Xinxin Fu , Zhenhong Li , Jiahao Ma , Meiling Zhou , Lili Chen , Jianbing Peng
{"title":"中国林业生态工程区域植被绿化率与恢复力差异趋势","authors":"Xinxin Fu , Zhenhong Li , Jiahao Ma , Meiling Zhou , Lili Chen , Jianbing Peng","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Significant greening has occurred in China's Forestry Ecological Engineering (FEE) regions in recent decades, driven by carbon dioxide fertilization and ecological restoration efforts. However, whether widespread greening enhances resilience and what factors drive its changes remain uncertain. To address these issues, we used long-term remote sensing vegetation indices from 1982 to 2022 to evaluate theoretical resilience based on lag-1 autocorrelation, variance, and skewness. We then examined the spatiotemporal coherence between greenness and resilience and conducted an attribution analysis of resilience changes in greening regions. The findings reveal that most regions in FEE areas exhibited a significant greening trend over the past 41 years. However, the substantial increase in vegetation greenness did not result in a corresponding improvement in resilience. Climate variability and long-term trends emerge as the primary drivers of resilience changes in greening areas. Notably, although vegetation greening may not be the primary factor driving changes in resilience, it could potentially mitigate or amplify the influence of climate on resilience. This work underscores the limitation of assessments predicated solely on superficial ecological conditions and advocates for integrating ecological resilience metrics into the appraisal of ecological engineering efficacy. Moreover, in ecological restoration, it is essential to consider regional climate conditions and vegetation scale to prevent competition for resources crucial to existing flora.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 107614"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Divergent trends in vegetation greenness and resilience across China's forestry ecological engineering regions\",\"authors\":\"Xinxin Fu , Zhenhong Li , Jiahao Ma , Meiling Zhou , Lili Chen , Jianbing Peng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Significant greening has occurred in China's Forestry Ecological Engineering (FEE) regions in recent decades, driven by carbon dioxide fertilization and ecological restoration efforts. However, whether widespread greening enhances resilience and what factors drive its changes remain uncertain. To address these issues, we used long-term remote sensing vegetation indices from 1982 to 2022 to evaluate theoretical resilience based on lag-1 autocorrelation, variance, and skewness. We then examined the spatiotemporal coherence between greenness and resilience and conducted an attribution analysis of resilience changes in greening regions. The findings reveal that most regions in FEE areas exhibited a significant greening trend over the past 41 years. However, the substantial increase in vegetation greenness did not result in a corresponding improvement in resilience. Climate variability and long-term trends emerge as the primary drivers of resilience changes in greening areas. Notably, although vegetation greening may not be the primary factor driving changes in resilience, it could potentially mitigate or amplify the influence of climate on resilience. This work underscores the limitation of assessments predicated solely on superficial ecological conditions and advocates for integrating ecological resilience metrics into the appraisal of ecological engineering efficacy. Moreover, in ecological restoration, it is essential to consider regional climate conditions and vegetation scale to prevent competition for resources crucial to existing flora.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"215 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107614\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001028\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001028","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Divergent trends in vegetation greenness and resilience across China's forestry ecological engineering regions
Significant greening has occurred in China's Forestry Ecological Engineering (FEE) regions in recent decades, driven by carbon dioxide fertilization and ecological restoration efforts. However, whether widespread greening enhances resilience and what factors drive its changes remain uncertain. To address these issues, we used long-term remote sensing vegetation indices from 1982 to 2022 to evaluate theoretical resilience based on lag-1 autocorrelation, variance, and skewness. We then examined the spatiotemporal coherence between greenness and resilience and conducted an attribution analysis of resilience changes in greening regions. The findings reveal that most regions in FEE areas exhibited a significant greening trend over the past 41 years. However, the substantial increase in vegetation greenness did not result in a corresponding improvement in resilience. Climate variability and long-term trends emerge as the primary drivers of resilience changes in greening areas. Notably, although vegetation greening may not be the primary factor driving changes in resilience, it could potentially mitigate or amplify the influence of climate on resilience. This work underscores the limitation of assessments predicated solely on superficial ecological conditions and advocates for integrating ecological resilience metrics into the appraisal of ecological engineering efficacy. Moreover, in ecological restoration, it is essential to consider regional climate conditions and vegetation scale to prevent competition for resources crucial to existing flora.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.