Murat Kars, Canan Cimsit, Yunus Emre Genc, Ece Bıcakcı, Muhammed Hasan Toper, Kamil Cam
{"title":"前列腺活检认知绘图的有效性:一项前瞻性随机研究。","authors":"Murat Kars, Canan Cimsit, Yunus Emre Genc, Ece Bıcakcı, Muhammed Hasan Toper, Kamil Cam","doi":"10.1016/j.urology.2025.03.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of adding a simple prostate mapping diagram to multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) reports, a randomised, prospective study is designed. Despite cognitive prostate biopsy is the most preferred approach among targeted biopsy methods due to its low cost and easy application, its operator dependency requires standardization to improve diagnostic accuracy for prostate cancer (PCa).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 155 patients underwent mpMRI as the standard of care and were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to two groups: prostate mapping diagram and standard group. In addition to the mpMRI reports, suspicious lesions (≥ PI-RADS 3) were drawn on a schematic diagram by a single specialized uro-radiologist in the prostate mapping group. A single experienced urologist sampled four cores from each target in addition to a twelve-core systematic biopsy in both groups. A Gleason score of 3+4 or higher was considered as clinically significant PCa (csPCa).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall cancer detection rate between the group 1 and 2 was statistically significant (57% and 35%, respectively, p=0.006). Particularly, csPCa rates among the groups were 47% (36/77) and 21% (16/78) for group 1 and group 2, respectively (p<0.001). The csPCa detection with only targeted biopsies was strikingly as high as 3-fold (17% vs 6%, p=0.048) in the mapping group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our prospective study has shown that the addition of a simple mapping strategy to mpMRI reports significantly increased cancer rates by cognitive biopsy. We strongly recommend the use of a schematic mapping diagram in biopsy protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":23415,"journal":{"name":"Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EFFECTIVENESS OF MAPPING FOR COGNITIVE PROSTATE BIOPSY: A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED STUDY.\",\"authors\":\"Murat Kars, Canan Cimsit, Yunus Emre Genc, Ece Bıcakcı, Muhammed Hasan Toper, Kamil Cam\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urology.2025.03.036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of adding a simple prostate mapping diagram to multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) reports, a randomised, prospective study is designed. Despite cognitive prostate biopsy is the most preferred approach among targeted biopsy methods due to its low cost and easy application, its operator dependency requires standardization to improve diagnostic accuracy for prostate cancer (PCa).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 155 patients underwent mpMRI as the standard of care and were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to two groups: prostate mapping diagram and standard group. In addition to the mpMRI reports, suspicious lesions (≥ PI-RADS 3) were drawn on a schematic diagram by a single specialized uro-radiologist in the prostate mapping group. A single experienced urologist sampled four cores from each target in addition to a twelve-core systematic biopsy in both groups. A Gleason score of 3+4 or higher was considered as clinically significant PCa (csPCa).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall cancer detection rate between the group 1 and 2 was statistically significant (57% and 35%, respectively, p=0.006). Particularly, csPCa rates among the groups were 47% (36/77) and 21% (16/78) for group 1 and group 2, respectively (p<0.001). The csPCa detection with only targeted biopsies was strikingly as high as 3-fold (17% vs 6%, p=0.048) in the mapping group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our prospective study has shown that the addition of a simple mapping strategy to mpMRI reports significantly increased cancer rates by cognitive biopsy. We strongly recommend the use of a schematic mapping diagram in biopsy protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2025.03.036\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2025.03.036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
EFFECTIVENESS OF MAPPING FOR COGNITIVE PROSTATE BIOPSY: A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED STUDY.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of adding a simple prostate mapping diagram to multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) reports, a randomised, prospective study is designed. Despite cognitive prostate biopsy is the most preferred approach among targeted biopsy methods due to its low cost and easy application, its operator dependency requires standardization to improve diagnostic accuracy for prostate cancer (PCa).
Methods: A total of 155 patients underwent mpMRI as the standard of care and were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to two groups: prostate mapping diagram and standard group. In addition to the mpMRI reports, suspicious lesions (≥ PI-RADS 3) were drawn on a schematic diagram by a single specialized uro-radiologist in the prostate mapping group. A single experienced urologist sampled four cores from each target in addition to a twelve-core systematic biopsy in both groups. A Gleason score of 3+4 or higher was considered as clinically significant PCa (csPCa).
Results: Overall cancer detection rate between the group 1 and 2 was statistically significant (57% and 35%, respectively, p=0.006). Particularly, csPCa rates among the groups were 47% (36/77) and 21% (16/78) for group 1 and group 2, respectively (p<0.001). The csPCa detection with only targeted biopsies was strikingly as high as 3-fold (17% vs 6%, p=0.048) in the mapping group.
Conclusions: Our prospective study has shown that the addition of a simple mapping strategy to mpMRI reports significantly increased cancer rates by cognitive biopsy. We strongly recommend the use of a schematic mapping diagram in biopsy protocols.
期刊介绍:
Urology is a monthly, peer–reviewed journal primarily for urologists, residents, interns, nephrologists, and other specialists interested in urology
The mission of Urology®, the "Gold Journal," is to provide practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers practicing the art of urology worldwide. Urology® publishes original articles relating to adult and pediatric clinical urology as well as to clinical and basic science research. Topics in Urology® include pediatrics, surgical oncology, radiology, pathology, erectile dysfunction, infertility, incontinence, transplantation, endourology, andrology, female urology, reconstructive surgery, and medical oncology, as well as relevant basic science issues. Special features include rapid communication of important timely issues, surgeon''s workshops, interesting case reports, surgical techniques, clinical and basic science review articles, guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, and historical articles in urology.