蛋白质利用效率,两种鱼类实现了完全的代偿生长,但GIFT罗非鱼损害了免疫力,大口黑鲈提高了免疫力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of feeding pattern on growth, immunity and intestinal flora of GIFT tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides)
The omnivorous GIFT tilapia (Genetically Improved Farmed Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)) and carnivorous largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) were fed in four feeding patterns to compare the compensatory growth for fish species with different feeding habits. These patterns included satiation (control, fed twice a day at satiation), fasting 2 d and re-feeding 8 d and cycling (the daily feeding pattern is the same as that of the control group, the same below), fasting 4 d and re-feeding 16 d and cycling (both cyclical fasting), feeding once every 10 d then 10 d on satiation and cycling (cyclical food restriction), and each pattern is 60 d. The results showed that both fish species failed to obtain compensatory growth during the cyclical fasting. However, both species obtained completely compensatory growth by significantly improving actual feeding rate and feed efficiency ratio during the cyclical food restriction. During the feeding pattern, GIFT tilapia had significantly higher amylase activity, liver and muscle glycogen contents, and significantly lower blood glucose and serum insulin contents. Largemouth bass had significantly higher protease and lipase activities, and lower blood glucose content. Both species had significantly lower relative expression levels of pro-inflammatory factors in livers; GIFT tilapia had significantly lower and largemouth bass had significantly higher anti-inflammatory factors. Furthermore, GIFT tilapia had significantly higher relative abundance of harmful bacteria and lower relative abundance of beneficial bacteria, and intestinal immunity was impaired; largemouth bass changed the opposite, and intestinal immunity was improved. The results suggest that GIFT tilapia improved their carbohydrate utilization efficiency and largemouth bass improved their protein utilization efficiency, in cyclical food restriction, and the two species achieved completely compensatory growth, but GIFT tilapia impaired immunity, and largemouth bass improved immunity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aquaculture Reports
Aquaculture Reports Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
8.10%
发文量
469
审稿时长
77 days
期刊介绍: Aquaculture Reports will publish original research papers and reviews documenting outstanding science with a regional context and focus, answering the need for high quality information on novel species, systems and regions in emerging areas of aquaculture research and development, such as integrated multi-trophic aquaculture, urban aquaculture, ornamental, unfed aquaculture, offshore aquaculture and others. Papers having industry research as priority and encompassing product development research or current industry practice are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信