中国林业生态工程区域植被绿化率与恢复力差异趋势

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Xinxin Fu , Zhenhong Li , Jiahao Ma , Meiling Zhou , Lili Chen , Jianbing Peng
{"title":"中国林业生态工程区域植被绿化率与恢复力差异趋势","authors":"Xinxin Fu ,&nbsp;Zhenhong Li ,&nbsp;Jiahao Ma ,&nbsp;Meiling Zhou ,&nbsp;Lili Chen ,&nbsp;Jianbing Peng","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Significant greening has occurred in China's Forestry Ecological Engineering (FEE) regions in recent decades, driven by carbon dioxide fertilization and ecological restoration efforts. However, whether widespread greening enhances resilience and what factors drive its changes remain uncertain. To address these issues, we used long-term remote sensing vegetation indices from 1982 to 2022 to evaluate theoretical resilience based on lag-1 autocorrelation, variance, and skewness. We then examined the spatiotemporal coherence between greenness and resilience and conducted an attribution analysis of resilience changes in greening regions. The findings reveal that most regions in FEE areas exhibited a significant greening trend over the past 41 years. However, the substantial increase in vegetation greenness did not result in a corresponding improvement in resilience. Climate variability and long-term trends emerge as the primary drivers of resilience changes in greening areas. Notably, although vegetation greening may not be the primary factor driving changes in resilience, it could potentially mitigate or amplify the influence of climate on resilience. This work underscores the limitation of assessments predicated solely on superficial ecological conditions and advocates for integrating ecological resilience metrics into the appraisal of ecological engineering efficacy. Moreover, in ecological restoration, it is essential to consider regional climate conditions and vegetation scale to prevent competition for resources crucial to existing flora.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 107614"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Divergent trends in vegetation greenness and resilience across China's forestry ecological engineering regions\",\"authors\":\"Xinxin Fu ,&nbsp;Zhenhong Li ,&nbsp;Jiahao Ma ,&nbsp;Meiling Zhou ,&nbsp;Lili Chen ,&nbsp;Jianbing Peng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Significant greening has occurred in China's Forestry Ecological Engineering (FEE) regions in recent decades, driven by carbon dioxide fertilization and ecological restoration efforts. However, whether widespread greening enhances resilience and what factors drive its changes remain uncertain. To address these issues, we used long-term remote sensing vegetation indices from 1982 to 2022 to evaluate theoretical resilience based on lag-1 autocorrelation, variance, and skewness. We then examined the spatiotemporal coherence between greenness and resilience and conducted an attribution analysis of resilience changes in greening regions. The findings reveal that most regions in FEE areas exhibited a significant greening trend over the past 41 years. However, the substantial increase in vegetation greenness did not result in a corresponding improvement in resilience. Climate variability and long-term trends emerge as the primary drivers of resilience changes in greening areas. Notably, although vegetation greening may not be the primary factor driving changes in resilience, it could potentially mitigate or amplify the influence of climate on resilience. This work underscores the limitation of assessments predicated solely on superficial ecological conditions and advocates for integrating ecological resilience metrics into the appraisal of ecological engineering efficacy. Moreover, in ecological restoration, it is essential to consider regional climate conditions and vegetation scale to prevent competition for resources crucial to existing flora.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"215 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107614\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001028\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001028","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近几十年来,在二氧化碳施肥和生态修复的推动下,中国林业生态工程区域出现了显著的绿化。然而,广泛的绿化是否增强了恢复力以及驱动其变化的因素仍然不确定。为了解决这些问题,我们使用1982 - 2022年的长期遥感植被指数来评估基于lag-1自相关、方差和偏度的理论恢复力。在此基础上,研究了绿化与恢复力的时空一致性,并对绿化区恢复力变化进行了归因分析。结果表明,近41年来,我区大部分地区呈现出明显的绿化趋势。然而,植被绿度的大幅增加并没有带来相应的恢复力的提高。气候变率和长期趋势是绿化地区恢复力变化的主要驱动因素。值得注意的是,虽然植被绿化可能不是驱动恢复力变化的主要因素,但它可能会减轻或放大气候对恢复力的影响。这项工作强调了仅基于表面生态条件的评估的局限性,并主张将生态恢复力指标纳入生态工程功效的评估中。此外,在生态恢复中,必须考虑区域气候条件和植被规模,以防止对现有植物群至关重要的资源的竞争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Divergent trends in vegetation greenness and resilience across China's forestry ecological engineering regions
Significant greening has occurred in China's Forestry Ecological Engineering (FEE) regions in recent decades, driven by carbon dioxide fertilization and ecological restoration efforts. However, whether widespread greening enhances resilience and what factors drive its changes remain uncertain. To address these issues, we used long-term remote sensing vegetation indices from 1982 to 2022 to evaluate theoretical resilience based on lag-1 autocorrelation, variance, and skewness. We then examined the spatiotemporal coherence between greenness and resilience and conducted an attribution analysis of resilience changes in greening regions. The findings reveal that most regions in FEE areas exhibited a significant greening trend over the past 41 years. However, the substantial increase in vegetation greenness did not result in a corresponding improvement in resilience. Climate variability and long-term trends emerge as the primary drivers of resilience changes in greening areas. Notably, although vegetation greening may not be the primary factor driving changes in resilience, it could potentially mitigate or amplify the influence of climate on resilience. This work underscores the limitation of assessments predicated solely on superficial ecological conditions and advocates for integrating ecological resilience metrics into the appraisal of ecological engineering efficacy. Moreover, in ecological restoration, it is essential to consider regional climate conditions and vegetation scale to prevent competition for resources crucial to existing flora.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信