健康的社会决定因素在接受性别确认面部手术中的作用。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Laryngoscope Pub Date : 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1002/lary.32129
Ivy Tran, Nina Patel, Rohith M Bhethanabotla, Aarti Agarwal, P Daniel Knott, Andrea M Park
{"title":"健康的社会决定因素在接受性别确认面部手术中的作用。","authors":"Ivy Tran, Nina Patel, Rohith M Bhethanabotla, Aarti Agarwal, P Daniel Knott, Andrea M Park","doi":"10.1002/lary.32129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigates the role of social determinants of health (SDOH) in accessing gender-affirming facial surgery (GFS) at a single tertiary care institution. By examining the demographic, socioeconomic, and health profiles of patients, this study seeks to characterize barriers in pursuing GFS and identify possible areas for growth in providing equitable care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods approach was employed, including a retrospective chart review of all previous GFS patients at a single institution and semi-structured interviews. Data collected in the chart review included demographic, surgical, and socioeconomic characteristics of the patient population. Two researchers performed inductive analysis of the interview transcripts to ensure cross-coder reliability and to identify key themes and subthemes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 142 patients met the inclusion criteria for chart review. Findings from the chart review indicated that this patient population predominantly identified as White (37.3%), female (92.3%), publicly insured (73.9%), and demonstrated a high prevalence of depression (55.6%), anxiety (43.7%), and PTSD (23.2%). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 patients. Key barriers in pursuing GFS identified in the interviews included insurance coverage concerns, logistical hurdles in scheduling GFS, and social stigma, while protective factors included support from loved ones and trans-friendly healthcare providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the critical influence that SDOH have on GFS access, particularly emphasizing the need for more supportive healthcare policies, accessible mental health resources, and more comprehensive patient and provider education. Addressing these barriers driven by SDOH can improve GFS access for gender-diverse individuals.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3.</p>","PeriodicalId":49921,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of Social Determinants of Health in Accessing Gender-Affirming Facial Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Ivy Tran, Nina Patel, Rohith M Bhethanabotla, Aarti Agarwal, P Daniel Knott, Andrea M Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lary.32129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigates the role of social determinants of health (SDOH) in accessing gender-affirming facial surgery (GFS) at a single tertiary care institution. By examining the demographic, socioeconomic, and health profiles of patients, this study seeks to characterize barriers in pursuing GFS and identify possible areas for growth in providing equitable care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods approach was employed, including a retrospective chart review of all previous GFS patients at a single institution and semi-structured interviews. Data collected in the chart review included demographic, surgical, and socioeconomic characteristics of the patient population. Two researchers performed inductive analysis of the interview transcripts to ensure cross-coder reliability and to identify key themes and subthemes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 142 patients met the inclusion criteria for chart review. Findings from the chart review indicated that this patient population predominantly identified as White (37.3%), female (92.3%), publicly insured (73.9%), and demonstrated a high prevalence of depression (55.6%), anxiety (43.7%), and PTSD (23.2%). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 patients. Key barriers in pursuing GFS identified in the interviews included insurance coverage concerns, logistical hurdles in scheduling GFS, and social stigma, while protective factors included support from loved ones and trans-friendly healthcare providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the critical influence that SDOH have on GFS access, particularly emphasizing the need for more supportive healthcare policies, accessible mental health resources, and more comprehensive patient and provider education. Addressing these barriers driven by SDOH can improve GFS access for gender-diverse individuals.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laryngoscope\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laryngoscope\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.32129\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.32129","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究调查了健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)在一家三级医疗机构接受性别确认面部手术(GFS)中的作用。通过对患者的人口、社会经济和健康状况进行调查,本研究旨在了解患者在接受 GFS 时遇到的障碍,并确定在提供公平医疗服务方面可能存在的发展领域:本研究采用了一种混合方法,包括对一家医疗机构以往所有普通外科手术患者的病历回顾和半结构化访谈。病历回顾中收集的数据包括患者的人口、手术和社会经济特征。两名研究人员对访谈记录进行了归纳分析,以确保交叉编码的可靠性,并确定关键主题和次主题:共有 142 名患者符合病历审查的纳入标准。病历审查结果显示,这些患者主要为白人(37.3%)、女性(92.3%)、有公共保险(73.9%),抑郁症(55.6%)、焦虑症(43.7%)和创伤后应激障碍(23.2%)的发病率较高。对 11 名患者进行了半结构化访谈。访谈中发现,进行 GFS 的主要障碍包括保险覆盖问题、安排 GFS 的后勤障碍和社会耻辱感,而保护因素包括亲人的支持和对变性者友好的医疗服务提供者:本研究强调了 SDOH 对获得 GFS 的关键影响,尤其强调了需要更多的支持性医疗保健政策、可获得的心理健康资源以及更全面的患者和医疗服务提供者教育。解决这些由 SDOH 引发的障碍可以改善性别多样化人群获得 GFS 的机会:证据等级:3 级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Role of Social Determinants of Health in Accessing Gender-Affirming Facial Surgery.

Objectives: This study investigates the role of social determinants of health (SDOH) in accessing gender-affirming facial surgery (GFS) at a single tertiary care institution. By examining the demographic, socioeconomic, and health profiles of patients, this study seeks to characterize barriers in pursuing GFS and identify possible areas for growth in providing equitable care.

Methods: A mixed-methods approach was employed, including a retrospective chart review of all previous GFS patients at a single institution and semi-structured interviews. Data collected in the chart review included demographic, surgical, and socioeconomic characteristics of the patient population. Two researchers performed inductive analysis of the interview transcripts to ensure cross-coder reliability and to identify key themes and subthemes.

Results: A total of 142 patients met the inclusion criteria for chart review. Findings from the chart review indicated that this patient population predominantly identified as White (37.3%), female (92.3%), publicly insured (73.9%), and demonstrated a high prevalence of depression (55.6%), anxiety (43.7%), and PTSD (23.2%). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 patients. Key barriers in pursuing GFS identified in the interviews included insurance coverage concerns, logistical hurdles in scheduling GFS, and social stigma, while protective factors included support from loved ones and trans-friendly healthcare providers.

Conclusion: This study highlights the critical influence that SDOH have on GFS access, particularly emphasizing the need for more supportive healthcare policies, accessible mental health resources, and more comprehensive patient and provider education. Addressing these barriers driven by SDOH can improve GFS access for gender-diverse individuals.

Level of evidence: Level 3.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Laryngoscope
Laryngoscope 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
500
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Laryngoscope has been the leading source of information on advances in the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck disorders since 1890. The Laryngoscope is the first choice among otolaryngologists for publication of their important findings and techniques. Each monthly issue of The Laryngoscope features peer-reviewed medical, clinical, and research contributions in general otolaryngology, allergy/rhinology, otology/neurotology, laryngology/bronchoesophagology, head and neck surgery, sleep medicine, pediatric otolaryngology, facial plastics and reconstructive surgery, oncology, and communicative disorders. Contributions include papers and posters presented at the Annual and Section Meetings of the Triological Society, as well as independent papers, "How I Do It", "Triological Best Practice" articles, and contemporary reviews. Theses authored by the Triological Society’s new Fellows as well as papers presented at meetings of the American Laryngological Association are published in The Laryngoscope. • Broncho-esophagology • Communicative disorders • Head and neck surgery • Plastic and reconstructive facial surgery • Oncology • Speech and hearing defects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信