Ivy Tran, Nina Patel, Rohith M Bhethanabotla, Aarti Agarwal, P Daniel Knott, Andrea M Park
{"title":"健康的社会决定因素在接受性别确认面部手术中的作用。","authors":"Ivy Tran, Nina Patel, Rohith M Bhethanabotla, Aarti Agarwal, P Daniel Knott, Andrea M Park","doi":"10.1002/lary.32129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigates the role of social determinants of health (SDOH) in accessing gender-affirming facial surgery (GFS) at a single tertiary care institution. By examining the demographic, socioeconomic, and health profiles of patients, this study seeks to characterize barriers in pursuing GFS and identify possible areas for growth in providing equitable care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods approach was employed, including a retrospective chart review of all previous GFS patients at a single institution and semi-structured interviews. Data collected in the chart review included demographic, surgical, and socioeconomic characteristics of the patient population. Two researchers performed inductive analysis of the interview transcripts to ensure cross-coder reliability and to identify key themes and subthemes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 142 patients met the inclusion criteria for chart review. Findings from the chart review indicated that this patient population predominantly identified as White (37.3%), female (92.3%), publicly insured (73.9%), and demonstrated a high prevalence of depression (55.6%), anxiety (43.7%), and PTSD (23.2%). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 patients. Key barriers in pursuing GFS identified in the interviews included insurance coverage concerns, logistical hurdles in scheduling GFS, and social stigma, while protective factors included support from loved ones and trans-friendly healthcare providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the critical influence that SDOH have on GFS access, particularly emphasizing the need for more supportive healthcare policies, accessible mental health resources, and more comprehensive patient and provider education. Addressing these barriers driven by SDOH can improve GFS access for gender-diverse individuals.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3.</p>","PeriodicalId":49921,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of Social Determinants of Health in Accessing Gender-Affirming Facial Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Ivy Tran, Nina Patel, Rohith M Bhethanabotla, Aarti Agarwal, P Daniel Knott, Andrea M Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lary.32129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigates the role of social determinants of health (SDOH) in accessing gender-affirming facial surgery (GFS) at a single tertiary care institution. By examining the demographic, socioeconomic, and health profiles of patients, this study seeks to characterize barriers in pursuing GFS and identify possible areas for growth in providing equitable care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods approach was employed, including a retrospective chart review of all previous GFS patients at a single institution and semi-structured interviews. Data collected in the chart review included demographic, surgical, and socioeconomic characteristics of the patient population. Two researchers performed inductive analysis of the interview transcripts to ensure cross-coder reliability and to identify key themes and subthemes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 142 patients met the inclusion criteria for chart review. Findings from the chart review indicated that this patient population predominantly identified as White (37.3%), female (92.3%), publicly insured (73.9%), and demonstrated a high prevalence of depression (55.6%), anxiety (43.7%), and PTSD (23.2%). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 patients. Key barriers in pursuing GFS identified in the interviews included insurance coverage concerns, logistical hurdles in scheduling GFS, and social stigma, while protective factors included support from loved ones and trans-friendly healthcare providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the critical influence that SDOH have on GFS access, particularly emphasizing the need for more supportive healthcare policies, accessible mental health resources, and more comprehensive patient and provider education. Addressing these barriers driven by SDOH can improve GFS access for gender-diverse individuals.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laryngoscope\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laryngoscope\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.32129\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.32129","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Role of Social Determinants of Health in Accessing Gender-Affirming Facial Surgery.
Objectives: This study investigates the role of social determinants of health (SDOH) in accessing gender-affirming facial surgery (GFS) at a single tertiary care institution. By examining the demographic, socioeconomic, and health profiles of patients, this study seeks to characterize barriers in pursuing GFS and identify possible areas for growth in providing equitable care.
Methods: A mixed-methods approach was employed, including a retrospective chart review of all previous GFS patients at a single institution and semi-structured interviews. Data collected in the chart review included demographic, surgical, and socioeconomic characteristics of the patient population. Two researchers performed inductive analysis of the interview transcripts to ensure cross-coder reliability and to identify key themes and subthemes.
Results: A total of 142 patients met the inclusion criteria for chart review. Findings from the chart review indicated that this patient population predominantly identified as White (37.3%), female (92.3%), publicly insured (73.9%), and demonstrated a high prevalence of depression (55.6%), anxiety (43.7%), and PTSD (23.2%). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 patients. Key barriers in pursuing GFS identified in the interviews included insurance coverage concerns, logistical hurdles in scheduling GFS, and social stigma, while protective factors included support from loved ones and trans-friendly healthcare providers.
Conclusion: This study highlights the critical influence that SDOH have on GFS access, particularly emphasizing the need for more supportive healthcare policies, accessible mental health resources, and more comprehensive patient and provider education. Addressing these barriers driven by SDOH can improve GFS access for gender-diverse individuals.
期刊介绍:
The Laryngoscope has been the leading source of information on advances in the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck disorders since 1890. The Laryngoscope is the first choice among otolaryngologists for publication of their important findings and techniques. Each monthly issue of The Laryngoscope features peer-reviewed medical, clinical, and research contributions in general otolaryngology, allergy/rhinology, otology/neurotology, laryngology/bronchoesophagology, head and neck surgery, sleep medicine, pediatric otolaryngology, facial plastics and reconstructive surgery, oncology, and communicative disorders. Contributions include papers and posters presented at the Annual and Section Meetings of the Triological Society, as well as independent papers, "How I Do It", "Triological Best Practice" articles, and contemporary reviews. Theses authored by the Triological Society’s new Fellows as well as papers presented at meetings of the American Laryngological Association are published in The Laryngoscope.
• Broncho-esophagology
• Communicative disorders
• Head and neck surgery
• Plastic and reconstructive facial surgery
• Oncology
• Speech and hearing defects