Joann M Montepare, Lauren Marshall Bowen, Susan Krauss Whitbourne, Nina M Silverstein
{"title":"学生、教职员工对高等教育中年龄包容性的看法:拓宽多样性、公平性和包容性的视野。","authors":"Joann M Montepare, Lauren Marshall Bowen, Susan Krauss Whitbourne, Nina M Silverstein","doi":"10.1080/02701960.2025.2471909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in higher education seldom incorporate age-inclusive values, practices, and policies in intentional ways into ongoing programs. However, the need to advance age inclusivity across our colleges and universities has become a pressing issue for many reasons which call for extending DEI efforts. An important empirical step in this direction is identifying what students, faculty, and staff perceive about age inclusivity on their campuses. To this end, the present study conducted a qualitative analysis of responses to an open-ended question about age inclusivity by a national sample of 412 students, faculty, and staff. Four key themes emerged from their responses: 1) age inclusivity in higher education is a valuable initiative (40% of responses); 2) age inclusivity only works if enacted appropriately/thoughtfully (12%); 3) age inclusivity should not be a focus in higher education (26%); and 4) age inclusivity is an unfamiliar concept (12%). Other comments reinforced the existence of ageism on campuses. Findings from this study can help to inform why and how age-inclusive efforts can be better integrated into ongoing DEI campus efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":46431,"journal":{"name":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of Age Inclusivity in Higher Education by Students, Faculty, and Staff: Broadening the View of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.\",\"authors\":\"Joann M Montepare, Lauren Marshall Bowen, Susan Krauss Whitbourne, Nina M Silverstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02701960.2025.2471909\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in higher education seldom incorporate age-inclusive values, practices, and policies in intentional ways into ongoing programs. However, the need to advance age inclusivity across our colleges and universities has become a pressing issue for many reasons which call for extending DEI efforts. An important empirical step in this direction is identifying what students, faculty, and staff perceive about age inclusivity on their campuses. To this end, the present study conducted a qualitative analysis of responses to an open-ended question about age inclusivity by a national sample of 412 students, faculty, and staff. Four key themes emerged from their responses: 1) age inclusivity in higher education is a valuable initiative (40% of responses); 2) age inclusivity only works if enacted appropriately/thoughtfully (12%); 3) age inclusivity should not be a focus in higher education (26%); and 4) age inclusivity is an unfamiliar concept (12%). Other comments reinforced the existence of ageism on campuses. Findings from this study can help to inform why and how age-inclusive efforts can be better integrated into ongoing DEI campus efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2025.2471909\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2025.2471909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Perceptions of Age Inclusivity in Higher Education by Students, Faculty, and Staff: Broadening the View of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.
Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in higher education seldom incorporate age-inclusive values, practices, and policies in intentional ways into ongoing programs. However, the need to advance age inclusivity across our colleges and universities has become a pressing issue for many reasons which call for extending DEI efforts. An important empirical step in this direction is identifying what students, faculty, and staff perceive about age inclusivity on their campuses. To this end, the present study conducted a qualitative analysis of responses to an open-ended question about age inclusivity by a national sample of 412 students, faculty, and staff. Four key themes emerged from their responses: 1) age inclusivity in higher education is a valuable initiative (40% of responses); 2) age inclusivity only works if enacted appropriately/thoughtfully (12%); 3) age inclusivity should not be a focus in higher education (26%); and 4) age inclusivity is an unfamiliar concept (12%). Other comments reinforced the existence of ageism on campuses. Findings from this study can help to inform why and how age-inclusive efforts can be better integrated into ongoing DEI campus efforts.
期刊介绍:
Gerontology & Geriatrics Education is geared toward the exchange of information related to research, curriculum development, course and program evaluation, classroom and practice innovation, and other topics with educational implications for gerontology and geriatrics. It is designed to appeal to a broad range of students, teachers, practitioners, administrators, and policy makers and is dedicated to improving awareness of best practices and resources for gerontologists and gerontology/geriatrics educators. Peer Review Policy: All research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by two anonymous referees.