伊立替康脂质体治疗胆道癌患者:NIFTY和NALIRICC试验的汇总分析

IF 26.8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Changhoon Yoo, Anna Saborowski, Jaewon Hyung, Patrick Wenzel, Ilhwan Kim, Henning Wege, Kyu-pyo Kim, Gunnar Folprecht, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Phillip Schütt, Jaekyung Cheon, Thorsten Götze, Hyewon Ryu, Ji Sung Lee, Arndt Vogel
{"title":"伊立替康脂质体治疗胆道癌患者:NIFTY和NALIRICC试验的汇总分析","authors":"Changhoon Yoo, Anna Saborowski, Jaewon Hyung, Patrick Wenzel, Ilhwan Kim, Henning Wege, Kyu-pyo Kim, Gunnar Folprecht, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Phillip Schütt, Jaekyung Cheon, Thorsten Götze, Hyewon Ryu, Ji Sung Lee, Arndt Vogel","doi":"10.1016/j.jhep.2025.03.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background &amp; Aim</h3>Liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) combined with fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) as a second-line treatment for biliary tract cancer (BTC) following progression on gemcitabine-based therapy in the Korean NIFTY and German NALIRICC trials yielded conflicting outcomes. This necessitated a comprehensive pooled analysis to evaluate its efficacy and safety.<h3>Methods</h3>Individual patient data were pooled from the intention-to-treat populations of the NIFTY and NALIRICC trials. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).<h3>Results</h3>A total of 278 patients were included: 137 in the nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group and 141 in the 5-FU/LV group. The nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group showed significantly longer median PFS (3.6 months [95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7–4.4] vs 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.5–2.6), hazard ratio [HR) 0.65, p&lt;0.001). Median overall survival was 8.1 months (95% CI, 6.0–8.9) and 6.1 months (95% CI, 5.3–7.5), respectively (HR 0.77, p=0.051). Overall response rates (ORR) was also higher in the nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group (17.5% vs 2.8%; p&lt;0.001) than in the 5-FU/LV group. Post-study irinotecan-containing therapy was administered in 4 (2.9%) and 21 (15.3%) patients in the nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group and 5-FU/LV group, respectively. Adverse events varied by ethnicity, with gastrointestinal toxicities more common in Germans and neutropenia more prevalent in Koreans; treatment discontinuation without disease progression was 31.3% vs 8.0%, respectively.<h3>Conclusion</h3>The addition of nal-IRI to 5-FU/LV significantly improved PFS and ORR, supporting its potential as subsequent-line therapy. Differences in safety profiles underscore the relevance of ethnicity for nal-IRI in patients with BTC.<h3>Impact and implications</h3>Current standard of care for second-line therapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) is FOLFOX. This study provides robust evidence supporting the potential role of additional liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) to fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) as a subsequent therapy for patients with BTC who have progressed on gemcitabine-based regimens. The findings demonstrate significant improvements in progression-free survival and overall response rates, emphasizing its potential to address the limited treatment options in this patient population. Furthermore, the study underscores the necessity of considering ethnic differences in adverse event profiles to optimize treatment administration and patient outcomes.<h3>Clinical Trial Registration number</h3>NCT03524508 and NCT03043547","PeriodicalId":15888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepatology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":26.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liposomal irinotecan for previously treated patients with biliary tract cancer: A pooled analysis of NIFTY and NALIRICC trials\",\"authors\":\"Changhoon Yoo, Anna Saborowski, Jaewon Hyung, Patrick Wenzel, Ilhwan Kim, Henning Wege, Kyu-pyo Kim, Gunnar Folprecht, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Phillip Schütt, Jaekyung Cheon, Thorsten Götze, Hyewon Ryu, Ji Sung Lee, Arndt Vogel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhep.2025.03.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Background &amp; Aim</h3>Liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) combined with fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) as a second-line treatment for biliary tract cancer (BTC) following progression on gemcitabine-based therapy in the Korean NIFTY and German NALIRICC trials yielded conflicting outcomes. This necessitated a comprehensive pooled analysis to evaluate its efficacy and safety.<h3>Methods</h3>Individual patient data were pooled from the intention-to-treat populations of the NIFTY and NALIRICC trials. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).<h3>Results</h3>A total of 278 patients were included: 137 in the nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group and 141 in the 5-FU/LV group. The nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group showed significantly longer median PFS (3.6 months [95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7–4.4] vs 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.5–2.6), hazard ratio [HR) 0.65, p&lt;0.001). Median overall survival was 8.1 months (95% CI, 6.0–8.9) and 6.1 months (95% CI, 5.3–7.5), respectively (HR 0.77, p=0.051). Overall response rates (ORR) was also higher in the nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group (17.5% vs 2.8%; p&lt;0.001) than in the 5-FU/LV group. Post-study irinotecan-containing therapy was administered in 4 (2.9%) and 21 (15.3%) patients in the nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group and 5-FU/LV group, respectively. Adverse events varied by ethnicity, with gastrointestinal toxicities more common in Germans and neutropenia more prevalent in Koreans; treatment discontinuation without disease progression was 31.3% vs 8.0%, respectively.<h3>Conclusion</h3>The addition of nal-IRI to 5-FU/LV significantly improved PFS and ORR, supporting its potential as subsequent-line therapy. Differences in safety profiles underscore the relevance of ethnicity for nal-IRI in patients with BTC.<h3>Impact and implications</h3>Current standard of care for second-line therapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) is FOLFOX. This study provides robust evidence supporting the potential role of additional liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) to fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) as a subsequent therapy for patients with BTC who have progressed on gemcitabine-based regimens. The findings demonstrate significant improvements in progression-free survival and overall response rates, emphasizing its potential to address the limited treatment options in this patient population. Furthermore, the study underscores the necessity of considering ethnic differences in adverse event profiles to optimize treatment administration and patient outcomes.<h3>Clinical Trial Registration number</h3>NCT03524508 and NCT03043547\",\"PeriodicalId\":15888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hepatology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":26.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2025.03.013\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2025.03.013","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景,在韩国NIFTY和德国NALIRICC试验中,伊立替康(nal-IRI)脂体联合氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)/亚叶酸蛋白(LV)作为胆道癌(BTC)的二线治疗,在吉西他滨治疗进展后,结果相互矛盾。因此有必要进行综合分析来评估其有效性和安全性。方法从NIFTY和NALIRICC试验的意向治疗人群中收集个体患者数据。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS)。结果共纳入278例患者:nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV组137例,5-FU/LV组141例。nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV组的中位PFS明显更长(3.6个月[95%可信区间[CI], 2.7-4.4] vs 1.8个月(95% CI, 1.5-2.6),风险比[HR] 0.65, p<0.001)。中位总生存期分别为8.1个月(95% CI, 6.0-8.9)和6.1个月(95% CI, 5.3-7.5) (HR 0.77, p=0.051)。nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV组的总缓解率(ORR)也更高(17.5% vs 2.8%;p<0.001)高于5-FU/LV组。在nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV组和5-FU/LV组中,分别有4例(2.9%)和21例(15.3%)患者接受了含伊立替康的研究后治疗。不良事件因种族而异,胃肠道毒性在德国人更常见,中性粒细胞减少症在韩国人更普遍;无疾病进展而停止治疗的比例分别为31.3%和8.0%。结论在5-FU/LV中加入nal-IRI可显著改善PFS和ORR,支持其作为后续治疗的潜力。安全性的差异强调了BTC患者的nal-IRI与种族的相关性。影响和意义目前晚期胆道癌(BTC)患者二线治疗的护理标准是FOLFOX。这项研究提供了强有力的证据,支持额外的伊立替康脂质体(nal-IRI)对氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸蛋白(5-FU/LV)的潜在作用,作为吉西他滨基础方案进展的BTC患者的后续治疗。研究结果表明,在无进展生存期和总体缓解率方面有显著改善,强调了其解决该患者群体有限治疗选择的潜力。此外,该研究强调了考虑不良事件概况的种族差异以优化治疗管理和患者结果的必要性。临床试验注册号:nct03524508和NCT03043547
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Liposomal irinotecan for previously treated patients with biliary tract cancer: A pooled analysis of NIFTY and NALIRICC trials

Liposomal irinotecan for previously treated patients with biliary tract cancer: A pooled analysis of NIFTY and NALIRICC trials

Background & Aim

Liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) combined with fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) as a second-line treatment for biliary tract cancer (BTC) following progression on gemcitabine-based therapy in the Korean NIFTY and German NALIRICC trials yielded conflicting outcomes. This necessitated a comprehensive pooled analysis to evaluate its efficacy and safety.

Methods

Individual patient data were pooled from the intention-to-treat populations of the NIFTY and NALIRICC trials. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

A total of 278 patients were included: 137 in the nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group and 141 in the 5-FU/LV group. The nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group showed significantly longer median PFS (3.6 months [95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7–4.4] vs 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.5–2.6), hazard ratio [HR) 0.65, p<0.001). Median overall survival was 8.1 months (95% CI, 6.0–8.9) and 6.1 months (95% CI, 5.3–7.5), respectively (HR 0.77, p=0.051). Overall response rates (ORR) was also higher in the nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group (17.5% vs 2.8%; p<0.001) than in the 5-FU/LV group. Post-study irinotecan-containing therapy was administered in 4 (2.9%) and 21 (15.3%) patients in the nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group and 5-FU/LV group, respectively. Adverse events varied by ethnicity, with gastrointestinal toxicities more common in Germans and neutropenia more prevalent in Koreans; treatment discontinuation without disease progression was 31.3% vs 8.0%, respectively.

Conclusion

The addition of nal-IRI to 5-FU/LV significantly improved PFS and ORR, supporting its potential as subsequent-line therapy. Differences in safety profiles underscore the relevance of ethnicity for nal-IRI in patients with BTC.

Impact and implications

Current standard of care for second-line therapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) is FOLFOX. This study provides robust evidence supporting the potential role of additional liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) to fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) as a subsequent therapy for patients with BTC who have progressed on gemcitabine-based regimens. The findings demonstrate significant improvements in progression-free survival and overall response rates, emphasizing its potential to address the limited treatment options in this patient population. Furthermore, the study underscores the necessity of considering ethnic differences in adverse event profiles to optimize treatment administration and patient outcomes.

Clinical Trial Registration number

NCT03524508 and NCT03043547
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hepatology
Journal of Hepatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
46.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
2325
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hepatology is the official publication of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL). It is dedicated to presenting clinical and basic research in the field of hepatology through original papers, reviews, case reports, and letters to the Editor. The Journal is published in English and may consider supplements that pass an editorial review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信