学生、教职员工对高等教育中年龄包容性的看法:拓宽多样性、公平性和包容性的视野。

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Joann M Montepare, Lauren Marshall Bowen, Susan Krauss Whitbourne, Nina M Silverstein
{"title":"学生、教职员工对高等教育中年龄包容性的看法:拓宽多样性、公平性和包容性的视野。","authors":"Joann M Montepare, Lauren Marshall Bowen, Susan Krauss Whitbourne, Nina M Silverstein","doi":"10.1080/02701960.2025.2471909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in higher education seldom incorporate age-inclusive values, practices, and policies in intentional ways into ongoing programs. However, the need to advance age inclusivity across our colleges and universities has become a pressing issue for many reasons which call for extending DEI efforts. An important empirical step in this direction is identifying what students, faculty, and staff perceive about age inclusivity on their campuses. To this end, the present study conducted a qualitative analysis of responses to an open-ended question about age inclusivity by a national sample of 412 students, faculty, and staff. Four key themes emerged from their responses: 1) age inclusivity in higher education is a valuable initiative (40% of responses); 2) age inclusivity only works if enacted appropriately/thoughtfully (12%); 3) age inclusivity should not be a focus in higher education (26%); and 4) age inclusivity is an unfamiliar concept (12%). Other comments reinforced the existence of ageism on campuses. Findings from this study can help to inform why and how age-inclusive efforts can be better integrated into ongoing DEI campus efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":46431,"journal":{"name":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of Age Inclusivity in Higher Education by Students, Faculty, and Staff: Broadening the View of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.\",\"authors\":\"Joann M Montepare, Lauren Marshall Bowen, Susan Krauss Whitbourne, Nina M Silverstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02701960.2025.2471909\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in higher education seldom incorporate age-inclusive values, practices, and policies in intentional ways into ongoing programs. However, the need to advance age inclusivity across our colleges and universities has become a pressing issue for many reasons which call for extending DEI efforts. An important empirical step in this direction is identifying what students, faculty, and staff perceive about age inclusivity on their campuses. To this end, the present study conducted a qualitative analysis of responses to an open-ended question about age inclusivity by a national sample of 412 students, faculty, and staff. Four key themes emerged from their responses: 1) age inclusivity in higher education is a valuable initiative (40% of responses); 2) age inclusivity only works if enacted appropriately/thoughtfully (12%); 3) age inclusivity should not be a focus in higher education (26%); and 4) age inclusivity is an unfamiliar concept (12%). Other comments reinforced the existence of ageism on campuses. Findings from this study can help to inform why and how age-inclusive efforts can be better integrated into ongoing DEI campus efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2025.2471909\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2025.2471909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceptions of Age Inclusivity in Higher Education by Students, Faculty, and Staff: Broadening the View of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.

Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in higher education seldom incorporate age-inclusive values, practices, and policies in intentional ways into ongoing programs. However, the need to advance age inclusivity across our colleges and universities has become a pressing issue for many reasons which call for extending DEI efforts. An important empirical step in this direction is identifying what students, faculty, and staff perceive about age inclusivity on their campuses. To this end, the present study conducted a qualitative analysis of responses to an open-ended question about age inclusivity by a national sample of 412 students, faculty, and staff. Four key themes emerged from their responses: 1) age inclusivity in higher education is a valuable initiative (40% of responses); 2) age inclusivity only works if enacted appropriately/thoughtfully (12%); 3) age inclusivity should not be a focus in higher education (26%); and 4) age inclusivity is an unfamiliar concept (12%). Other comments reinforced the existence of ageism on campuses. Findings from this study can help to inform why and how age-inclusive efforts can be better integrated into ongoing DEI campus efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
18.80%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Gerontology & Geriatrics Education is geared toward the exchange of information related to research, curriculum development, course and program evaluation, classroom and practice innovation, and other topics with educational implications for gerontology and geriatrics. It is designed to appeal to a broad range of students, teachers, practitioners, administrators, and policy makers and is dedicated to improving awareness of best practices and resources for gerontologists and gerontology/geriatrics educators. Peer Review Policy: All research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by two anonymous referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信