前列腺活检认知绘图的有效性:一项前瞻性随机研究。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Murat Kars, Canan Cimsit, Yunus Emre Genc, Ece Bıcakcı, Muhammed Hasan Toper, Kamil Cam
{"title":"前列腺活检认知绘图的有效性:一项前瞻性随机研究。","authors":"Murat Kars, Canan Cimsit, Yunus Emre Genc, Ece Bıcakcı, Muhammed Hasan Toper, Kamil Cam","doi":"10.1016/j.urology.2025.03.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of adding a simple prostate mapping diagram to multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) reports, a randomised, prospective study is designed. Despite cognitive prostate biopsy is the most preferred approach among targeted biopsy methods due to its low cost and easy application, its operator dependency requires standardization to improve diagnostic accuracy for prostate cancer (PCa).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 155 patients underwent mpMRI as the standard of care and were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to two groups: prostate mapping diagram and standard group. In addition to the mpMRI reports, suspicious lesions (≥ PI-RADS 3) were drawn on a schematic diagram by a single specialized uro-radiologist in the prostate mapping group. A single experienced urologist sampled four cores from each target in addition to a twelve-core systematic biopsy in both groups. A Gleason score of 3+4 or higher was considered as clinically significant PCa (csPCa).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall cancer detection rate between the group 1 and 2 was statistically significant (57% and 35%, respectively, p=0.006). Particularly, csPCa rates among the groups were 47% (36/77) and 21% (16/78) for group 1 and group 2, respectively (p<0.001). The csPCa detection with only targeted biopsies was strikingly as high as 3-fold (17% vs 6%, p=0.048) in the mapping group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our prospective study has shown that the addition of a simple mapping strategy to mpMRI reports significantly increased cancer rates by cognitive biopsy. We strongly recommend the use of a schematic mapping diagram in biopsy protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":23415,"journal":{"name":"Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EFFECTIVENESS OF MAPPING FOR COGNITIVE PROSTATE BIOPSY: A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED STUDY.\",\"authors\":\"Murat Kars, Canan Cimsit, Yunus Emre Genc, Ece Bıcakcı, Muhammed Hasan Toper, Kamil Cam\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urology.2025.03.036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of adding a simple prostate mapping diagram to multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) reports, a randomised, prospective study is designed. Despite cognitive prostate biopsy is the most preferred approach among targeted biopsy methods due to its low cost and easy application, its operator dependency requires standardization to improve diagnostic accuracy for prostate cancer (PCa).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 155 patients underwent mpMRI as the standard of care and were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to two groups: prostate mapping diagram and standard group. In addition to the mpMRI reports, suspicious lesions (≥ PI-RADS 3) were drawn on a schematic diagram by a single specialized uro-radiologist in the prostate mapping group. A single experienced urologist sampled four cores from each target in addition to a twelve-core systematic biopsy in both groups. A Gleason score of 3+4 or higher was considered as clinically significant PCa (csPCa).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall cancer detection rate between the group 1 and 2 was statistically significant (57% and 35%, respectively, p=0.006). Particularly, csPCa rates among the groups were 47% (36/77) and 21% (16/78) for group 1 and group 2, respectively (p<0.001). The csPCa detection with only targeted biopsies was strikingly as high as 3-fold (17% vs 6%, p=0.048) in the mapping group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our prospective study has shown that the addition of a simple mapping strategy to mpMRI reports significantly increased cancer rates by cognitive biopsy. We strongly recommend the use of a schematic mapping diagram in biopsy protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2025.03.036\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2025.03.036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的为了评估在多参数前列腺磁共振成像(mpMRI)报告中添加简单前列腺映射图的效果,我们设计了一项随机前瞻性研究。尽管认知前列腺活检因其成本低、应用简便而成为靶向活检方法中最受欢迎的方法,但其对操作者的依赖性需要标准化,以提高前列腺癌(PCa)的诊断准确性:共有 155 名患者接受了 mpMRI 作为标准治疗方法,并按 1:1 的比例随机分配到两组:前列腺图谱组和标准组。除了 mpMRI 报告外,前列腺图谱组的一名泌尿放射专科医生还在示意图上绘制了可疑病灶(≥ PI-RADS 3)。两组均由一名经验丰富的泌尿科医生从每个靶点取样四芯,并进行十二芯系统活检。格里森评分 3+4 或更高被视为有临床意义的 PCa(csPCa):结果:第一组和第二组的总体癌症检出率有显著统计学差异(分别为 57% 和 35%,P=0.006)。特别是,第 1 组和第 2 组的 csPCa 检出率分别为 47%(36/77)和 21%(16/78)(p 结论:我们的前瞻性研究表明,通过对癌症患者进行体格检查,可以提高癌症的检出率:我们的前瞻性研究表明,在 mpMRI 报告中加入简单的映射策略可显著提高认知活检的癌症发生率。我们强烈建议在活检方案中使用示意映射图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EFFECTIVENESS OF MAPPING FOR COGNITIVE PROSTATE BIOPSY: A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED STUDY.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of adding a simple prostate mapping diagram to multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) reports, a randomised, prospective study is designed. Despite cognitive prostate biopsy is the most preferred approach among targeted biopsy methods due to its low cost and easy application, its operator dependency requires standardization to improve diagnostic accuracy for prostate cancer (PCa).

Methods: A total of 155 patients underwent mpMRI as the standard of care and were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to two groups: prostate mapping diagram and standard group. In addition to the mpMRI reports, suspicious lesions (≥ PI-RADS 3) were drawn on a schematic diagram by a single specialized uro-radiologist in the prostate mapping group. A single experienced urologist sampled four cores from each target in addition to a twelve-core systematic biopsy in both groups. A Gleason score of 3+4 or higher was considered as clinically significant PCa (csPCa).

Results: Overall cancer detection rate between the group 1 and 2 was statistically significant (57% and 35%, respectively, p=0.006). Particularly, csPCa rates among the groups were 47% (36/77) and 21% (16/78) for group 1 and group 2, respectively (p<0.001). The csPCa detection with only targeted biopsies was strikingly as high as 3-fold (17% vs 6%, p=0.048) in the mapping group.

Conclusions: Our prospective study has shown that the addition of a simple mapping strategy to mpMRI reports significantly increased cancer rates by cognitive biopsy. We strongly recommend the use of a schematic mapping diagram in biopsy protocols.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urology
Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Urology is a monthly, peer–reviewed journal primarily for urologists, residents, interns, nephrologists, and other specialists interested in urology The mission of Urology®, the "Gold Journal," is to provide practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers practicing the art of urology worldwide. Urology® publishes original articles relating to adult and pediatric clinical urology as well as to clinical and basic science research. Topics in Urology® include pediatrics, surgical oncology, radiology, pathology, erectile dysfunction, infertility, incontinence, transplantation, endourology, andrology, female urology, reconstructive surgery, and medical oncology, as well as relevant basic science issues. Special features include rapid communication of important timely issues, surgeon''s workshops, interesting case reports, surgical techniques, clinical and basic science review articles, guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, and historical articles in urology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信