区分使用单侧下肢假肢者中的回顾性跌倒者和非跌倒者。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
M G Finco, Cody L McDonald, Sarah C Moudy
{"title":"区分使用单侧下肢假肢者中的回顾性跌倒者和非跌倒者。","authors":"M G Finco, Cody L McDonald, Sarah C Moudy","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over 52% of people who use a lower-limb prosthesis fall once every year, but fall risk is still not effectively screened. Few studies have identified clinical outcome measures that could help screen fall risk. Gait asymmetries between the intact and prosthetic limbs could also potentially help identify fall risk, based on findings in people with stroke. However, no studies have examined the relationship between gait asymmetries and falls in people who use a lower-limb prosthesis. Therefore, we sought to determine if any gait asymmetry parameters could significantly distinguish 12-month retrospective fallers from nonfallers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>People were recruited from private practice and the Amputee Coalition National Conference. Participants completed a 12-month retrospective fall history and 7 clinical outcome measures, as well as level-ground walking at self-selected pace with wearable sensors that collected kinematic (sagittal plane: hip, knee, and ankle range of motion) and kinetic (peak braking and propulsion ground reaction force) data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two individuals who use a unilateral prosthesis participated (age 57.6 ± 14.2 years; 15 transtibial, 7 transfemoral). No gait asymmetry parameters significantly distinguished 12-month retrospective fallers from nonfallers. However, the Four Square Step Test did significantly distinguish fallers from nonfallers (P = 0.040, Hedge g = -0.739, area under the curve = 0.725, CI = 50-95%, cutoff time = 13.14 s), irrespective of level of prosthesis use. No parameters significantly distinguished fallers from nonfallers by level of prosthesis use (transtibial, transfemoral).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Four Square Step Test cutoff time may be useful to distinguish fallers from nonfallers in unilateral lower-limb prosthesis users.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distinguishing retrospective fallers from nonfallers in people who use a unilateral lower-limb prosthesis.\",\"authors\":\"M G Finco, Cody L McDonald, Sarah C Moudy\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over 52% of people who use a lower-limb prosthesis fall once every year, but fall risk is still not effectively screened. Few studies have identified clinical outcome measures that could help screen fall risk. Gait asymmetries between the intact and prosthetic limbs could also potentially help identify fall risk, based on findings in people with stroke. However, no studies have examined the relationship between gait asymmetries and falls in people who use a lower-limb prosthesis. Therefore, we sought to determine if any gait asymmetry parameters could significantly distinguish 12-month retrospective fallers from nonfallers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>People were recruited from private practice and the Amputee Coalition National Conference. Participants completed a 12-month retrospective fall history and 7 clinical outcome measures, as well as level-ground walking at self-selected pace with wearable sensors that collected kinematic (sagittal plane: hip, knee, and ankle range of motion) and kinetic (peak braking and propulsion ground reaction force) data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two individuals who use a unilateral prosthesis participated (age 57.6 ± 14.2 years; 15 transtibial, 7 transfemoral). No gait asymmetry parameters significantly distinguished 12-month retrospective fallers from nonfallers. However, the Four Square Step Test did significantly distinguish fallers from nonfallers (P = 0.040, Hedge g = -0.739, area under the curve = 0.725, CI = 50-95%, cutoff time = 13.14 s), irrespective of level of prosthesis use. No parameters significantly distinguished fallers from nonfallers by level of prosthesis use (transtibial, transfemoral).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Four Square Step Test cutoff time may be useful to distinguish fallers from nonfallers in unilateral lower-limb prosthesis users.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prosthetics and Orthotics International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prosthetics and Orthotics International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000439\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000439","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用下肢假肢的人中有超过 52% 的人每年会跌倒一次,但跌倒风险仍未得到有效筛查。很少有研究确定了有助于筛查跌倒风险的临床结果指标。根据对中风患者的研究结果,完整肢体和假肢之间的步态不对称也可能有助于识别跌倒风险。然而,目前还没有研究对使用下肢假肢者的步态不对称与跌倒之间的关系进行研究。因此,我们试图确定是否有任何步态不对称性参数能显著区分12个月回顾性跌倒者和非跌倒者:方法:我们从私人诊所和截肢者联盟全国会议上招募人员。参与者完成了为期 12 个月的跌倒病史回顾和 7 项临床结果测量,以及自选步伐的平地行走,可穿戴传感器收集了运动学(矢状面:髋关节、膝关节和踝关节的运动范围)和动力学(制动和推进地面反作用力峰值)数据:22名使用单侧假肢的患者(年龄为57.6±14.2岁;15名经胫,7名经股)参加了此次研究。步态不对称参数没有明显区分12个月回顾性跌倒者和非跌倒者。然而,无论假肢使用水平如何,四方步测试都能显著区分跌倒者和非跌倒者(P = 0.040,Hedge g = -0.739,曲线下面积 = 0.725,CI = 50-95%,截止时间 = 13.14 秒)。没有参数能根据假肢使用水平(经胫、经腿)明显区分跌倒者和非跌倒者:结论:四方步测试截止时间可能有助于区分单侧下肢假肢使用者中的跌倒者和非跌倒者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distinguishing retrospective fallers from nonfallers in people who use a unilateral lower-limb prosthesis.

Background: Over 52% of people who use a lower-limb prosthesis fall once every year, but fall risk is still not effectively screened. Few studies have identified clinical outcome measures that could help screen fall risk. Gait asymmetries between the intact and prosthetic limbs could also potentially help identify fall risk, based on findings in people with stroke. However, no studies have examined the relationship between gait asymmetries and falls in people who use a lower-limb prosthesis. Therefore, we sought to determine if any gait asymmetry parameters could significantly distinguish 12-month retrospective fallers from nonfallers.

Methods: People were recruited from private practice and the Amputee Coalition National Conference. Participants completed a 12-month retrospective fall history and 7 clinical outcome measures, as well as level-ground walking at self-selected pace with wearable sensors that collected kinematic (sagittal plane: hip, knee, and ankle range of motion) and kinetic (peak braking and propulsion ground reaction force) data.

Results: Twenty-two individuals who use a unilateral prosthesis participated (age 57.6 ± 14.2 years; 15 transtibial, 7 transfemoral). No gait asymmetry parameters significantly distinguished 12-month retrospective fallers from nonfallers. However, the Four Square Step Test did significantly distinguish fallers from nonfallers (P = 0.040, Hedge g = -0.739, area under the curve = 0.725, CI = 50-95%, cutoff time = 13.14 s), irrespective of level of prosthesis use. No parameters significantly distinguished fallers from nonfallers by level of prosthesis use (transtibial, transfemoral).

Conclusions: The Four Square Step Test cutoff time may be useful to distinguish fallers from nonfallers in unilateral lower-limb prosthesis users.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Prosthetics and Orthotics International is an international, multidisciplinary journal for all professionals who have an interest in the medical, clinical, rehabilitation, technical, educational and research aspects of prosthetics, orthotics and rehabilitation engineering, as well as their related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信